Cargando…

Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle

BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major clinical challenge. We developed a model to diagnose IPF by applying Bayesian probit regression (BPR) modelling to gene expression profiles of whole lung tissue. METHODS: Whole lung tissue was obtained from patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meltzer, Eric B, Barry, William T, D'Amico, Thomas A, Davis, Robert D, Lin, Shu S, Onaitis, Mark W, Morrison, Lake D, Sporn, Thomas A, Steele, Mark P, Noble, Paul W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21974901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-70
_version_ 1782214544656957440
author Meltzer, Eric B
Barry, William T
D'Amico, Thomas A
Davis, Robert D
Lin, Shu S
Onaitis, Mark W
Morrison, Lake D
Sporn, Thomas A
Steele, Mark P
Noble, Paul W
author_facet Meltzer, Eric B
Barry, William T
D'Amico, Thomas A
Davis, Robert D
Lin, Shu S
Onaitis, Mark W
Morrison, Lake D
Sporn, Thomas A
Steele, Mark P
Noble, Paul W
author_sort Meltzer, Eric B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major clinical challenge. We developed a model to diagnose IPF by applying Bayesian probit regression (BPR) modelling to gene expression profiles of whole lung tissue. METHODS: Whole lung tissue was obtained from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing surgical lung biopsy or lung transplantation. Controls were obtained from normal organ donors. We performed cluster analyses to explore differences in our dataset. No significant difference was found between samples obtained from different lobes of the same patient. A significant difference was found between samples obtained at biopsy versus explant. Following preliminary analysis of the complete dataset, we selected three subsets for the development of diagnostic gene signatures: the first signature was developed from all IPF samples (as compared to controls); the second signature was developed from the subset of IPF samples obtained at biopsy; the third signature was developed from IPF explants. To assess the validity of each signature, we used an independent cohort of IPF and normal samples. Each signature was used to predict phenotype (IPF versus normal) in samples from the validation cohort. We compared the models' predictions to the true phenotype of each validation sample, and then calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. RESULTS: Surprisingly, we found that all three signatures were reasonably valid predictors of diagnosis, with small differences in test sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first use of BPR on whole lung tissue; previously, BPR was primarily used to develop predictive models for cancer. This also represents the first report of an independently validated IPF gene expression signature. In summary, BPR is a promising tool for the development of gene expression signatures from non-neoplastic lung tissue. In the future, BPR might be used to develop definitive diagnostic gene signatures for IPF, prognostic gene signatures for IPF or gene signatures for other non-neoplastic lung disorders such as bronchiolitis obliterans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31992302011-10-24 Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle Meltzer, Eric B Barry, William T D'Amico, Thomas A Davis, Robert D Lin, Shu S Onaitis, Mark W Morrison, Lake D Sporn, Thomas A Steele, Mark P Noble, Paul W BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major clinical challenge. We developed a model to diagnose IPF by applying Bayesian probit regression (BPR) modelling to gene expression profiles of whole lung tissue. METHODS: Whole lung tissue was obtained from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing surgical lung biopsy or lung transplantation. Controls were obtained from normal organ donors. We performed cluster analyses to explore differences in our dataset. No significant difference was found between samples obtained from different lobes of the same patient. A significant difference was found between samples obtained at biopsy versus explant. Following preliminary analysis of the complete dataset, we selected three subsets for the development of diagnostic gene signatures: the first signature was developed from all IPF samples (as compared to controls); the second signature was developed from the subset of IPF samples obtained at biopsy; the third signature was developed from IPF explants. To assess the validity of each signature, we used an independent cohort of IPF and normal samples. Each signature was used to predict phenotype (IPF versus normal) in samples from the validation cohort. We compared the models' predictions to the true phenotype of each validation sample, and then calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. RESULTS: Surprisingly, we found that all three signatures were reasonably valid predictors of diagnosis, with small differences in test sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first use of BPR on whole lung tissue; previously, BPR was primarily used to develop predictive models for cancer. This also represents the first report of an independently validated IPF gene expression signature. In summary, BPR is a promising tool for the development of gene expression signatures from non-neoplastic lung tissue. In the future, BPR might be used to develop definitive diagnostic gene signatures for IPF, prognostic gene signatures for IPF or gene signatures for other non-neoplastic lung disorders such as bronchiolitis obliterans. BioMed Central 2011-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3199230/ /pubmed/21974901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-70 Text en Copyright ©2011 Meltzer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meltzer, Eric B
Barry, William T
D'Amico, Thomas A
Davis, Robert D
Lin, Shu S
Onaitis, Mark W
Morrison, Lake D
Sporn, Thomas A
Steele, Mark P
Noble, Paul W
Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title_full Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title_fullStr Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title_short Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
title_sort bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21974901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-70
work_keys_str_mv AT meltzerericb bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT barrywilliamt bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT damicothomasa bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT davisrobertd bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT linshus bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT onaitismarkw bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT morrisonlaked bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT spornthomasa bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT steelemarkp bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple
AT noblepaulw bayesianprobitregressionmodelforthediagnosisofpulmonaryfibrosisproofofprinciple