Cargando…

Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study

BACKGROUND: Distribution of body fat is more important than the amount of fat as a prognostic factor for life expectancy. Despite that, body mass index (BMI) still holds its status as the most used indicator of obesity in clinical work. METHODS: We assessed the association of five different anthropo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petursson, Halfdan, Sigurdsson, Johann A., Bengtsson, Calle, Nilsen, Tom I. L., Getz, Linn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026621
_version_ 1782214356406108160
author Petursson, Halfdan
Sigurdsson, Johann A.
Bengtsson, Calle
Nilsen, Tom I. L.
Getz, Linn
author_facet Petursson, Halfdan
Sigurdsson, Johann A.
Bengtsson, Calle
Nilsen, Tom I. L.
Getz, Linn
author_sort Petursson, Halfdan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distribution of body fat is more important than the amount of fat as a prognostic factor for life expectancy. Despite that, body mass index (BMI) still holds its status as the most used indicator of obesity in clinical work. METHODS: We assessed the association of five different anthropometric measures with mortality in general and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in particular using Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive properties were compared by computing integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement for two different prediction models. The measures studied were BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). The study population was a prospective cohort of 62,223 Norwegians, age 20–79, followed up for mortality from 1995–1997 to the end of 2008 (mean follow-up 12.0 years) in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2). RESULTS: After adjusting for age, smoking and physical activity WHR and WHtR were found to be the strongest predictors of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD mortality per increase in WHR of one standard deviation were 1.23 for men and 1.27 for women. For WHtR, these HRs were 1.24 for men and 1.23 for women. WHR offered the greatest integrated discrimination improvement to the prediction models studied, followed by WHtR and waist circumference. Hip circumference was in strong inverse association with mortality when adjusting for waist circumference. In all analyses, BMI had weaker association with mortality than three of the other four measures studied. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds further knowledge to the evidence that BMI is not the most appropriate measure of obesity in everyday clinical practice. WHR can reliably be measured and is as easy to calculate as BMI and is currently better documented than WHtR. It appears reasonable to recommend WHR as the primary measure of body composition and obesity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3197688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31976882011-10-25 Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study Petursson, Halfdan Sigurdsson, Johann A. Bengtsson, Calle Nilsen, Tom I. L. Getz, Linn PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Distribution of body fat is more important than the amount of fat as a prognostic factor for life expectancy. Despite that, body mass index (BMI) still holds its status as the most used indicator of obesity in clinical work. METHODS: We assessed the association of five different anthropometric measures with mortality in general and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in particular using Cox proportional hazards models. Predictive properties were compared by computing integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement for two different prediction models. The measures studied were BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). The study population was a prospective cohort of 62,223 Norwegians, age 20–79, followed up for mortality from 1995–1997 to the end of 2008 (mean follow-up 12.0 years) in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT 2). RESULTS: After adjusting for age, smoking and physical activity WHR and WHtR were found to be the strongest predictors of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD mortality per increase in WHR of one standard deviation were 1.23 for men and 1.27 for women. For WHtR, these HRs were 1.24 for men and 1.23 for women. WHR offered the greatest integrated discrimination improvement to the prediction models studied, followed by WHtR and waist circumference. Hip circumference was in strong inverse association with mortality when adjusting for waist circumference. In all analyses, BMI had weaker association with mortality than three of the other four measures studied. CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds further knowledge to the evidence that BMI is not the most appropriate measure of obesity in everyday clinical practice. WHR can reliably be measured and is as easy to calculate as BMI and is currently better documented than WHtR. It appears reasonable to recommend WHR as the primary measure of body composition and obesity. Public Library of Science 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3197688/ /pubmed/22028926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026621 Text en Petursson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petursson, Halfdan
Sigurdsson, Johann A.
Bengtsson, Calle
Nilsen, Tom I. L.
Getz, Linn
Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title_full Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title_fullStr Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title_full_unstemmed Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title_short Body Configuration as a Predictor of Mortality: Comparison of Five Anthropometric Measures in a 12 Year Follow-Up of the Norwegian HUNT 2 Study
title_sort body configuration as a predictor of mortality: comparison of five anthropometric measures in a 12 year follow-up of the norwegian hunt 2 study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3197688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026621
work_keys_str_mv AT peturssonhalfdan bodyconfigurationasapredictorofmortalitycomparisonoffiveanthropometricmeasuresina12yearfollowupofthenorwegianhunt2study
AT sigurdssonjohanna bodyconfigurationasapredictorofmortalitycomparisonoffiveanthropometricmeasuresina12yearfollowupofthenorwegianhunt2study
AT bengtssoncalle bodyconfigurationasapredictorofmortalitycomparisonoffiveanthropometricmeasuresina12yearfollowupofthenorwegianhunt2study
AT nilsentomil bodyconfigurationasapredictorofmortalitycomparisonoffiveanthropometricmeasuresina12yearfollowupofthenorwegianhunt2study
AT getzlinn bodyconfigurationasapredictorofmortalitycomparisonoffiveanthropometricmeasuresina12yearfollowupofthenorwegianhunt2study