Cargando…

Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for phase I trials (PIT) in oncology is challenging. A typical inclusion criterion for PIT is 'life expectancy > 3 months', however the 90 day mortality (90DM) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced solid malignancies are difficult to predict....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chau, Nicole G, Florescu, Ana, Chan, Kelvin K, Wang, Lisa, Chen, Eric X, Bedard, Philippe, Oza, Amit M, Siu, Lillian L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21975023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-426
_version_ 1782214516915830784
author Chau, Nicole G
Florescu, Ana
Chan, Kelvin K
Wang, Lisa
Chen, Eric X
Bedard, Philippe
Oza, Amit M
Siu, Lillian L
author_facet Chau, Nicole G
Florescu, Ana
Chan, Kelvin K
Wang, Lisa
Chen, Eric X
Bedard, Philippe
Oza, Amit M
Siu, Lillian L
author_sort Chau, Nicole G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient selection for phase I trials (PIT) in oncology is challenging. A typical inclusion criterion for PIT is 'life expectancy > 3 months', however the 90 day mortality (90DM) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced solid malignancies are difficult to predict. METHODS: We analyzed 233 patients who were enrolled in PIT at Princess Margaret Hospital. We assessed the relationship between 17 clinical characteristics and 90DM using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to create a risk score (PMHI). We also applied the Royal Marsden Hospital risk score (RMI), which consists of 3 markers (albumin < 35g/L, > 2 metastatic sites, LDH > ULN). RESULTS: Median age was 57 years (range 21-88). The 90DM rate was 14%; median OS was 320 days. Predictors of 90DM were albumin < 35g/L (OR = 8.2, p = 0.01), > 2 metastatic sites (OR = 2.6, p = 0.02), and ECOG > 0 (OR = 6.3, p = 0.001); all 3 factors constitute the PMHI. To predict 90DM, the PMHI performed better than the RMI (AUC = 0.78 vs 0.69). To predict OS, the RMI performed slightly better (RMI ≥ 2, HR = 2.2, p = 0.002 vs PMHI ≥ 2, HR = 1.6, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To predict 90DM, the PMHI is helpful. To predict OS, risk models should include ECOG > 0, > 2 metastatic sites, and LDH > ULN. Prospective validation of the PMHI is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31990182011-10-23 Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection? Chau, Nicole G Florescu, Ana Chan, Kelvin K Wang, Lisa Chen, Eric X Bedard, Philippe Oza, Amit M Siu, Lillian L BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient selection for phase I trials (PIT) in oncology is challenging. A typical inclusion criterion for PIT is 'life expectancy > 3 months', however the 90 day mortality (90DM) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced solid malignancies are difficult to predict. METHODS: We analyzed 233 patients who were enrolled in PIT at Princess Margaret Hospital. We assessed the relationship between 17 clinical characteristics and 90DM using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to create a risk score (PMHI). We also applied the Royal Marsden Hospital risk score (RMI), which consists of 3 markers (albumin < 35g/L, > 2 metastatic sites, LDH > ULN). RESULTS: Median age was 57 years (range 21-88). The 90DM rate was 14%; median OS was 320 days. Predictors of 90DM were albumin < 35g/L (OR = 8.2, p = 0.01), > 2 metastatic sites (OR = 2.6, p = 0.02), and ECOG > 0 (OR = 6.3, p = 0.001); all 3 factors constitute the PMHI. To predict 90DM, the PMHI performed better than the RMI (AUC = 0.78 vs 0.69). To predict OS, the RMI performed slightly better (RMI ≥ 2, HR = 2.2, p = 0.002 vs PMHI ≥ 2, HR = 1.6, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To predict 90DM, the PMHI is helpful. To predict OS, risk models should include ECOG > 0, > 2 metastatic sites, and LDH > ULN. Prospective validation of the PMHI is warranted. BioMed Central 2011-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3199018/ /pubmed/21975023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-426 Text en Copyright ©2011 Chau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chau, Nicole G
Florescu, Ana
Chan, Kelvin K
Wang, Lisa
Chen, Eric X
Bedard, Philippe
Oza, Amit M
Siu, Lillian L
Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title_full Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title_fullStr Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title_full_unstemmed Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title_short Early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase I trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
title_sort early mortality and overall survival in oncology phase i trial participants: can we improve patient selection?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21975023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-426
work_keys_str_mv AT chaunicoleg earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT florescuana earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT chankelvink earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT wanglisa earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT chenericx earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT bedardphilippe earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT ozaamitm earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection
AT siulillianl earlymortalityandoverallsurvivalinoncologyphaseitrialparticipantscanweimprovepatientselection