Cargando…

The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure

BACKGROUND: Shiatsu, similar to acupressure, uses finger pressure, manipulations and stretches, along Traditional Chinese Medicine meridians. Shiatsu is popular in Europe, but lacks reviews on its evidence-base. METHODS: Acupressure and Shiatsu clinical trials were identified using the MeSH term �...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Nicola, Lorenc, Ava, Liao, Xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-88
_version_ 1782214663946108928
author Robinson, Nicola
Lorenc, Ava
Liao, Xing
author_facet Robinson, Nicola
Lorenc, Ava
Liao, Xing
author_sort Robinson, Nicola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shiatsu, similar to acupressure, uses finger pressure, manipulations and stretches, along Traditional Chinese Medicine meridians. Shiatsu is popular in Europe, but lacks reviews on its evidence-base. METHODS: Acupressure and Shiatsu clinical trials were identified using the MeSH term 'acupressure' in: EBM reviews; AMED; BNI; CINAHL; EMBASE; MEDLINE; PsycARTICLES; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Ingenta Select; Wiley Interscience; Index to Theses and ZETOC. References of articles were checked. Inclusion criteria were Shiatsu or acupressure administered manually/bodily, published after January 1990. Two reviewers performed independent study selection and evaluation of study design and reporting, using standardised checklists (CONSORT, TREND, CASP and STRICTA). RESULTS: Searches identified 1714 publications. Final inclusions were 9 Shiatsu and 71 acupressure studies. A quarter were graded A (highest quality). Shiatsu studies comprised 1 RCT, three controlled non-randomised, one within-subjects, one observational and 3 uncontrolled studies investigating mental and physical health issues. Evidence was of insufficient quantity and quality. Acupressure studies included 2 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews and 39 RCTs. Strongest evidence was for pain (particularly dysmenorrhoea, lower back and labour), post-operative nausea and vomiting. Additionally quality evidence found improvements in sleep in institutionalised elderly. Variable/poor quality evidence existed for renal disease symptoms, dementia, stress, anxiety and respiratory conditions. Appraisal tools may be inappropriate for some study designs. Potential biases included focus on UK/USA databases, limited grey literature, and exclusion of qualitative and pre-1989 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is improving in quantity, quality and reporting, but more research is needed, particularly for Shiatsu, where evidence is poor. Acupressure may be beneficial for pain, nausea and vomiting and sleep.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3200172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32001722011-10-25 The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure Robinson, Nicola Lorenc, Ava Liao, Xing BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Shiatsu, similar to acupressure, uses finger pressure, manipulations and stretches, along Traditional Chinese Medicine meridians. Shiatsu is popular in Europe, but lacks reviews on its evidence-base. METHODS: Acupressure and Shiatsu clinical trials were identified using the MeSH term 'acupressure' in: EBM reviews; AMED; BNI; CINAHL; EMBASE; MEDLINE; PsycARTICLES; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Ingenta Select; Wiley Interscience; Index to Theses and ZETOC. References of articles were checked. Inclusion criteria were Shiatsu or acupressure administered manually/bodily, published after January 1990. Two reviewers performed independent study selection and evaluation of study design and reporting, using standardised checklists (CONSORT, TREND, CASP and STRICTA). RESULTS: Searches identified 1714 publications. Final inclusions were 9 Shiatsu and 71 acupressure studies. A quarter were graded A (highest quality). Shiatsu studies comprised 1 RCT, three controlled non-randomised, one within-subjects, one observational and 3 uncontrolled studies investigating mental and physical health issues. Evidence was of insufficient quantity and quality. Acupressure studies included 2 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews and 39 RCTs. Strongest evidence was for pain (particularly dysmenorrhoea, lower back and labour), post-operative nausea and vomiting. Additionally quality evidence found improvements in sleep in institutionalised elderly. Variable/poor quality evidence existed for renal disease symptoms, dementia, stress, anxiety and respiratory conditions. Appraisal tools may be inappropriate for some study designs. Potential biases included focus on UK/USA databases, limited grey literature, and exclusion of qualitative and pre-1989 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is improving in quantity, quality and reporting, but more research is needed, particularly for Shiatsu, where evidence is poor. Acupressure may be beneficial for pain, nausea and vomiting and sleep. BioMed Central 2011-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3200172/ /pubmed/21982157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-88 Text en Copyright ©2011 Robinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Robinson, Nicola
Lorenc, Ava
Liao, Xing
The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title_full The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title_fullStr The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title_full_unstemmed The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title_short The evidence for Shiatsu: a systematic review of Shiatsu and acupressure
title_sort evidence for shiatsu: a systematic review of shiatsu and acupressure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-88
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonnicola theevidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure
AT lorencava theevidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure
AT liaoxing theevidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure
AT robinsonnicola evidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure
AT lorencava evidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure
AT liaoxing evidenceforshiatsuasystematicreviewofshiatsuandacupressure