Cargando…

Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The concept of benefit sharing to enhance the social value of global health research in resource poor settings is now a key strategy for addressing moral issues of relevance to individuals, communities and host countries in resource poor settings when they participate in international co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lairumbi, Geoffrey M, Parker, Michael, Fitzpatrick, Raymond, Mike, English C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-20
_version_ 1782214660989124608
author Lairumbi, Geoffrey M
Parker, Michael
Fitzpatrick, Raymond
Mike, English C
author_facet Lairumbi, Geoffrey M
Parker, Michael
Fitzpatrick, Raymond
Mike, English C
author_sort Lairumbi, Geoffrey M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of benefit sharing to enhance the social value of global health research in resource poor settings is now a key strategy for addressing moral issues of relevance to individuals, communities and host countries in resource poor settings when they participate in international collaborative health research. The influence of benefit sharing framework on the conduct of collaborative health research is for instance evidenced by the number of publications and research ethics guidelines that require prior engagement between stakeholders to determine the social value of research to the host communities. While such efforts as the production of international guidance on how to promote the social value of research through such strategies as benefit sharing have been made, the extent to which these ideas and guidelines have been absorbed by those engaged in global health research especially in resource poor settings remains unclear. We examine this awareness among stakeholders involved in health related research in Kenya. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with key informants drawn from within the broader health research system in Kenya including researchers from the mainstream health research institutions, networks and universities, teaching hospitals, policy makers, institutional review boards, civil society organisations and community representative groups. RESULTS: Our study suggests that although people have a sense of justice and the moral aspects of research, this was not articulated in terms used in the literature and the guidelines on the ethics of global health research. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that while in theory several efforts can be made to address the moral issues of concern to research participants and their communities in resource poor settings, quick fixes such as benefit sharing are not going to be straightforward. We suggest a need to pay closer attention to the processes through which ethical principles are enacted in practice and distil lessons on how best to involve individuals and communities in promoting ethical conduct of global health research in resource poor settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3200159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32001592011-10-25 Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study Lairumbi, Geoffrey M Parker, Michael Fitzpatrick, Raymond Mike, English C BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: The concept of benefit sharing to enhance the social value of global health research in resource poor settings is now a key strategy for addressing moral issues of relevance to individuals, communities and host countries in resource poor settings when they participate in international collaborative health research. The influence of benefit sharing framework on the conduct of collaborative health research is for instance evidenced by the number of publications and research ethics guidelines that require prior engagement between stakeholders to determine the social value of research to the host communities. While such efforts as the production of international guidance on how to promote the social value of research through such strategies as benefit sharing have been made, the extent to which these ideas and guidelines have been absorbed by those engaged in global health research especially in resource poor settings remains unclear. We examine this awareness among stakeholders involved in health related research in Kenya. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews with key informants drawn from within the broader health research system in Kenya including researchers from the mainstream health research institutions, networks and universities, teaching hospitals, policy makers, institutional review boards, civil society organisations and community representative groups. RESULTS: Our study suggests that although people have a sense of justice and the moral aspects of research, this was not articulated in terms used in the literature and the guidelines on the ethics of global health research. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that while in theory several efforts can be made to address the moral issues of concern to research participants and their communities in resource poor settings, quick fixes such as benefit sharing are not going to be straightforward. We suggest a need to pay closer attention to the processes through which ethical principles are enacted in practice and distil lessons on how best to involve individuals and communities in promoting ethical conduct of global health research in resource poor settings. BioMed Central 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3200159/ /pubmed/21961798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lairumbi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lairumbi, Geoffrey M
Parker, Michael
Fitzpatrick, Raymond
Mike, English C
Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title_full Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title_short Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: a qualitative study
title_sort stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in kenya: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-12-20
work_keys_str_mv AT lairumbigeoffreym stakeholdersunderstandingoftheconceptofbenefitsharinginhealthresearchinkenyaaqualitativestudy
AT parkermichael stakeholdersunderstandingoftheconceptofbenefitsharinginhealthresearchinkenyaaqualitativestudy
AT fitzpatrickraymond stakeholdersunderstandingoftheconceptofbenefitsharinginhealthresearchinkenyaaqualitativestudy
AT mikeenglishc stakeholdersunderstandingoftheconceptofbenefitsharinginhealthresearchinkenyaaqualitativestudy