Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, causing pain and functional impairments. According to international guidelines, exercise therapy has a short-term effect in reducing pain/functional impairments in knee OA and is therefore also generally recommended for hip OA. Becaus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Es, Pauline P, Luijsterburg, Pim AJ, Dekker, Joost, Koopmanschap, Marc A, Bohnen, Arthur M, Verhaar, Jan AN, Koes, Bart W, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-232
_version_ 1782214488851742720
author van Es, Pauline P
Luijsterburg, Pim AJ
Dekker, Joost
Koopmanschap, Marc A
Bohnen, Arthur M
Verhaar, Jan AN
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
author_facet van Es, Pauline P
Luijsterburg, Pim AJ
Dekker, Joost
Koopmanschap, Marc A
Bohnen, Arthur M
Verhaar, Jan AN
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
author_sort van Es, Pauline P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, causing pain and functional impairments. According to international guidelines, exercise therapy has a short-term effect in reducing pain/functional impairments in knee OA and is therefore also generally recommended for hip OA. Because of its high prevalence and clinical implications, OA is associated with considerable (healthcare) costs. However, studies evaluating cost-effectiveness of common exercise therapy in hip OA are lacking. Therefore, this randomised controlled trial is designed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in conjunction with the general practitioner's (GP) care, compared to GP care alone, for patients with hip OA. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients aged ≥ 45 years with OA of the hip, who consulted the GP during the past year for hip complaints and who comply with the American College of Rheumatology criteria, are included. Patients are randomly assigned to either exercise therapy in addition to GP care, or to GP care alone. Exercise therapy consists of (maximally) 12 treatment sessions with a physiotherapist, and home exercises. These are followed by three additional treatment sessions in the 5th, 7th and 9th month after the first treatment session. GP care consists of usual care for hip OA, such as general advice or prescribing pain medication. Primary outcomes are hip pain and hip-related activity limitations (measured with the Hip disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS]), direct costs, and productivity costs (measured with the PROductivity and DISease Questionnaire). These parameters are measured at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up. To detect a 25% clinical difference in the HOOS pain score, with a power of 80% and an alpha 5%, 210 patients are required. Data are analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Effectiveness is evaluated using linear regression models with repeated measurements. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and an incremental cost-utility analysis will also be performed. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide insight into the cost-effectiveness of adding exercise therapy to GPs' care in the treatment of OA of the hip. This trial is registered in the Dutch trial registry http://www.trialregister.nl: trial number NTR1462.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31987642011-10-23 Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial van Es, Pauline P Luijsterburg, Pim AJ Dekker, Joost Koopmanschap, Marc A Bohnen, Arthur M Verhaar, Jan AN Koes, Bart W Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease, causing pain and functional impairments. According to international guidelines, exercise therapy has a short-term effect in reducing pain/functional impairments in knee OA and is therefore also generally recommended for hip OA. Because of its high prevalence and clinical implications, OA is associated with considerable (healthcare) costs. However, studies evaluating cost-effectiveness of common exercise therapy in hip OA are lacking. Therefore, this randomised controlled trial is designed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in conjunction with the general practitioner's (GP) care, compared to GP care alone, for patients with hip OA. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients aged ≥ 45 years with OA of the hip, who consulted the GP during the past year for hip complaints and who comply with the American College of Rheumatology criteria, are included. Patients are randomly assigned to either exercise therapy in addition to GP care, or to GP care alone. Exercise therapy consists of (maximally) 12 treatment sessions with a physiotherapist, and home exercises. These are followed by three additional treatment sessions in the 5th, 7th and 9th month after the first treatment session. GP care consists of usual care for hip OA, such as general advice or prescribing pain medication. Primary outcomes are hip pain and hip-related activity limitations (measured with the Hip disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS]), direct costs, and productivity costs (measured with the PROductivity and DISease Questionnaire). These parameters are measured at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up. To detect a 25% clinical difference in the HOOS pain score, with a power of 80% and an alpha 5%, 210 patients are required. Data are analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Effectiveness is evaluated using linear regression models with repeated measurements. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and an incremental cost-utility analysis will also be performed. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide insight into the cost-effectiveness of adding exercise therapy to GPs' care in the treatment of OA of the hip. This trial is registered in the Dutch trial registry http://www.trialregister.nl: trial number NTR1462. BioMed Central 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3198764/ /pubmed/21992502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-232 Text en Copyright ©2011 van Es et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van Es, Pauline P
Luijsterburg, Pim AJ
Dekker, Joost
Koopmanschap, Marc A
Bohnen, Arthur M
Verhaar, Jan AN
Koes, Bart W
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita MA
Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy versus general practitioner care for osteoarthritis of the hip: design of a randomised clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-232
work_keys_str_mv AT vanespaulinep costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT luijsterburgpimaj costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT dekkerjoost costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT koopmanschapmarca costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT bohnenarthurm costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT verhaarjanan costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT koesbartw costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT biermazeinstrasitama costeffectivenessofexercisetherapyversusgeneralpractitionercareforosteoarthritisofthehipdesignofarandomisedclinicaltrial