Cargando…

An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite to tooth using different adhesive techniques and rotary instruments under simulated pulpal pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human molars were randomly divided into two groups of 30 samples each (group I an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegde, Jayshree, Sravanthi, Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22025823
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.85794
_version_ 1782214448484712448
author Hegde, Jayshree
Sravanthi, Y
author_facet Hegde, Jayshree
Sravanthi, Y
author_sort Hegde, Jayshree
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite to tooth using different adhesive techniques and rotary instruments under simulated pulpal pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human molars were randomly divided into two groups of 30 samples each (group I and II), according to the adhesive technique followed (i.e. total etch and self etch groups). Each group was further divided into two sub-groups (Sub-groups A and B) of 15 samples each according to the cutting instrument (diamond abrasive or carbide burs) used. Class II cavities were made with diamond abrasive or carbide burs, and restored with nano-composite under positive intra-pulpal pressure. Shear bond strength of the specimens were recorded simultaneously. RESULTS: After statistical evaluation using two-way ANOVA and t-test, the mean shear bond strength values of the groups are as follows: Group IA- 4.69 MPa, Group IB-6.15 MPa, Group IIA-4.3 MPa, and Group IIB-6.24 MPa. It was seen that group IIB showed highest bond strength followed by group IB. Group II A showed the least bond strength. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, diamond abrasive gave better bond strength than carbide bur with both the adhesive techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31985492011-10-24 An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure Hegde, Jayshree Sravanthi, Y J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite to tooth using different adhesive techniques and rotary instruments under simulated pulpal pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted human molars were randomly divided into two groups of 30 samples each (group I and II), according to the adhesive technique followed (i.e. total etch and self etch groups). Each group was further divided into two sub-groups (Sub-groups A and B) of 15 samples each according to the cutting instrument (diamond abrasive or carbide burs) used. Class II cavities were made with diamond abrasive or carbide burs, and restored with nano-composite under positive intra-pulpal pressure. Shear bond strength of the specimens were recorded simultaneously. RESULTS: After statistical evaluation using two-way ANOVA and t-test, the mean shear bond strength values of the groups are as follows: Group IA- 4.69 MPa, Group IB-6.15 MPa, Group IIA-4.3 MPa, and Group IIB-6.24 MPa. It was seen that group IIB showed highest bond strength followed by group IB. Group II A showed the least bond strength. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study, diamond abrasive gave better bond strength than carbide bur with both the adhesive techniques. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3198549/ /pubmed/22025823 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.85794 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hegde, Jayshree
Sravanthi, Y
An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title_full An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title_fullStr An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title_short An in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
title_sort in vitro comparison of adhesive techniques and rotary instrumentation on shear bond strength of nanocomposite with simulated pulpal pressure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22025823
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.85794
work_keys_str_mv AT hegdejayshree aninvitrocomparisonofadhesivetechniquesandrotaryinstrumentationonshearbondstrengthofnanocompositewithsimulatedpulpalpressure
AT sravanthiy aninvitrocomparisonofadhesivetechniquesandrotaryinstrumentationonshearbondstrengthofnanocompositewithsimulatedpulpalpressure
AT hegdejayshree invitrocomparisonofadhesivetechniquesandrotaryinstrumentationonshearbondstrengthofnanocompositewithsimulatedpulpalpressure
AT sravanthiy invitrocomparisonofadhesivetechniquesandrotaryinstrumentationonshearbondstrengthofnanocompositewithsimulatedpulpalpressure