Cargando…

Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations

BACKGROUND: An important objective of evolutionary biology is to understand the processes that govern phenotypic variation in natural populations. We assessed patterns of morphological and genetic divergence among coastal and inland lake populations of nine-spined stickleback in northern Sweden. Coa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mobley, Kenyon B, Lussetti, Daniel, Johansson, Frank, Englund, Göran, Bokma, Folmer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21970590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-287
_version_ 1782214513510055936
author Mobley, Kenyon B
Lussetti, Daniel
Johansson, Frank
Englund, Göran
Bokma, Folmer
author_facet Mobley, Kenyon B
Lussetti, Daniel
Johansson, Frank
Englund, Göran
Bokma, Folmer
author_sort Mobley, Kenyon B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An important objective of evolutionary biology is to understand the processes that govern phenotypic variation in natural populations. We assessed patterns of morphological and genetic divergence among coastal and inland lake populations of nine-spined stickleback in northern Sweden. Coastal populations are either from the Baltic coast (n = 5) or from nearby coastal lakes (n = 3) that became isolated from the Baltic Sea (< 100 years before present, ybp). Inland populations are from freshwater lakes that became isolated from the Baltic approximately 10,000 ybp; either single species lakes without predators (n = 5), or lakes with a recent history of predation (n = 5) from stocking of salmonid predators (~50 ybp). RESULTS: Coastal populations showed little variation in 11 morphological traits and had longer spines per unit of body length than inland populations. Inland populations were larger, on average, and showed greater morphological variation than coastal populations. A principal component analysis (PCA) across all populations revealed two major morphological axes related to spine length (PC1, 47.7% variation) and body size (PC2, 32.9% variation). Analysis of PCA scores showed marked similarity in coastal (Baltic coast and coastal lake) populations. PCA scores indicate that inland populations with predators have higher within-group variance in spine length and lower within-group variance in body size than inland populations without predators. Estimates of within-group P(ST )(a proxy for Q(ST)) from PCA scores are similar to estimates of F(ST )for coastal lake populations but P(ST )>F(ST )for Baltic coast populations. P(ST )>F(ST )for PC1 and PC2 for inland predator and inland no predator populations, with the exception that P(ST )<F(ST )for body size in inland populations lacking predators. CONCLUSIONS: Baltic coast and coastal lake populations show little morphological and genetic variation within and between groups suggesting that these populations experience similar ecological conditions and that time since isolation of coastal lakes has been insufficient to demonstrate divergent morphology in coastal lake populations. Inland populations, on the other hand, showed much greater morphological and genetic variation characteristic of long periods of isolation. Inland populations from lakes without predators generally have larger body size, and smaller spine length relative to body size, suggesting systematic reduction in spine length. In contrast, inland populations with predators exhibit a wider range of spine lengths relative to body size suggesting that this trait is responding to local predation pressure differently among these populations. Taken together the results suggest that predation plays a role in shaping morphological variation among isolated inland populations. However, we cannot rule out that a causal relationship between predation versus other genetic and environmental influences on phenotypic variation not measured in this study exists, and this warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3198969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31989692011-10-24 Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations Mobley, Kenyon B Lussetti, Daniel Johansson, Frank Englund, Göran Bokma, Folmer BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: An important objective of evolutionary biology is to understand the processes that govern phenotypic variation in natural populations. We assessed patterns of morphological and genetic divergence among coastal and inland lake populations of nine-spined stickleback in northern Sweden. Coastal populations are either from the Baltic coast (n = 5) or from nearby coastal lakes (n = 3) that became isolated from the Baltic Sea (< 100 years before present, ybp). Inland populations are from freshwater lakes that became isolated from the Baltic approximately 10,000 ybp; either single species lakes without predators (n = 5), or lakes with a recent history of predation (n = 5) from stocking of salmonid predators (~50 ybp). RESULTS: Coastal populations showed little variation in 11 morphological traits and had longer spines per unit of body length than inland populations. Inland populations were larger, on average, and showed greater morphological variation than coastal populations. A principal component analysis (PCA) across all populations revealed two major morphological axes related to spine length (PC1, 47.7% variation) and body size (PC2, 32.9% variation). Analysis of PCA scores showed marked similarity in coastal (Baltic coast and coastal lake) populations. PCA scores indicate that inland populations with predators have higher within-group variance in spine length and lower within-group variance in body size than inland populations without predators. Estimates of within-group P(ST )(a proxy for Q(ST)) from PCA scores are similar to estimates of F(ST )for coastal lake populations but P(ST )>F(ST )for Baltic coast populations. P(ST )>F(ST )for PC1 and PC2 for inland predator and inland no predator populations, with the exception that P(ST )<F(ST )for body size in inland populations lacking predators. CONCLUSIONS: Baltic coast and coastal lake populations show little morphological and genetic variation within and between groups suggesting that these populations experience similar ecological conditions and that time since isolation of coastal lakes has been insufficient to demonstrate divergent morphology in coastal lake populations. Inland populations, on the other hand, showed much greater morphological and genetic variation characteristic of long periods of isolation. Inland populations from lakes without predators generally have larger body size, and smaller spine length relative to body size, suggesting systematic reduction in spine length. In contrast, inland populations with predators exhibit a wider range of spine lengths relative to body size suggesting that this trait is responding to local predation pressure differently among these populations. Taken together the results suggest that predation plays a role in shaping morphological variation among isolated inland populations. However, we cannot rule out that a causal relationship between predation versus other genetic and environmental influences on phenotypic variation not measured in this study exists, and this warrants further investigation. BioMed Central 2011-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3198969/ /pubmed/21970590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-287 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mobley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mobley, Kenyon B
Lussetti, Daniel
Johansson, Frank
Englund, Göran
Bokma, Folmer
Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title_full Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title_fullStr Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title_full_unstemmed Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title_short Morphological and genetic divergence in Swedish postglacial stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations
title_sort morphological and genetic divergence in swedish postglacial stickleback (pungitius pungitius) populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3198969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21970590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-287
work_keys_str_mv AT mobleykenyonb morphologicalandgeneticdivergenceinswedishpostglacialsticklebackpungitiuspungitiuspopulations
AT lussettidaniel morphologicalandgeneticdivergenceinswedishpostglacialsticklebackpungitiuspungitiuspopulations
AT johanssonfrank morphologicalandgeneticdivergenceinswedishpostglacialsticklebackpungitiuspungitiuspopulations
AT englundgoran morphologicalandgeneticdivergenceinswedishpostglacialsticklebackpungitiuspungitiuspopulations
AT bokmafolmer morphologicalandgeneticdivergenceinswedishpostglacialsticklebackpungitiuspungitiuspopulations