Cargando…

DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation

BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence suggests that DNA secondary structures impact DNA replication, transcription and genomic rearrangements. One of the best studied examples is the recurrent constitutional t(11;22) in humans that is mediated by potentially cruciform-forming sequences at the breakpoints,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Takema, Inagaki, Hidehito, Tong, Maoqing, Kogo, Hiroshi, Ohye, Tamae, Yamada, Kouji, Tsutsumi, Makiko, Emanuel, Beverly S, Kurahashi, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21899780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-4-18
_version_ 1782214326100164608
author Kato, Takema
Inagaki, Hidehito
Tong, Maoqing
Kogo, Hiroshi
Ohye, Tamae
Yamada, Kouji
Tsutsumi, Makiko
Emanuel, Beverly S
Kurahashi, Hiroki
author_facet Kato, Takema
Inagaki, Hidehito
Tong, Maoqing
Kogo, Hiroshi
Ohye, Tamae
Yamada, Kouji
Tsutsumi, Makiko
Emanuel, Beverly S
Kurahashi, Hiroki
author_sort Kato, Takema
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence suggests that DNA secondary structures impact DNA replication, transcription and genomic rearrangements. One of the best studied examples is the recurrent constitutional t(11;22) in humans that is mediated by potentially cruciform-forming sequences at the breakpoints, palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRRs). We previously demonstrated that polymorphisms of PATRR sequences affect the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s in sperm samples from normal healthy males. These studies were designed to determine whether PATRR polymorphisms affect DNA secondary structure, thus leading to variation in translocation frequency. METHODS: We studied the potential for DNA cruciform formation for several PATRR11 polymorphic alleles using mobility shift analysis in gel electrophoresis as well as by direct visualization of the DNA by atomic force microscopy. The structural data for various alleles were compared with the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s the allele produced. RESULTS: The data indicate that the propensity for DNA cruciform structure of each polymorphic allele correlates with the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s produced (r = 0.77, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although indirect, our results strongly suggest that the PATRR adopts unstable cruciform structures during spermatogenesis that act as translocation hotspots in humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3197554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31975542011-10-21 DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation Kato, Takema Inagaki, Hidehito Tong, Maoqing Kogo, Hiroshi Ohye, Tamae Yamada, Kouji Tsutsumi, Makiko Emanuel, Beverly S Kurahashi, Hiroki Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence suggests that DNA secondary structures impact DNA replication, transcription and genomic rearrangements. One of the best studied examples is the recurrent constitutional t(11;22) in humans that is mediated by potentially cruciform-forming sequences at the breakpoints, palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRRs). We previously demonstrated that polymorphisms of PATRR sequences affect the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s in sperm samples from normal healthy males. These studies were designed to determine whether PATRR polymorphisms affect DNA secondary structure, thus leading to variation in translocation frequency. METHODS: We studied the potential for DNA cruciform formation for several PATRR11 polymorphic alleles using mobility shift analysis in gel electrophoresis as well as by direct visualization of the DNA by atomic force microscopy. The structural data for various alleles were compared with the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s the allele produced. RESULTS: The data indicate that the propensity for DNA cruciform structure of each polymorphic allele correlates with the frequency of de novo t(11;22)s produced (r = 0.77, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although indirect, our results strongly suggest that the PATRR adopts unstable cruciform structures during spermatogenesis that act as translocation hotspots in humans. BioMed Central 2011-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3197554/ /pubmed/21899780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-4-18 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kato et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kato, Takema
Inagaki, Hidehito
Tong, Maoqing
Kogo, Hiroshi
Ohye, Tamae
Yamada, Kouji
Tsutsumi, Makiko
Emanuel, Beverly S
Kurahashi, Hiroki
DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title_full DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title_fullStr DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title_full_unstemmed DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title_short DNA secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
title_sort dna secondary structure is influenced by genetic variation and alters susceptibility to de novo translocation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21899780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8166-4-18
work_keys_str_mv AT katotakema dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT inagakihidehito dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT tongmaoqing dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT kogohiroshi dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT ohyetamae dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT yamadakouji dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT tsutsumimakiko dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT emanuelbeverlys dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation
AT kurahashihiroki dnasecondarystructureisinfluencedbygeneticvariationandalterssusceptibilitytodenovotranslocation