Cargando…

Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages

OBJECT: The aim is to evalute the outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous bone graft versus titanium Cages, BAK system (Bagby – Kuslich, Spine Tech, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) for low grade spondyloisthesis (Grade1,11). Interbody cages have been developed to replace tricortical Inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathy, Mostafa, Fahmy, Mohamed, Fakhri, Mazen, Aref, Khaled, Abdin, Khaled, Zidan, Ihab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028742
_version_ 1782214464753369088
author Fathy, Mostafa
Fahmy, Mohamed
Fakhri, Mazen
Aref, Khaled
Abdin, Khaled
Zidan, Ihab
author_facet Fathy, Mostafa
Fahmy, Mohamed
Fakhri, Mazen
Aref, Khaled
Abdin, Khaled
Zidan, Ihab
author_sort Fathy, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECT: The aim is to evalute the outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous bone graft versus titanium Cages, BAK system (Bagby – Kuslich, Spine Tech, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) for low grade spondyloisthesis (Grade1,11). Interbody cages have been developed to replace tricortical Interbody grafts in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedures. The cages provide immediate post operative stability and facilitate bony union with cancellous bone packed in the cage itself. METHOD: We Evaluated 50 consecutive patients in whom surgery was performed between June 2000 to June 2003 in the Main Alexandria University Hospital at EGYPT. Twenty five patients were operated using autologous bone graft and 25 patients using the BAK cages. The neuro–radiologic al work up consisted of; plain X – ray lumbosacral spine including dynamic films preoperative and postoperative follow up; C.T lumbosacral spine and MRI lumbosacral spine. The surgery was performed at L4-5 level in 34 cases and at L5-S1 level in 16 cases. The median follow up was 15 months. RESULTS: Satisfactory fusion was obtained at all levels at a minimum one year follow – up. The fusion rate was 96% (24 patients) for the cage group and 80% (20 patients) for bone graft group however clinical improvement was 64% (16 patients) for those with bone graft group. CONCLUSION: A higher fusion rates and a better clinical outcome have been obtained by Instrumented PLIF with titanium cages that with bone graft. Inderbody fusion cages help to stabilize spainal segment primarily by distracting them as well as by allowing bone ingrowth and fusion. The procedure is safe and effective with 96% fusion rate and 76% overall Satisfactory rate. The use of cages help to distract the space between the vertebral bodies making the correction of the degree of spondylolisthesis easier. Long term follow up revealed better fusion rate and better realignment and less resorption with cages than with bone grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31986572011-10-25 Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages Fathy, Mostafa Fahmy, Mohamed Fakhri, Mazen Aref, Khaled Abdin, Khaled Zidan, Ihab Asian J Neurosurg Original Article OBJECT: The aim is to evalute the outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous bone graft versus titanium Cages, BAK system (Bagby – Kuslich, Spine Tech, Inc. Minneapolis, MN) for low grade spondyloisthesis (Grade1,11). Interbody cages have been developed to replace tricortical Interbody grafts in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedures. The cages provide immediate post operative stability and facilitate bony union with cancellous bone packed in the cage itself. METHOD: We Evaluated 50 consecutive patients in whom surgery was performed between June 2000 to June 2003 in the Main Alexandria University Hospital at EGYPT. Twenty five patients were operated using autologous bone graft and 25 patients using the BAK cages. The neuro–radiologic al work up consisted of; plain X – ray lumbosacral spine including dynamic films preoperative and postoperative follow up; C.T lumbosacral spine and MRI lumbosacral spine. The surgery was performed at L4-5 level in 34 cases and at L5-S1 level in 16 cases. The median follow up was 15 months. RESULTS: Satisfactory fusion was obtained at all levels at a minimum one year follow – up. The fusion rate was 96% (24 patients) for the cage group and 80% (20 patients) for bone graft group however clinical improvement was 64% (16 patients) for those with bone graft group. CONCLUSION: A higher fusion rates and a better clinical outcome have been obtained by Instrumented PLIF with titanium cages that with bone graft. Inderbody fusion cages help to stabilize spainal segment primarily by distracting them as well as by allowing bone ingrowth and fusion. The procedure is safe and effective with 96% fusion rate and 76% overall Satisfactory rate. The use of cages help to distract the space between the vertebral bodies making the correction of the degree of spondylolisthesis easier. Long term follow up revealed better fusion rate and better realignment and less resorption with cages than with bone grafts. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3198657/ /pubmed/22028742 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fathy, Mostafa
Fahmy, Mohamed
Fakhri, Mazen
Aref, Khaled
Abdin, Khaled
Zidan, Ihab
Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title_full Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title_fullStr Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title_short Outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; Evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
title_sort outcome of instrumented lumbar fusion for low grade spondylolisthesis; evaluation of interbody fusion with & without cages
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028742
work_keys_str_mv AT fathymostafa outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages
AT fahmymohamed outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages
AT fakhrimazen outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages
AT arefkhaled outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages
AT abdinkhaled outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages
AT zidanihab outcomeofinstrumentedlumbarfusionforlowgradespondylolisthesisevaluationofinterbodyfusionwithwithoutcages