Cargando…

Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe aspects of case study herds investigated by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF) in which animal welfare incidents occurred and to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be monitored to enhance the Early Warning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Patricia C, More, Simon J, Blake, Martin, Hanlon, Alison J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-64-13
_version_ 1782214471259783168
author Kelly, Patricia C
More, Simon J
Blake, Martin
Hanlon, Alison J
author_facet Kelly, Patricia C
More, Simon J
Blake, Martin
Hanlon, Alison J
author_sort Kelly, Patricia C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe aspects of case study herds investigated by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF) in which animal welfare incidents occurred and to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be monitored to enhance the Early Warning System (EWS). Despite an EWS being in place for a number of years, animal welfare incidents continue to occur. Questionnaires regarding welfare incidents were sent to Superintending Veterinary Inspectors (SVIs), resulting in 18 herds being chosen as case study herds, 12 of which had a clearly defined welfare incident date. For each study herd, data on six potential KPIs were extracted from DAFF databases. The KPIs for those herds with a clearly defined welfare incident date were studied for a consecutive four year window, with the fourth year being the 'incident year', when the welfare incident was disclosed. For study herds without a clearly defined welfare incident date, the KPIs were determined on a yearly basis between 2001 and 2009. RESULTS: We found that the late registration of calves, the use of on-farm burial as a method of carcase disposal, an increasing number of moves to knackeries over time and records of animals moved to 'herd unknown' were notable on the case farms. CONCLUSION: Four KPIs were prominent on the case study farms and warrant further investigation in control herds to determine their potential to provide a framework for refining current systems of early warning and prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31986842011-10-23 Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention Kelly, Patricia C More, Simon J Blake, Martin Hanlon, Alison J Ir Vet J Case Study BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe aspects of case study herds investigated by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF) in which animal welfare incidents occurred and to identify key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be monitored to enhance the Early Warning System (EWS). Despite an EWS being in place for a number of years, animal welfare incidents continue to occur. Questionnaires regarding welfare incidents were sent to Superintending Veterinary Inspectors (SVIs), resulting in 18 herds being chosen as case study herds, 12 of which had a clearly defined welfare incident date. For each study herd, data on six potential KPIs were extracted from DAFF databases. The KPIs for those herds with a clearly defined welfare incident date were studied for a consecutive four year window, with the fourth year being the 'incident year', when the welfare incident was disclosed. For study herds without a clearly defined welfare incident date, the KPIs were determined on a yearly basis between 2001 and 2009. RESULTS: We found that the late registration of calves, the use of on-farm burial as a method of carcase disposal, an increasing number of moves to knackeries over time and records of animals moved to 'herd unknown' were notable on the case farms. CONCLUSION: Four KPIs were prominent on the case study farms and warrant further investigation in control herds to determine their potential to provide a framework for refining current systems of early warning and prevention. BioMed Central 2011-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3198684/ /pubmed/21982340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-64-13 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Kelly, Patricia C
More, Simon J
Blake, Martin
Hanlon, Alison J
Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title_full Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title_fullStr Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title_full_unstemmed Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title_short Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
title_sort identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-64-13
work_keys_str_mv AT kellypatriciac identificationofkeyperformanceindicatorsforonfarmanimalwelfareincidentspossibletoolsforearlywarningandprevention
AT moresimonj identificationofkeyperformanceindicatorsforonfarmanimalwelfareincidentspossibletoolsforearlywarningandprevention
AT blakemartin identificationofkeyperformanceindicatorsforonfarmanimalwelfareincidentspossibletoolsforearlywarningandprevention
AT hanlonalisonj identificationofkeyperformanceindicatorsforonfarmanimalwelfareincidentspossibletoolsforearlywarningandprevention