Cargando…
Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21981910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390 |
_version_ | 1782214552693243904 |
---|---|
author | Braithwaite, Jeffrey Westbrook, Johanna Johnston, Brian Clark, Stephen Brandon, Mark Banks, Margaret Hughes, Clifford Greenfield, David Pawsey, Marjorie Corbett, Angus Georgiou, Andrew Callen, Joanne Øvretveit, John Pope, Catherine Suñol, Rosa Shaw, Charles Debono, Deborah Westbrook, Mary Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max |
author_facet | Braithwaite, Jeffrey Westbrook, Johanna Johnston, Brian Clark, Stephen Brandon, Mark Banks, Margaret Hughes, Clifford Greenfield, David Pawsey, Marjorie Corbett, Angus Georgiou, Andrew Callen, Joanne Øvretveit, John Pope, Catherine Suñol, Rosa Shaw, Charles Debono, Deborah Westbrook, Mary Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max |
author_sort | Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. FINDINGS: We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. DISCUSSION: The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3199265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31992652011-10-24 Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol Braithwaite, Jeffrey Westbrook, Johanna Johnston, Brian Clark, Stephen Brandon, Mark Banks, Margaret Hughes, Clifford Greenfield, David Pawsey, Marjorie Corbett, Angus Georgiou, Andrew Callen, Joanne Øvretveit, John Pope, Catherine Suñol, Rosa Shaw, Charles Debono, Deborah Westbrook, Mary Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max BMC Res Notes Project Note BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. FINDINGS: We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. DISCUSSION: The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009] BioMed Central 2011-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3199265/ /pubmed/21981910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390 Text en Copyright ©2011 Braithwaite et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Project Note Braithwaite, Jeffrey Westbrook, Johanna Johnston, Brian Clark, Stephen Brandon, Mark Banks, Margaret Hughes, Clifford Greenfield, David Pawsey, Marjorie Corbett, Angus Georgiou, Andrew Callen, Joanne Øvretveit, John Pope, Catherine Suñol, Rosa Shaw, Charles Debono, Deborah Westbrook, Mary Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title | Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title_full | Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title_fullStr | Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title_short | Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol |
title_sort | strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the accredit project study protocol |
topic | Project Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21981910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braithwaitejeffrey strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT westbrookjohanna strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT johnstonbrian strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT clarkstephen strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT brandonmark strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT banksmargaret strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT hughesclifford strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT greenfielddavid strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT pawseymarjorie strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT corbettangus strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT georgiouandrew strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT callenjoanne strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT øvretveitjohn strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT popecatherine strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT sunolrosa strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT shawcharles strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT debonodeborah strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT westbrookmary strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT hinchcliffreece strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol AT moldovanmax strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol |