Cargando…
Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality
Understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental changes is essential to provide the evidence-base that underpins conservation initiatives. The present study provides a standardized comparison between unbaited flight intercept traps (FIT) and baited pitfall traps (BPT) for sampling dung beet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026208 |
_version_ | 1782214214623952896 |
---|---|
author | de Andrade, Rafael Barreto Barlow, Jos Louzada, Julio Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Zagury Souza, Mateus Silveira, Juliana M. Cochrane, Mark A. |
author_facet | de Andrade, Rafael Barreto Barlow, Jos Louzada, Julio Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Zagury Souza, Mateus Silveira, Juliana M. Cochrane, Mark A. |
author_sort | de Andrade, Rafael Barreto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental changes is essential to provide the evidence-base that underpins conservation initiatives. The present study provides a standardized comparison between unbaited flight intercept traps (FIT) and baited pitfall traps (BPT) for sampling dung beetles. We examine the effectiveness of the two to assess fire disturbance effects and how trap performance is affected by seasonality. The study was carried out in a transitional forest between Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna) and Amazon Forest. Dung beetles were collected during one wet and one dry sampling season. The two methods sampled different portions of the local beetle assemblage. Both FIT and BPT were sensitive to fire disturbance during the wet season, but only BPT detected community differences during the dry season. Both traps showed similar correlation with environmental factors. Our results indicate that seasonality had a stronger effect than trap type, with BPT more effective and robust under low population numbers, and FIT more sensitive to fine scale heterogeneity patterns. This study shows the strengths and weaknesses of two commonly used methodologies for sampling dung beetles in tropical forests, as well as highlighting the importance of seasonality in shaping the results obtained by both sampling strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3196506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31965062011-10-25 Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality de Andrade, Rafael Barreto Barlow, Jos Louzada, Julio Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Zagury Souza, Mateus Silveira, Juliana M. Cochrane, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article Understanding how biodiversity responds to environmental changes is essential to provide the evidence-base that underpins conservation initiatives. The present study provides a standardized comparison between unbaited flight intercept traps (FIT) and baited pitfall traps (BPT) for sampling dung beetles. We examine the effectiveness of the two to assess fire disturbance effects and how trap performance is affected by seasonality. The study was carried out in a transitional forest between Cerrado (Brazilian Savanna) and Amazon Forest. Dung beetles were collected during one wet and one dry sampling season. The two methods sampled different portions of the local beetle assemblage. Both FIT and BPT were sensitive to fire disturbance during the wet season, but only BPT detected community differences during the dry season. Both traps showed similar correlation with environmental factors. Our results indicate that seasonality had a stronger effect than trap type, with BPT more effective and robust under low population numbers, and FIT more sensitive to fine scale heterogeneity patterns. This study shows the strengths and weaknesses of two commonly used methodologies for sampling dung beetles in tropical forests, as well as highlighting the importance of seasonality in shaping the results obtained by both sampling strategies. Public Library of Science 2011-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3196506/ /pubmed/22028831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026208 Text en Andrade et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Andrade, Rafael Barreto Barlow, Jos Louzada, Julio Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Zagury Souza, Mateus Silveira, Juliana M. Cochrane, Mark A. Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title | Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title_full | Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title_fullStr | Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title_short | Quantifying Responses of Dung Beetles to Fire Disturbance in Tropical Forests: The Importance of Trapping Method and Seasonality |
title_sort | quantifying responses of dung beetles to fire disturbance in tropical forests: the importance of trapping method and seasonality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deandraderafaelbarreto quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT barlowjos quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT louzadajulio quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT vazdemellofernandozagury quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT souzamateus quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT silveirajulianam quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality AT cochranemarka quantifyingresponsesofdungbeetlestofiredisturbanceintropicalforeststheimportanceoftrappingmethodandseasonality |