Cargando…

Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting

BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houzé, Sandrine, Hubert, Véronique, Cohen, Dorit Pessler, Rivetz, Baruch, Le Bras, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284
_version_ 1782214254756102144
author Houzé, Sandrine
Hubert, Véronique
Cohen, Dorit Pessler
Rivetz, Baruch
Le Bras, Jacques
author_facet Houzé, Sandrine
Hubert, Véronique
Cohen, Dorit Pessler
Rivetz, Baruch
Le Bras, Jacques
author_sort Houzé, Sandrine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh samples obtained in returned international travellers using microscopy corrected by PCR as the reference method. Included samples were Plasmodium falciparum (139), Plasmodium vivax (22), Plasmodium ovale (20), Plasmodium malariae (7), and 102 negative. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for the detection of Plasmodium spp was 93.2%. For P. falciparum, the sensitivity was 98.6%; for P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae, overall sensitivities were 90.9%, 60.0% and 85.7% respectively. For P. falciparum and for P. vivax, the sensitivities increased to 100% at parasite densities above 100/μl. The specificity was 100%. The test was easily to perform and the result was stable for at least 1 hour. CONCLUSION: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH was efficient for the diagnosis of malaria. The test was very sensitive for P. falciparum and P. vivax detection. The sensitivities for P. ovale and P. malariae were better than other RDTs
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3196929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31969292011-10-20 Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting Houzé, Sandrine Hubert, Véronique Cohen, Dorit Pessler Rivetz, Baruch Le Bras, Jacques Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) are widely used to diagnose malaria. The present study evaluated a new RDT, the Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test targeting the pan-Plasmodium antigen lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH). METHODS: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH test was evaluated on fresh samples obtained in returned international travellers using microscopy corrected by PCR as the reference method. Included samples were Plasmodium falciparum (139), Plasmodium vivax (22), Plasmodium ovale (20), Plasmodium malariae (7), and 102 negative. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity for the detection of Plasmodium spp was 93.2%. For P. falciparum, the sensitivity was 98.6%; for P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae, overall sensitivities were 90.9%, 60.0% and 85.7% respectively. For P. falciparum and for P. vivax, the sensitivities increased to 100% at parasite densities above 100/μl. The specificity was 100%. The test was easily to perform and the result was stable for at least 1 hour. CONCLUSION: The Clearview(® )Malaria pLDH was efficient for the diagnosis of malaria. The test was very sensitive for P. falciparum and P. vivax detection. The sensitivities for P. ovale and P. malariae were better than other RDTs BioMed Central 2011-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3196929/ /pubmed/21951996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284 Text en Copyright ©2011 Houzé et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Houzé, Sandrine
Hubert, Véronique
Cohen, Dorit Pessler
Rivetz, Baruch
Le Bras, Jacques
Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title_full Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title_short Evaluation of the Clearview(® )malaria pLDH malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
title_sort evaluation of the clearview(® )malaria pldh malaria rapid diagnostic test in a non-endemic setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21951996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-284
work_keys_str_mv AT houzesandrine evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting
AT hubertveronique evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting
AT cohendoritpessler evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting
AT rivetzbaruch evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting
AT lebrasjacques evaluationoftheclearviewmalariapldhmalariarapiddiagnostictestinanonendemicsetting