Cargando…

Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma

AIM: To evaluate the influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and conventional peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) analyses provided by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma. METHODS: Eighty-two glaucoma pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cordeiro, Daniela Valença, Lima, Verônica Castro, Castro, Dinorah P, Castro, Leonardo C, Pacheco, Maria Angélica, Lee, Jae Min, Dimantas, Marcelo I, Prata, Tiago Santos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034552
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20893
_version_ 1782214417588420608
author Cordeiro, Daniela Valença
Lima, Verônica Castro
Castro, Dinorah P
Castro, Leonardo C
Pacheco, Maria Angélica
Lee, Jae Min
Dimantas, Marcelo I
Prata, Tiago Santos
author_facet Cordeiro, Daniela Valença
Lima, Verônica Castro
Castro, Dinorah P
Castro, Leonardo C
Pacheco, Maria Angélica
Lee, Jae Min
Dimantas, Marcelo I
Prata, Tiago Santos
author_sort Cordeiro, Daniela Valença
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and conventional peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) analyses provided by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma. METHODS: Eighty-two glaucoma patients and 30 healthy subjects were included. All patients underwent GCC (7 × 7 mm macular grid, consisting of RNFL, ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers) and pRNFL thickness measurement (3.45 mm circular scan) by SD-OCT. One eye was randomly selected for analysis. Initially, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for different GCC and pRNFL parameters. The effect of disc area on the diagnostic accuracy of these parameters was evaluated using a logistic ROC regression model. Subsequently, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm(2) disc sizes were arbitrarily chosen (based on data distribution) and the predicted areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) and sensitivities were compared at fixed specificities for each. RESULTS: Average mean deviation index for glaucomatous eyes was −5.3 ± 5.2 dB. Similar AUCs were found for the best pRNFL (average thickness = 0.872) and GCC parameters (average thickness = 0.824; P = 0.19). The coefficient representing disc area in the ROC regression model was not statistically significant for average pRNFL thickness (−0.176) or average GCC thickness (0.088; P ≥ 0.56). AUCs for fixed disc areas (1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm(2)) were 0.904, 0.891, and 0.875 for average pRNFL thickness and 0.834, 0.842, and 0.851 for average GCC thickness, respectively. The highest sensitivities – at 80% specificity for average pRNFL (84.5%) and GCC thicknesses (74.5%) – were found with disc sizes fixed at 1.5 mm(2) and 2.5 mm(2). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy was similar between pRNFL and GCC thickness parameters. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for a better diagnostic accuracy of pRNFL thickness measurement in cases of smaller discs. For GCC analysis, an inverse effect was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31984062011-10-27 Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma Cordeiro, Daniela Valença Lima, Verônica Castro Castro, Dinorah P Castro, Leonardo C Pacheco, Maria Angélica Lee, Jae Min Dimantas, Marcelo I Prata, Tiago Santos Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: To evaluate the influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic accuracy of macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and conventional peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) analyses provided by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in glaucoma. METHODS: Eighty-two glaucoma patients and 30 healthy subjects were included. All patients underwent GCC (7 × 7 mm macular grid, consisting of RNFL, ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers) and pRNFL thickness measurement (3.45 mm circular scan) by SD-OCT. One eye was randomly selected for analysis. Initially, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for different GCC and pRNFL parameters. The effect of disc area on the diagnostic accuracy of these parameters was evaluated using a logistic ROC regression model. Subsequently, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm(2) disc sizes were arbitrarily chosen (based on data distribution) and the predicted areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) and sensitivities were compared at fixed specificities for each. RESULTS: Average mean deviation index for glaucomatous eyes was −5.3 ± 5.2 dB. Similar AUCs were found for the best pRNFL (average thickness = 0.872) and GCC parameters (average thickness = 0.824; P = 0.19). The coefficient representing disc area in the ROC regression model was not statistically significant for average pRNFL thickness (−0.176) or average GCC thickness (0.088; P ≥ 0.56). AUCs for fixed disc areas (1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm(2)) were 0.904, 0.891, and 0.875 for average pRNFL thickness and 0.834, 0.842, and 0.851 for average GCC thickness, respectively. The highest sensitivities – at 80% specificity for average pRNFL (84.5%) and GCC thicknesses (74.5%) – were found with disc sizes fixed at 1.5 mm(2) and 2.5 mm(2). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy was similar between pRNFL and GCC thickness parameters. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for a better diagnostic accuracy of pRNFL thickness measurement in cases of smaller discs. For GCC analysis, an inverse effect was observed. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3198406/ /pubmed/22034552 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20893 Text en © 2011 Cordeiro et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cordeiro, Daniela Valença
Lima, Verônica Castro
Castro, Dinorah P
Castro, Leonardo C
Pacheco, Maria Angélica
Lee, Jae Min
Dimantas, Marcelo I
Prata, Tiago Santos
Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title_full Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title_fullStr Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title_short Influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
title_sort influence of optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of macular ganglion cell complex and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analyses in glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034552
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20893
work_keys_str_mv AT cordeirodanielavalenca influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT limaveronicacastro influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT castrodinorahp influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT castroleonardoc influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT pachecomariaangelica influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT leejaemin influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT dimantasmarceloi influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma
AT pratatiagosantos influenceofopticdiscsizeonthediagnosticperformanceofmacularganglioncellcomplexandperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayeranalysesinglaucoma