Cargando…
Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction
Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for de...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060 |
_version_ | 1782214603122409472 |
---|---|
author | Neumann, Andreas Kevenhoerster, Kevin |
author_facet | Neumann, Andreas Kevenhoerster, Kevin |
author_sort | Neumann, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for dental implants or aesthetic augmentations in the facial region. For ostheosynthesis, mini- and microplates made from titanium alloys provide major advantages concerning biocompatibility, stability and individual fitting to the implant bed. The necessity of removing asymptomatic plates and screws after fracture healing is still a controversial issue. Risks and costs of secondary surgery for removal face a low rate of complications (due to corrosion products) when the material remains in situ. Resorbable osteosynthesis systems have similar mechanical stability and are especially useful in the growing skull. The huge variety of biomaterials for the reconstruction of bony defects makes it difficult to decide which material is adequate for which indication and for which site. The optimal biomaterial that meets every requirement (e.g. biocompatibility, stability, intraoperative fitting, product safety, low costs etc.) does not exist. The different material types are (autogenic) bone and many alloplastics such as metals (mainly titanium), ceramics, plastics and composites. Future developments aim to improve physical and biological properties, especially regarding surface interactions. To date, tissue engineered bone is far from routine clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3199817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31998172011-11-09 Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction Neumann, Andreas Kevenhoerster, Kevin GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Article Biomaterials for reconstruction of bony defects of the skull comprise of osteosynthetic materials applied after osteotomies or traumatic fractures and materials to fill bony defects which result from malformation, trauma or tumor resections. Other applications concern functional augmentations for dental implants or aesthetic augmentations in the facial region. For ostheosynthesis, mini- and microplates made from titanium alloys provide major advantages concerning biocompatibility, stability and individual fitting to the implant bed. The necessity of removing asymptomatic plates and screws after fracture healing is still a controversial issue. Risks and costs of secondary surgery for removal face a low rate of complications (due to corrosion products) when the material remains in situ. Resorbable osteosynthesis systems have similar mechanical stability and are especially useful in the growing skull. The huge variety of biomaterials for the reconstruction of bony defects makes it difficult to decide which material is adequate for which indication and for which site. The optimal biomaterial that meets every requirement (e.g. biocompatibility, stability, intraoperative fitting, product safety, low costs etc.) does not exist. The different material types are (autogenic) bone and many alloplastics such as metals (mainly titanium), ceramics, plastics and composites. Future developments aim to improve physical and biological properties, especially regarding surface interactions. To date, tissue engineered bone is far from routine clinical application. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2011-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3199817/ /pubmed/22073101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060 Text en Copyright © 2011 Neumann et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Neumann, Andreas Kevenhoerster, Kevin Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title | Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title_full | Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title_short | Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
title_sort | biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3199817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22073101 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/cto000060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neumannandreas biomaterialsforcraniofacialreconstruction AT kevenhoersterkevin biomaterialsforcraniofacialreconstruction |