Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the minimally invasive Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc., San Clemente, CA) in patients with moderate LSS. METHODS: This single-arm prospective study enrolled 121 patients with moderate LSS between February 2008 and August 2009 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bini, Walter, Miller, Larry E, Block, Jon E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043255
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001105010361
_version_ 1782214903792140288
author Bini, Walter
Miller, Larry E
Block, Jon E
author_facet Bini, Walter
Miller, Larry E
Block, Jon E
author_sort Bini, Walter
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the minimally invasive Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc., San Clemente, CA) in patients with moderate LSS. METHODS: This single-arm prospective study enrolled 121 patients with moderate LSS between February 2008 and August 2009 and were followed up at 1 (n=111), 3 (n=96), 6 (n=81), and 12 (n=52) months. All patients were treated with the Superion Interspinous Spacer. Main outcomes were back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), extremity and axial pain severity with an 11-point scale, health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36, and adverse events through 12 months. RESULTS: ODI improved 64% (p<0.001) through 12 months and clinical success was 92%. Extremity and axial pain improved 53% and 49% (both p<0.001), respectively, through 12 months with clinical success of 76% for axial pain and 86% for extremity pain. Health-related quality of life improved 41% for PCS and 22% for MCS (both p<0.001) through 12 months. PCS clinical success was 81% and MCS clinical success was 62% at 12 months. Four (5.9%) explants were performed although 3 were unrelated to the device. Eight procedure-related adverse events, observed in 6 (5.0%) patients, included superficial incision seroma (n=5), minor wound pain (n=2), and infection (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results with the Superion Interspinous Spacer suggest that it is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with moderate LSS who are unresponsive to conservative care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3201565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32015652011-10-31 Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer Bini, Walter Miller, Larry E Block, Jon E Open Orthop J Article PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the minimally invasive Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc., San Clemente, CA) in patients with moderate LSS. METHODS: This single-arm prospective study enrolled 121 patients with moderate LSS between February 2008 and August 2009 and were followed up at 1 (n=111), 3 (n=96), 6 (n=81), and 12 (n=52) months. All patients were treated with the Superion Interspinous Spacer. Main outcomes were back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), extremity and axial pain severity with an 11-point scale, health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36, and adverse events through 12 months. RESULTS: ODI improved 64% (p<0.001) through 12 months and clinical success was 92%. Extremity and axial pain improved 53% and 49% (both p<0.001), respectively, through 12 months with clinical success of 76% for axial pain and 86% for extremity pain. Health-related quality of life improved 41% for PCS and 22% for MCS (both p<0.001) through 12 months. PCS clinical success was 81% and MCS clinical success was 62% at 12 months. Four (5.9%) explants were performed although 3 were unrelated to the device. Eight procedure-related adverse events, observed in 6 (5.0%) patients, included superficial incision seroma (n=5), minor wound pain (n=2), and infection (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results with the Superion Interspinous Spacer suggest that it is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with moderate LSS who are unresponsive to conservative care. Bentham Open 2011-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3201565/ /pubmed/22043255 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001105010361 Text en © Bini et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Bini, Walter
Miller, Larry E
Block, Jon E
Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title_full Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title_short Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion(®) Interspinous Spacer
title_sort minimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the superion(®) interspinous spacer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043255
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001105010361
work_keys_str_mv AT biniwalter minimallyinvasivetreatmentofmoderatelumbarspinalstenosiswiththesuperioninterspinousspacer
AT millerlarrye minimallyinvasivetreatmentofmoderatelumbarspinalstenosiswiththesuperioninterspinousspacer
AT blockjone minimallyinvasivetreatmentofmoderatelumbarspinalstenosiswiththesuperioninterspinousspacer