Cargando…

Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction

Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neumann, Andreas, Kevenhoerster, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060
_version_ 1782214603122409472
author Neumann, Andreas
Kevenhoerster, Kevin
author_facet Neumann, Andreas
Kevenhoerster, Kevin
author_sort Neumann, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for dental implants or aesthetic augmentations in the facial region. For ostheosynthesis, mini- and microplates made from titanium alloys provide major advantages concerning biocompatibility, stability and individual fitting to the implant bed. The necessity of removing asymptomatic plates and screws after fracture healing is still a controversial issue. Risks and costs of secondary surgery for removal face a low rate of complications (due to corrosion products) when the material remains in situ. Resorbable osteosynthesis systems have similar mechanical stability and are especially useful in the growing skull. The huge variety of biomaterials for the reconstruction of bony defects makes it difficult to decide which material is adequate for which indication and for which site. The optimal biomaterial that meets every requirement (e.g. biocompatibility, stability, intraoperative fitting, product safety, low costs etc.) does not exist. The different material types are (autogenic) bone and many alloplastics such as metals (mainly titanium), ceramics, plastics and composites. Future developments aim to improve physical and biological properties, especially regarding surface interactions. To date, tissue engineered bone is far from routine clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3199817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31998172011-11-09 Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction Neumann, Andreas Kevenhoerster, Kevin GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Article Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for dental implants or aesthetic augmentations in the facial region. For ostheosynthesis, mini- and microplates made from titanium alloys provide major advantages concerning biocompatibility, stability and individual fitting to the implant bed. The necessity of removing asymptomatic plates and screws after fracture healing is still a controversial issue. Risks and costs of secondary surgery for removal face a low rate of complications (due to corrosion products) when the material remains in situ. Resorbable osteosynthesis systems have similar mechanical stability and are especially useful in the growing skull. The huge variety of biomaterials for the reconstruction of bony defects makes it difficult to decide which material is adequate for which indication and for which site. The optimal biomaterial that meets every requirement (e.g. biocompatibility, stability, intraoperative fitting, product safety, low costs etc.) does not exist. The different material types are (autogenic) bone and many alloplastics such as metals (mainly titanium), ceramics, plastics and composites. Future developments aim to improve physical and biological properties, especially regarding surface interactions. To date, tissue engineered bone is far from routine clinical application. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3199817/ /pubmed/22073101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060 Text en Copyright © 2011 Neumann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Neumann, Andreas
Kevenhoerster, Kevin
Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title_full Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title_fullStr Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title_short Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
title_sort biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073101
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060
work_keys_str_mv AT neumannandreas biomaterialsforcraniofacialreconstruction
AT kevenhoersterkevin biomaterialsforcraniofacialreconstruction