Cargando…

Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases

Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate initial learning curves of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with regard to complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imamoto, Takashi, Goto, Yusuke, Utsumi, Takanobu, Fuse, Miki, Kawamura, Koji, Kamiya, Naoto, Naya, Yukio, Suzuki, Hiroyoshi, Kondo, Yukihiro, Ichikawa, Tomohiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/606505
_version_ 1782214679600300032
author Imamoto, Takashi
Goto, Yusuke
Utsumi, Takanobu
Fuse, Miki
Kawamura, Koji
Kamiya, Naoto
Naya, Yukio
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
Kondo, Yukihiro
Ichikawa, Tomohiko
author_facet Imamoto, Takashi
Goto, Yusuke
Utsumi, Takanobu
Fuse, Miki
Kawamura, Koji
Kamiya, Naoto
Naya, Yukio
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
Kondo, Yukihiro
Ichikawa, Tomohiko
author_sort Imamoto, Takashi
collection PubMed
description Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate initial learning curves of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with regard to complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. All 100 patients underwent LRP performed by the same urologist at one institution. Results: Mean operating time (208.4 ± 48.6 min), estimated blood loss (495.8 ± 436.5 mL), allogeneic blood transfusion rate (0%), and intraoperative complications diminished with surgical experience. Positive margin rate varied greatly among pathological stage (positive margin rates: pT2 = 20.5%; pT3 = 63.0%). A trend towards reduction of positive surgical margins in pT2 cases was apparent with increasing experience. Intraoperative and early complications occurred in 2.0% of patients. In all patients, 85.9% used none or no more than one pad per 24 h at 6 months postoperatively. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence was seen in only 2 patients. Conclusions. In the present series of 100 patients, our retrospective evaluation confirms that LRP provides satisfactory results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3200285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32002852011-11-22 Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases Imamoto, Takashi Goto, Yusuke Utsumi, Takanobu Fuse, Miki Kawamura, Koji Kamiya, Naoto Naya, Yukio Suzuki, Hiroyoshi Kondo, Yukihiro Ichikawa, Tomohiko Prostate Cancer Clinical Study Objective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate initial learning curves of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with regard to complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. All 100 patients underwent LRP performed by the same urologist at one institution. Results: Mean operating time (208.4 ± 48.6 min), estimated blood loss (495.8 ± 436.5 mL), allogeneic blood transfusion rate (0%), and intraoperative complications diminished with surgical experience. Positive margin rate varied greatly among pathological stage (positive margin rates: pT2 = 20.5%; pT3 = 63.0%). A trend towards reduction of positive surgical margins in pT2 cases was apparent with increasing experience. Intraoperative and early complications occurred in 2.0% of patients. In all patients, 85.9% used none or no more than one pad per 24 h at 6 months postoperatively. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence was seen in only 2 patients. Conclusions. In the present series of 100 patients, our retrospective evaluation confirms that LRP provides satisfactory results. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3200285/ /pubmed/22110991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/606505 Text en Copyright © 2011 Takashi Imamoto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Imamoto, Takashi
Goto, Yusuke
Utsumi, Takanobu
Fuse, Miki
Kawamura, Koji
Kamiya, Naoto
Naya, Yukio
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
Kondo, Yukihiro
Ichikawa, Tomohiko
Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title_full Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title_fullStr Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title_short Complications, Urinary Continence, and Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience for the First 100 Cases
title_sort complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience for the first 100 cases
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3200285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/606505
work_keys_str_mv AT imamototakashi complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT gotoyusuke complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT utsumitakanobu complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT fusemiki complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT kawamurakoji complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT kamiyanaoto complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT nayayukio complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT suzukihiroyoshi complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT kondoyukihiro complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases
AT ichikawatomohiko complicationsurinarycontinenceandoncologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomysinglesurgeonexperienceforthefirst100cases