Cargando…

Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels

Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Carley, Lowenstein, Lior, Mueller, Elizabeth, Brubaker, Linda, Kenton, Kimberly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915
_version_ 1782214542178123776
author Davis, Carley
Lowenstein, Lior
Mueller, Elizabeth
Brubaker, Linda
Kenton, Kimberly
author_facet Davis, Carley
Lowenstein, Lior
Mueller, Elizabeth
Brubaker, Linda
Kenton, Kimberly
author_sort Davis, Carley
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz (corresponding to A-β, A-δ, and C fibers, resp.) both pre- and postoperatively. Threshold values were obtained in all patients by using the method of limits and the method of levels. Results. CPT values obtained by using the method of levels and the methods of limits were highly correlated at all frequencies before and after surgery (ρ = 0.93–0.99, P < 0.0001). The mean threshold values obtained by the method of levels were significantly lower at all frequencies compared with those obtained by the method of limits. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the method of levels is more sensitive for the detection of CPTs compared to the method of limits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31992052011-11-01 Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels Davis, Carley Lowenstein, Lior Mueller, Elizabeth Brubaker, Linda Kenton, Kimberly Obstet Gynecol Int Clinical Study Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz (corresponding to A-β, A-δ, and C fibers, resp.) both pre- and postoperatively. Threshold values were obtained in all patients by using the method of limits and the method of levels. Results. CPT values obtained by using the method of levels and the methods of limits were highly correlated at all frequencies before and after surgery (ρ = 0.93–0.99, P < 0.0001). The mean threshold values obtained by the method of levels were significantly lower at all frequencies compared with those obtained by the method of limits. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the method of levels is more sensitive for the detection of CPTs compared to the method of limits. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3199205/ /pubmed/22046190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915 Text en Copyright © 2012 Carley Davis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Davis, Carley
Lowenstein, Lior
Mueller, Elizabeth
Brubaker, Linda
Kenton, Kimberly
Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title_full Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title_fullStr Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title_short Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
title_sort measuring urinary sensation with current perception threshold: a comparison between method of limits and method of levels
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915
work_keys_str_mv AT daviscarley measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels
AT lowensteinlior measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels
AT muellerelizabeth measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels
AT brubakerlinda measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels
AT kentonkimberly measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels