Cargando…

Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management

BACKGROUND: The few studies that have attempted to estimate the future cost of caring for people with dementia in Australia are typically based on total prevalence and the cost per patient over the average duration of illness. However, costs associated with dementia care also vary according to the l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vickland, Victor, Werner, Joel, Morris, Thomas, McDonnell, Geoff, Draper, Brian, Low, Lee-Fay, Brodaty, Henry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21988908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-793
_version_ 1782214510094843904
author Vickland, Victor
Werner, Joel
Morris, Thomas
McDonnell, Geoff
Draper, Brian
Low, Lee-Fay
Brodaty, Henry
author_facet Vickland, Victor
Werner, Joel
Morris, Thomas
McDonnell, Geoff
Draper, Brian
Low, Lee-Fay
Brodaty, Henry
author_sort Vickland, Victor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The few studies that have attempted to estimate the future cost of caring for people with dementia in Australia are typically based on total prevalence and the cost per patient over the average duration of illness. However, costs associated with dementia care also vary according to the length of the disease, severity of symptoms and type of care provided. This study aimed to determine more accurately the future costs of dementia management by taking these factors into consideration. METHODS: The current study estimated the prevalence of dementia in Australia (2010-2040). Data from a variety of sources was recalculated to distribute this prevalence according to the location (home/institution), care requirements (informal/formal), and dementia severity. The cost of care was attributed to redistributed prevalences and used in prediction of future costs of dementia. RESULTS: Our computer modeling indicates that the ratio between the prevalence of people with mild/moderate/severe dementia will change over the three decades from 2010 to 2040 from 50/30/20 to 44/32/24. Taking into account the severity of symptoms, location of care and cost of care per hour, the current study estimates that the informal cost of care in 2010 is AU$3.2 billion and formal care at AU$5.0 billion per annum. By 2040 informal care is estimated to cost AU$11.6 billion and formal care $AU16.7 billion per annum. Interventions to slow disease progression will result in relative savings of 5% (AU$1.5 billion) per annum and interventions to delay disease onset will result in relative savings of 14% (AU$4 billion) of the cost per annum. With no intervention, the projected combined annual cost of formal and informal care for a person with dementia in 2040 will be around AU$38,000 (in 2010 dollars). An intervention to delay progression by 2 years will see this reduced to AU$35,000. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need to account for more than total prevalence when estimating the costs of dementia care. While the absolute values of cost of care estimates are subject to the validity and reliability of currently available data, dynamic systems modeling allows for future trends to be estimated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31989462011-10-24 Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management Vickland, Victor Werner, Joel Morris, Thomas McDonnell, Geoff Draper, Brian Low, Lee-Fay Brodaty, Henry BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The few studies that have attempted to estimate the future cost of caring for people with dementia in Australia are typically based on total prevalence and the cost per patient over the average duration of illness. However, costs associated with dementia care also vary according to the length of the disease, severity of symptoms and type of care provided. This study aimed to determine more accurately the future costs of dementia management by taking these factors into consideration. METHODS: The current study estimated the prevalence of dementia in Australia (2010-2040). Data from a variety of sources was recalculated to distribute this prevalence according to the location (home/institution), care requirements (informal/formal), and dementia severity. The cost of care was attributed to redistributed prevalences and used in prediction of future costs of dementia. RESULTS: Our computer modeling indicates that the ratio between the prevalence of people with mild/moderate/severe dementia will change over the three decades from 2010 to 2040 from 50/30/20 to 44/32/24. Taking into account the severity of symptoms, location of care and cost of care per hour, the current study estimates that the informal cost of care in 2010 is AU$3.2 billion and formal care at AU$5.0 billion per annum. By 2040 informal care is estimated to cost AU$11.6 billion and formal care $AU16.7 billion per annum. Interventions to slow disease progression will result in relative savings of 5% (AU$1.5 billion) per annum and interventions to delay disease onset will result in relative savings of 14% (AU$4 billion) of the cost per annum. With no intervention, the projected combined annual cost of formal and informal care for a person with dementia in 2040 will be around AU$38,000 (in 2010 dollars). An intervention to delay progression by 2 years will see this reduced to AU$35,000. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need to account for more than total prevalence when estimating the costs of dementia care. While the absolute values of cost of care estimates are subject to the validity and reliability of currently available data, dynamic systems modeling allows for future trends to be estimated. BioMed Central 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3198946/ /pubmed/21988908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-793 Text en Copyright ©2011 Vickland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vickland, Victor
Werner, Joel
Morris, Thomas
McDonnell, Geoff
Draper, Brian
Low, Lee-Fay
Brodaty, Henry
Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title_full Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title_fullStr Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title_full_unstemmed Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title_short Who pays and who benefits? How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
title_sort who pays and who benefits? how different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21988908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-793
work_keys_str_mv AT vicklandvictor whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT wernerjoel whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT morristhomas whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT mcdonnellgeoff whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT draperbrian whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT lowleefay whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement
AT brodatyhenry whopaysandwhobenefitshowdifferentmodelsofsharedresponsibilitiesbetweenformalandinformalcarersinfluenceprojectionsofcostsofdementiamanagement