Cargando…

Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography

The increased thickness of the carotid wall >1 mm is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of our study was to assess the agreement between multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and color...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savić, Živorad N., Soldatović, Ivan I., Brajović, Milan D., Pavlović, Aleksandra M., Mladenović, Dušan R., Škodrić-Trifunović, Vesna D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.147
_version_ 1782214916531290112
author Savić, Živorad N.
Soldatović, Ivan I.
Brajović, Milan D.
Pavlović, Aleksandra M.
Mladenović, Dušan R.
Škodrić-Trifunović, Vesna D.
author_facet Savić, Živorad N.
Soldatović, Ivan I.
Brajović, Milan D.
Pavlović, Aleksandra M.
Mladenović, Dušan R.
Škodrić-Trifunović, Vesna D.
author_sort Savić, Živorad N.
collection PubMed
description The increased thickness of the carotid wall >1 mm is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of our study was to assess the agreement between multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring intimae-media thickness (IMT). Eighty-nine patients (aged 35–81) were prospectively analyzed using a 64-detector MDCTA and a CD-US scanner. Continuous data were described as the mean value ± standard deviation, and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Bland–Altman statistics were employed to measure the agreement between MDCTA and CD-US. CAWT ranged from 0.62 to 1.60 mm, with a mean value of 1.09 mm. IMT ranged from 0.60 to 1.55 mm, with a mean value of 1.06 mm. We observed an excellent agreement between CD-US and MDCTA in the evaluation of the common carotid artery thickness, with a bias between methods of 0.029 mm (which is a highly statistically important difference of absolute values [t = 43.289; p < 0.01] obtained by paired T test), and limits of agreement from 0.04 to 0.104. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9996–0.9998; p < 0.01). We conclude that there is an excellent correlation between CAWT and IMT measurements obtained with the MDCTA and CD-US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3201632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32016322012-01-05 Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography Savić, Živorad N. Soldatović, Ivan I. Brajović, Milan D. Pavlović, Aleksandra M. Mladenović, Dušan R. Škodrić-Trifunović, Vesna D. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The increased thickness of the carotid wall >1 mm is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of our study was to assess the agreement between multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring intimae-media thickness (IMT). Eighty-nine patients (aged 35–81) were prospectively analyzed using a 64-detector MDCTA and a CD-US scanner. Continuous data were described as the mean value ± standard deviation, and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Bland–Altman statistics were employed to measure the agreement between MDCTA and CD-US. CAWT ranged from 0.62 to 1.60 mm, with a mean value of 1.09 mm. IMT ranged from 0.60 to 1.55 mm, with a mean value of 1.06 mm. We observed an excellent agreement between CD-US and MDCTA in the evaluation of the common carotid artery thickness, with a bias between methods of 0.029 mm (which is a highly statistically important difference of absolute values [t = 43.289; p < 0.01] obtained by paired T test), and limits of agreement from 0.04 to 0.104. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9996–0.9998; p < 0.01). We conclude that there is an excellent correlation between CAWT and IMT measurements obtained with the MDCTA and CD-US. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2011-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3201632/ /pubmed/22224072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.147 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Savić, Živorad N.
Soldatović, Ivan I.
Brajović, Milan D.
Pavlović, Aleksandra M.
Mladenović, Dušan R.
Škodrić-Trifunović, Vesna D.
Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title_full Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title_fullStr Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title_short Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography
title_sort comparison between carotid artery wall thickness measured by multidetector row computed tomography angiography and intimae-media thickness measured by sonography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2011.147
work_keys_str_mv AT saviczivoradn comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography
AT soldatovicivani comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography
AT brajovicmiland comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography
AT pavlovicaleksandram comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography
AT mladenovicdusanr comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography
AT skodrictrifunovicvesnad comparisonbetweencarotidarterywallthicknessmeasuredbymultidetectorrowcomputedtomographyangiographyandintimaemediathicknessmeasuredbysonography