Cargando…

Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Following initial standard chemotherapy (platinum/taxol), more than 75% of those patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) experience a recurrence. There are currently no accurate prognostic tests that, at the time of the diagnosis/surgery, can identify those patients with advance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikas, Jason B., Boylan, Kristin L.M., Skubitz, Amy P.N., Low, Walter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S8104
_version_ 1782214818963390464
author Nikas, Jason B.
Boylan, Kristin L.M.
Skubitz, Amy P.N.
Low, Walter C.
author_facet Nikas, Jason B.
Boylan, Kristin L.M.
Skubitz, Amy P.N.
Low, Walter C.
author_sort Nikas, Jason B.
collection PubMed
description Following initial standard chemotherapy (platinum/taxol), more than 75% of those patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) experience a recurrence. There are currently no accurate prognostic tests that, at the time of the diagnosis/surgery, can identify those patients with advanced stage EOC who will respond to chemotherapy. Using a novel mathematical theory, we have developed three prognostic biomarker models (complex mathematical functions) that—based on a global gene expression analysis of tumor tissue collected during surgery and prior to the commencement of chemotherapy—can identify with a high accuracy those patients with advanced stage EOC who will respond to the standard chemotherapy [long-term survivors (>7 yrs)] and those who will not do so [short-term survivors (<3 yrs)]. Our three prognostic biomarker models were developed with 34 subjects and validated with 20 unknown (new and different) subjects. Both the overall biomarker model sensitivity and specificity ranged from 95.83% to 100.00%. The 12 most significant genes identified, which are also the input variables to the three mathematical functions, constitute three distinct gene networks with the following functions: 1) production of cytoskeletal components, 2) cell proliferation, and 3) cell energy production. The first gene network is directly associated with the mechanism of action of anti-tubulin chemotherapeutic agents, such as taxanes and epothilones. This could have a significant impact in the discovery of new, more effective pharmacological treatments that may significantly extend the survival of patients with advanced stage EOC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3201114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32011142011-11-14 Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Nikas, Jason B. Boylan, Kristin L.M. Skubitz, Amy P.N. Low, Walter C. Cancer Inform Original Research Following initial standard chemotherapy (platinum/taxol), more than 75% of those patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) experience a recurrence. There are currently no accurate prognostic tests that, at the time of the diagnosis/surgery, can identify those patients with advanced stage EOC who will respond to chemotherapy. Using a novel mathematical theory, we have developed three prognostic biomarker models (complex mathematical functions) that—based on a global gene expression analysis of tumor tissue collected during surgery and prior to the commencement of chemotherapy—can identify with a high accuracy those patients with advanced stage EOC who will respond to the standard chemotherapy [long-term survivors (>7 yrs)] and those who will not do so [short-term survivors (<3 yrs)]. Our three prognostic biomarker models were developed with 34 subjects and validated with 20 unknown (new and different) subjects. Both the overall biomarker model sensitivity and specificity ranged from 95.83% to 100.00%. The 12 most significant genes identified, which are also the input variables to the three mathematical functions, constitute three distinct gene networks with the following functions: 1) production of cytoskeletal components, 2) cell proliferation, and 3) cell energy production. The first gene network is directly associated with the mechanism of action of anti-tubulin chemotherapeutic agents, such as taxanes and epothilones. This could have a significant impact in the discovery of new, more effective pharmacological treatments that may significantly extend the survival of patients with advanced stage EOC. Libertas Academica 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3201114/ /pubmed/22084564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S8104 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nikas, Jason B.
Boylan, Kristin L.M.
Skubitz, Amy P.N.
Low, Walter C.
Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_short Mathematical Prognostic Biomarker Models for Treatment Response and Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_sort mathematical prognostic biomarker models for treatment response and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22084564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S8104
work_keys_str_mv AT nikasjasonb mathematicalprognosticbiomarkermodelsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinepithelialovariancancer
AT boylankristinlm mathematicalprognosticbiomarkermodelsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinepithelialovariancancer
AT skubitzamypn mathematicalprognosticbiomarkermodelsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinepithelialovariancancer
AT lowwalterc mathematicalprognosticbiomarkermodelsfortreatmentresponseandsurvivalinepithelialovariancancer