Cargando…
Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels
Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915 |
_version_ | 1782214542178123776 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Carley Lowenstein, Lior Mueller, Elizabeth Brubaker, Linda Kenton, Kimberly |
author_facet | Davis, Carley Lowenstein, Lior Mueller, Elizabeth Brubaker, Linda Kenton, Kimberly |
author_sort | Davis, Carley |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz (corresponding to A-β, A-δ, and C fibers, resp.) both pre- and postoperatively. Threshold values were obtained in all patients by using the method of limits and the method of levels. Results. CPT values obtained by using the method of levels and the methods of limits were highly correlated at all frequencies before and after surgery (ρ = 0.93–0.99, P < 0.0001). The mean threshold values obtained by the method of levels were significantly lower at all frequencies compared with those obtained by the method of limits. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the method of levels is more sensitive for the detection of CPTs compared to the method of limits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3199205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31992052011-11-01 Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels Davis, Carley Lowenstein, Lior Mueller, Elizabeth Brubaker, Linda Kenton, Kimberly Obstet Gynecol Int Clinical Study Purpose. To determine the association between the two methods of obtaining current perception thresholds (CPTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT). Materials and Methods. Twenty-one women undergoing pelvic surgery underwent CPT determinations of the urethra. CPTs were measured at 2,000, 250, and 5 Hz (corresponding to A-β, A-δ, and C fibers, resp.) both pre- and postoperatively. Threshold values were obtained in all patients by using the method of limits and the method of levels. Results. CPT values obtained by using the method of levels and the methods of limits were highly correlated at all frequencies before and after surgery (ρ = 0.93–0.99, P < 0.0001). The mean threshold values obtained by the method of levels were significantly lower at all frequencies compared with those obtained by the method of limits. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the method of levels is more sensitive for the detection of CPTs compared to the method of limits. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3199205/ /pubmed/22046190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915 Text en Copyright © 2012 Carley Davis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Davis, Carley Lowenstein, Lior Mueller, Elizabeth Brubaker, Linda Kenton, Kimberly Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold: A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title | Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:
A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title_full | Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:
A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title_fullStr | Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:
A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:
A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title_short | Measuring Urinary Sensation with Current Perception Threshold:
A Comparison between Method of Limits and Method of Levels |
title_sort | measuring urinary sensation with current perception threshold:
a comparison between method of limits and method of levels |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/868915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviscarley measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels AT lowensteinlior measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels AT muellerelizabeth measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels AT brubakerlinda measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels AT kentonkimberly measuringurinarysensationwithcurrentperceptionthresholdacomparisonbetweenmethodoflimitsandmethodoflevels |