Cargando…

A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms. METHODS: In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar, Majid, Betts, Brent S, Churgin, Daniel S, Hsu, Maylon, Neuffer, Marcus, Sikder, Shameema, Church, Dane, Mifflin, Mark D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24316
_version_ 1782214417814913024
author Moshirfar, Majid
Betts, Brent S
Churgin, Daniel S
Hsu, Maylon
Neuffer, Marcus
Sikder, Shameema
Church, Dane
Mifflin, Mark D
author_facet Moshirfar, Majid
Betts, Brent S
Churgin, Daniel S
Hsu, Maylon
Neuffer, Marcus
Sikder, Shameema
Church, Dane
Mifflin, Mark D
author_sort Moshirfar, Majid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing. RESULTS: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were −0.067 ± 0.087 and −0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism. CONCLUSION: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31984072011-10-27 A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations Moshirfar, Majid Betts, Brent S Churgin, Daniel S Hsu, Maylon Neuffer, Marcus Sikder, Shameema Church, Dane Mifflin, Mark D Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing. RESULTS: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were −0.067 ± 0.087 and −0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism. CONCLUSION: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3198407/ /pubmed/22034553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24316 Text en © 2011 Moshirfar et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moshirfar, Majid
Betts, Brent S
Churgin, Daniel S
Hsu, Maylon
Neuffer, Marcus
Sikder, Shameema
Church, Dane
Mifflin, Mark D
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_full A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_short A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight(®) Allegretto Wave(®) Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_sort prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of wavelight(®) allegretto wave(®) eye-q versus visx customvue™ star s4 ir™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22034553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S24316
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarmajid aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT bettsbrents aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churgindaniels aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT hsumaylon aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT neuffermarcus aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT sikdershameema aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churchdane aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT mifflinmarkd aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT moshirfarmajid prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT bettsbrents prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churgindaniels prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT hsumaylon prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT neuffermarcus prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT sikdershameema prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churchdane prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT mifflinmarkd prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightallegrettowaveeyeqversusvisxcustomvuestars4irinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations