Cargando…

What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?

During binocular rivalry, perception alternates between dissimilar images presented dichoptically. Although perception during rivalry is believed to originate from competition at a local level, different rivalry zones are not independent: rival targets that are spaced apart but have similar features...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuit, Sjoerd M., Paffen, Chris L. E., van der Smagt, Maarten J., Verstraten, Frans A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00117
_version_ 1782214201722273792
author Stuit, Sjoerd M.
Paffen, Chris L. E.
van der Smagt, Maarten J.
Verstraten, Frans A. J.
author_facet Stuit, Sjoerd M.
Paffen, Chris L. E.
van der Smagt, Maarten J.
Verstraten, Frans A. J.
author_sort Stuit, Sjoerd M.
collection PubMed
description During binocular rivalry, perception alternates between dissimilar images presented dichoptically. Although perception during rivalry is believed to originate from competition at a local level, different rivalry zones are not independent: rival targets that are spaced apart but have similar features tend to be dominant at the same time. We investigated grouping of spatially separated rival targets presented to the same or to different eyes and presented in the same or in different hemifields. We found eye-of-origin to be the strongest cue for grouping during binocular rivalry. Grouping was additionally affected by orientation: identical orientations were grouped longer than dissimilar orientations, even when presented to different eyes. Our results suggest that eye-based and orientation-based grouping is independent and additive in nature. Grouping effects were further modulated by the distribution of the targets across the visual field. That is, grouping within the same hemifield can be stronger or weaker than between hemifields, depending on the eye-of-origin of the grouped targets. We also quantified the contribution of the previous cues to grouping of two images during binocular rivalry. These quantifications can be successfully used to predict the dominance durations of different studies. Incorporating the relative contribution of different cues to grouping, and the dependency on hemifield, into future models of binocular rivalry will prove useful in our understanding of the functional and anatomical basis of the phenomenon of binocular rivalry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3196312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31963122011-10-21 What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry? Stuit, Sjoerd M. Paffen, Chris L. E. van der Smagt, Maarten J. Verstraten, Frans A. J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience During binocular rivalry, perception alternates between dissimilar images presented dichoptically. Although perception during rivalry is believed to originate from competition at a local level, different rivalry zones are not independent: rival targets that are spaced apart but have similar features tend to be dominant at the same time. We investigated grouping of spatially separated rival targets presented to the same or to different eyes and presented in the same or in different hemifields. We found eye-of-origin to be the strongest cue for grouping during binocular rivalry. Grouping was additionally affected by orientation: identical orientations were grouped longer than dissimilar orientations, even when presented to different eyes. Our results suggest that eye-based and orientation-based grouping is independent and additive in nature. Grouping effects were further modulated by the distribution of the targets across the visual field. That is, grouping within the same hemifield can be stronger or weaker than between hemifields, depending on the eye-of-origin of the grouped targets. We also quantified the contribution of the previous cues to grouping of two images during binocular rivalry. These quantifications can be successfully used to predict the dominance durations of different studies. Incorporating the relative contribution of different cues to grouping, and the dependency on hemifield, into future models of binocular rivalry will prove useful in our understanding of the functional and anatomical basis of the phenomenon of binocular rivalry. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3196312/ /pubmed/22022312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00117 Text en Copyright © 2011 Stuit, Paffen, van der Smagt and Verstraten. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Stuit, Sjoerd M.
Paffen, Chris L. E.
van der Smagt, Maarten J.
Verstraten, Frans A. J.
What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title_full What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title_fullStr What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title_full_unstemmed What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title_short What is Grouping during Binocular Rivalry?
title_sort what is grouping during binocular rivalry?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22022312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00117
work_keys_str_mv AT stuitsjoerdm whatisgroupingduringbinocularrivalry
AT paffenchrisle whatisgroupingduringbinocularrivalry
AT vandersmagtmaartenj whatisgroupingduringbinocularrivalry
AT verstratenfransaj whatisgroupingduringbinocularrivalry