Cargando…
Tri-μ-chlorido-bis[(η(6)-hexamethylbenzene)ruthenium(II)] tetrachloridoferrate(III)
The molecular geometry of the complex cation in the title structure, [(μ-Cl)(3){Ru(II)(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))}(2)][Fe(III)Cl(4)], compares very well with that reported earlier for the corresponding PF(6) (−) salt [Pandey et al. (1999 ▶). J. Organomet. Chem. 592, 278–282]. The [FeCl(4)](−) counter ion has...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22058693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S160053681103621X |
Sumario: | The molecular geometry of the complex cation in the title structure, [(μ-Cl)(3){Ru(II)(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))}(2)][Fe(III)Cl(4)], compares very well with that reported earlier for the corresponding PF(6) (−) salt [Pandey et al. (1999 ▶). J. Organomet. Chem. 592, 278–282]. The [FeCl(4)](−) counter ion has a rather regular tetrahedral geometry with Fe—Cl distances and Cl—Fe—Cl angles in the range 2.1891 (7)–2.2018 (8) Å and 107.10 (3)–110.56 (3)°, respectively. There are no significant intermolecular interactions in the crystal except for some weak C—H⋯Cl contacts, which in turn indicates that the crystal packing is determined predominantly by electrostatic interactions between the ionic constituents. |
---|