Cargando…

Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging

Bladder artifact during bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a common source of error. The extent and severity of bladder artifacts have been described for filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) may help to address this pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katua, A. M., Ankrah, A. O., Vorster, M., van Gelder, A., Sathekge, M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034576
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.82108
_version_ 1782214369924349952
author Katua, A. M.
Ankrah, A. O.
Vorster, M.
van Gelder, A.
Sathekge, M. M.
author_facet Katua, A. M.
Ankrah, A. O.
Vorster, M.
van Gelder, A.
Sathekge, M. M.
author_sort Katua, A. M.
collection PubMed
description Bladder artifact during bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a common source of error. The extent and severity of bladder artifacts have been described for filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) may help to address this problem of bladder artifacts, which render up to 20% of the SPECT images unreadable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship of the bladder to acetabulum ratio in guiding the choice of the number of iterations and subsets used for OSEM reconstruction, for reducing bladder artifacts found on FBP reconstruction. One hundred five patients with various indications for bone scans were selected and planar and SPECT images were acquired. The SPECT images were reconstructed with both FBP and OSEM using four different combinations of iterations and subsets. The images were given to three experienced nuclear physicians who were blinded to the diagnosis and type of reconstruction used. They then labeled images from the best to the worst after which the data were analyzed. The bladder to acetabulum ratio for each image was determined which was then correlated with the different iterations and subsets used. The study demonstrated that reconstruction using OSEM led to better lesion detectability compared to FBP in 87.62% of cases. It further demonstrated that the iterations and subsets used for reconstruction of an image correlate with the bladder to acetabulum ratio. Four iterations and 8 subsets yielded the best results in 48.5% of the images, whilst 2 iterations and 8 subsets yielded the best results in 33.8%. The number of reconstructed images which yielded the best results with 2 iterations and 8 subsets was the same as or more than those with 4 iterations and 8 subsets when the bladder/acetabulum ratio (A/B) was between 0.2 and 0.39. A ratio below 0.2 or above 0.39 supports the usage of 4 iterations and 8 subsets over 2 iterations and 8 subsets. We conclude that bladder to acetabulum ratio can be used to select the optimum number of iterations and subsets for reconstruction of bone SPECT for accurate characterization of lesions. This study also confirms that reconstruction with OSEM (vs. FBP) leads to better lesion detectability and characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31980402011-10-27 Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging Katua, A. M. Ankrah, A. O. Vorster, M. van Gelder, A. Sathekge, M. M. World J Nucl Med Original Article Bladder artifact during bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a common source of error. The extent and severity of bladder artifacts have been described for filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) may help to address this problem of bladder artifacts, which render up to 20% of the SPECT images unreadable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship of the bladder to acetabulum ratio in guiding the choice of the number of iterations and subsets used for OSEM reconstruction, for reducing bladder artifacts found on FBP reconstruction. One hundred five patients with various indications for bone scans were selected and planar and SPECT images were acquired. The SPECT images were reconstructed with both FBP and OSEM using four different combinations of iterations and subsets. The images were given to three experienced nuclear physicians who were blinded to the diagnosis and type of reconstruction used. They then labeled images from the best to the worst after which the data were analyzed. The bladder to acetabulum ratio for each image was determined which was then correlated with the different iterations and subsets used. The study demonstrated that reconstruction using OSEM led to better lesion detectability compared to FBP in 87.62% of cases. It further demonstrated that the iterations and subsets used for reconstruction of an image correlate with the bladder to acetabulum ratio. Four iterations and 8 subsets yielded the best results in 48.5% of the images, whilst 2 iterations and 8 subsets yielded the best results in 33.8%. The number of reconstructed images which yielded the best results with 2 iterations and 8 subsets was the same as or more than those with 4 iterations and 8 subsets when the bladder/acetabulum ratio (A/B) was between 0.2 and 0.39. A ratio below 0.2 or above 0.39 supports the usage of 4 iterations and 8 subsets over 2 iterations and 8 subsets. We conclude that bladder to acetabulum ratio can be used to select the optimum number of iterations and subsets for reconstruction of bone SPECT for accurate characterization of lesions. This study also confirms that reconstruction with OSEM (vs. FBP) leads to better lesion detectability and characterization. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3198040/ /pubmed/22034576 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.82108 Text en Copyright: © World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Katua, A. M.
Ankrah, A. O.
Vorster, M.
van Gelder, A.
Sathekge, M. M.
Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title_full Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title_fullStr Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title_short Optimization of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction for Reducing Urinary Bladder Artifacts in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging
title_sort optimization of ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction for reducing urinary bladder artifacts in single-photon emission computed tomography imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034576
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.82108
work_keys_str_mv AT katuaam optimizationoforderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructionforreducingurinarybladderartifactsinsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyimaging
AT ankrahao optimizationoforderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructionforreducingurinarybladderartifactsinsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyimaging
AT vorsterm optimizationoforderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructionforreducingurinarybladderartifactsinsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyimaging
AT vangeldera optimizationoforderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructionforreducingurinarybladderartifactsinsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyimaging
AT sathekgemm optimizationoforderedsubsetexpectationmaximizationreconstructionforreducingurinarybladderartifactsinsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyimaging