Cargando…

Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa

BACKGROUND: The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Juan, Wu, Yuxia, Ren, Guangpeng, Guo, Qiuhong, Liu, Jianquan, Lascoux, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026530
_version_ 1782214318662615040
author Wang, Juan
Wu, Yuxia
Ren, Guangpeng
Guo, Qiuhong
Liu, Jianquan
Lascoux, Martin
author_facet Wang, Juan
Wu, Yuxia
Ren, Guangpeng
Guo, Qiuhong
Liu, Jianquan
Lascoux, Martin
author_sort Wang, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations. CONCLUSIONS: The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3197521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31975212011-10-25 Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa Wang, Juan Wu, Yuxia Ren, Guangpeng Guo, Qiuhong Liu, Jianquan Lascoux, Martin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations. CONCLUSIONS: The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species. Public Library of Science 2011-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3197521/ /pubmed/22028897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026530 Text en Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Juan
Wu, Yuxia
Ren, Guangpeng
Guo, Qiuhong
Liu, Jianquan
Lascoux, Martin
Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title_full Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title_fullStr Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title_short Genetic Differentiation and Delimitation between Ecologically Diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa
title_sort genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged populus euphratica and p. pruinosa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026530
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjuan geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa
AT wuyuxia geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa
AT renguangpeng geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa
AT guoqiuhong geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa
AT liujianquan geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa
AT lascouxmartin geneticdifferentiationanddelimitationbetweenecologicallydivergedpopuluseuphraticaandppruinosa