Cargando…
Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh sampl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284 |
_version_ | 1782214254756102144 |
---|---|
author | Houzé, Sandrine Hubert, Véronique Cohen, Dorit Pessler Rivetz, Baruch Le Bras, Jacques |
author_facet | Houzé, Sandrine Hubert, Véronique Cohen, Dorit Pessler Rivetz, Baruch Le Bras, Jacques |
author_sort | Houzé, Sandrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh samples obtained in returned international travellers using microscopy corrected by PCR as the reference method. Included samples were Plasmodium falciparum (139), Plasmodium vivax (22), Plasmodium ovale (20), Plasmodium malariae (7), and 102 negative. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for the detection of Plasmodium spp was 93.2%. For P. falciparum, the sensitivity was 98.6%; for P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae, overall sensitivities were 90.9%, 60.0% and 85.7% respectively. For P. falciparum and for P. vivax, the sensitivities increased to 100% at parasite densities above 100/μl. The specificity was 100%. The test was easily to perform and the result was stable for at least 1 hour. CONCLUSION: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH was efficient for the diagnosis of malaria. The test was very sensitive for P. falciparum and P. vivax detection. The sensitivities for P. ovale and P. malariae were better than other RDTs |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3196929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31969292011-10-20 Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting Houzé, Sandrine Hubert, Véronique Cohen, Dorit Pessler Rivetz, Baruch Le Bras, Jacques Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh samples obtained in returned international travellers using microscopy corrected by PCR as the reference method. Included samples were Plasmodium falciparum (139), Plasmodium vivax (22), Plasmodium ovale (20), Plasmodium malariae (7), and 102 negative. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for the detection of Plasmodium spp was 93.2%. For P. falciparum, the sensitivity was 98.6%; for P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae, overall sensitivities were 90.9%, 60.0% and 85.7% respectively. For P. falciparum and for P. vivax, the sensitivities increased to 100% at parasite densities above 100/μl. The specificity was 100%. The test was easily to perform and the result was stable for at least 1 hour. CONCLUSION: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH was efficient for the diagnosis of malaria. The test was very sensitive for P. falciparum and P. vivax detection. The sensitivities for P. ovale and P. malariae were better than other RDTs BioMed Central 2011-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3196929/ /pubmed/21951996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284 Text en Copyright ©2011 Houzé et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Houzé, Sandrine Hubert, Véronique Cohen, Dorit Pessler Rivetz, Baruch Le Bras, Jacques Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title | Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title_full | Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title_short | Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
title_sort | evaluation of the clearview(® )malaria pldh malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houzesandrine evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting AT hubertveronique evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting AT cohendoritpessler evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting AT rivetzbaruch evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting AT lebrasjacques evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting |