Cargando…

A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study

BACKGROUND: Knowing the risk factors of CKD should be able to identify at risk populations. We thus aimed to develop and validate a simplified clinical prediction score capable of indicating those at risk. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional survey study was conducted. Ten provinces and 20 di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakkinstian, Ammarin, Ingsathit, Atiporn, Chaiprasert, Amnart, Rattanasiri, Sasivimol, Sangthawan, Pornpen, Gojaseni, Pongsathorn, Kiattisunthorn, Kriwiporn, Ongaiyooth, Leena, Thirakhupt, Prapaipim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-45
_version_ 1782214545776836608
author Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Ingsathit, Atiporn
Chaiprasert, Amnart
Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
Sangthawan, Pornpen
Gojaseni, Pongsathorn
Kiattisunthorn, Kriwiporn
Ongaiyooth, Leena
Thirakhupt, Prapaipim
author_facet Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Ingsathit, Atiporn
Chaiprasert, Amnart
Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
Sangthawan, Pornpen
Gojaseni, Pongsathorn
Kiattisunthorn, Kriwiporn
Ongaiyooth, Leena
Thirakhupt, Prapaipim
author_sort Thakkinstian, Ammarin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowing the risk factors of CKD should be able to identify at risk populations. We thus aimed to develop and validate a simplified clinical prediction score capable of indicating those at risk. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional survey study was conducted. Ten provinces and 20 districts were stratified-cluster randomly selected across four regions in Thailand and Bangkok. The outcome of interest was chronic kidney disease stage I to V versus non-CKD. Logistic regression was applied to assess the risk factors. Scoring was created using odds ratios of significant variables. The ROC curve analysis was used to calibrate the cut-off of the scores. Bootstrap was applied to internally validate the performance of this prediction score. RESULTS: Three-thousand, four-hundred and fifty-nine subjects were included to derive the prediction scores. Four (i.e., age, diabetes, hypertension, and history of kidney stones) were significantly associated with the CKD. Total scores ranged from 4 to 16 and the score discrimination was 77.0%. The scores of 4-5, 6-8, 9-11, and ≥ 12 correspond to low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high probabilities of CKD with the likelihood ratio positive (LR(+)) of 1, 2.5 (95% CI: 2.2-2.7), 4.9 (95% CI: 3.9 - 6.3), and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.6 - 10.1), respectively. Internal validity was performed using 200 repetitions of a bootstrap technique. Calibration was assessed and the difference between observed and predicted values was 0.045. The concordance C statistic of the derivative and validated models were similar, i.e., 0.770 and 0.741. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified clinical prediction score for estimating risk of having CKD was created. The prediction score may be useful in identifying and classifying at riskpatients. However, further external validation is needed to confirm this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31992352011-10-24 A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study Thakkinstian, Ammarin Ingsathit, Atiporn Chaiprasert, Amnart Rattanasiri, Sasivimol Sangthawan, Pornpen Gojaseni, Pongsathorn Kiattisunthorn, Kriwiporn Ongaiyooth, Leena Thirakhupt, Prapaipim BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Knowing the risk factors of CKD should be able to identify at risk populations. We thus aimed to develop and validate a simplified clinical prediction score capable of indicating those at risk. METHODS: A community-based cross-sectional survey study was conducted. Ten provinces and 20 districts were stratified-cluster randomly selected across four regions in Thailand and Bangkok. The outcome of interest was chronic kidney disease stage I to V versus non-CKD. Logistic regression was applied to assess the risk factors. Scoring was created using odds ratios of significant variables. The ROC curve analysis was used to calibrate the cut-off of the scores. Bootstrap was applied to internally validate the performance of this prediction score. RESULTS: Three-thousand, four-hundred and fifty-nine subjects were included to derive the prediction scores. Four (i.e., age, diabetes, hypertension, and history of kidney stones) were significantly associated with the CKD. Total scores ranged from 4 to 16 and the score discrimination was 77.0%. The scores of 4-5, 6-8, 9-11, and ≥ 12 correspond to low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high probabilities of CKD with the likelihood ratio positive (LR(+)) of 1, 2.5 (95% CI: 2.2-2.7), 4.9 (95% CI: 3.9 - 6.3), and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.6 - 10.1), respectively. Internal validity was performed using 200 repetitions of a bootstrap technique. Calibration was assessed and the difference between observed and predicted values was 0.045. The concordance C statistic of the derivative and validated models were similar, i.e., 0.770 and 0.741. CONCLUSIONS: A simplified clinical prediction score for estimating risk of having CKD was created. The prediction score may be useful in identifying and classifying at riskpatients. However, further external validation is needed to confirm this. BioMed Central 2011-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3199235/ /pubmed/21943205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-45 Text en Copyright ©2011 Thakkinstian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thakkinstian, Ammarin
Ingsathit, Atiporn
Chaiprasert, Amnart
Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
Sangthawan, Pornpen
Gojaseni, Pongsathorn
Kiattisunthorn, Kriwiporn
Ongaiyooth, Leena
Thirakhupt, Prapaipim
A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title_full A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title_fullStr A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title_full_unstemmed A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title_short A simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional-survey study
title_sort simplified clinical prediction score of chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional-survey study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21943205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-12-45
work_keys_str_mv AT thakkinstianammarin asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT ingsathitatiporn asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT chaiprasertamnart asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT rattanasirisasivimol asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT sangthawanpornpen asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT gojasenipongsathorn asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT kiattisunthornkriwiporn asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT ongaiyoothleena asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT thirakhuptprapaipim asimplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT thakkinstianammarin simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT ingsathitatiporn simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT chaiprasertamnart simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT rattanasirisasivimol simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT sangthawanpornpen simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT gojasenipongsathorn simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT kiattisunthornkriwiporn simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT ongaiyoothleena simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT thirakhuptprapaipim simplifiedclinicalpredictionscoreofchronickidneydiseaseacrosssectionalsurveystudy