Cargando…

Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol

BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braithwaite, Jeffrey, Westbrook, Johanna, Johnston, Brian, Clark, Stephen, Brandon, Mark, Banks, Margaret, Hughes, Clifford, Greenfield, David, Pawsey, Marjorie, Corbett, Angus, Georgiou, Andrew, Callen, Joanne, Øvretveit, John, Pope, Catherine, Suñol, Rosa, Shaw, Charles, Debono, Deborah, Westbrook, Mary, Hinchcliff, Reece, Moldovan, Max
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21981910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390
_version_ 1782214552693243904
author Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Westbrook, Johanna
Johnston, Brian
Clark, Stephen
Brandon, Mark
Banks, Margaret
Hughes, Clifford
Greenfield, David
Pawsey, Marjorie
Corbett, Angus
Georgiou, Andrew
Callen, Joanne
Øvretveit, John
Pope, Catherine
Suñol, Rosa
Shaw, Charles
Debono, Deborah
Westbrook, Mary
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
author_facet Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Westbrook, Johanna
Johnston, Brian
Clark, Stephen
Brandon, Mark
Banks, Margaret
Hughes, Clifford
Greenfield, David
Pawsey, Marjorie
Corbett, Angus
Georgiou, Andrew
Callen, Joanne
Øvretveit, John
Pope, Catherine
Suñol, Rosa
Shaw, Charles
Debono, Deborah
Westbrook, Mary
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
author_sort Braithwaite, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. FINDINGS: We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. DISCUSSION: The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31992652011-10-24 Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol Braithwaite, Jeffrey Westbrook, Johanna Johnston, Brian Clark, Stephen Brandon, Mark Banks, Margaret Hughes, Clifford Greenfield, David Pawsey, Marjorie Corbett, Angus Georgiou, Andrew Callen, Joanne Øvretveit, John Pope, Catherine Suñol, Rosa Shaw, Charles Debono, Deborah Westbrook, Mary Hinchcliff, Reece Moldovan, Max BMC Res Notes Project Note BACKGROUND: Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base. In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies. FINDINGS: We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design. DISCUSSION: The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers. "Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009] BioMed Central 2011-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3199265/ /pubmed/21981910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390 Text en Copyright ©2011 Braithwaite et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Project Note
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Westbrook, Johanna
Johnston, Brian
Clark, Stephen
Brandon, Mark
Banks, Margaret
Hughes, Clifford
Greenfield, David
Pawsey, Marjorie
Corbett, Angus
Georgiou, Andrew
Callen, Joanne
Øvretveit, John
Pope, Catherine
Suñol, Rosa
Shaw, Charles
Debono, Deborah
Westbrook, Mary
Hinchcliff, Reece
Moldovan, Max
Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title_full Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title_fullStr Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title_short Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
title_sort strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the accredit project study protocol
topic Project Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21981910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-390
work_keys_str_mv AT braithwaitejeffrey strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT westbrookjohanna strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT johnstonbrian strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT clarkstephen strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT brandonmark strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT banksmargaret strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT hughesclifford strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT greenfielddavid strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT pawseymarjorie strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT corbettangus strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT georgiouandrew strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT callenjoanne strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT øvretveitjohn strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT popecatherine strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT sunolrosa strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT shawcharles strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT debonodeborah strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT westbrookmary strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT hinchcliffreece strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol
AT moldovanmax strengtheningorganizationalperformancethroughaccreditationresearchaframeworkfortwelveinterrelatedstudiestheaccreditprojectstudyprotocol