Cargando…
The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives
In silico models have prompted considerable interest and debate because of their potential value in predicting the properties of chemical substances for regulatory purposes. The European REACH legislation promotes innovation and encourages the use of alternative methods, but in practice the use of i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-5-58 |
_version_ | 1782214935447601152 |
---|---|
author | Benfenati, Emilio Diaza, Rodolfo Gonella Cassano, Antonio Pardoe, Simon Gini, Giuseppina Mays, Claire Knauf, Ralf Benighaus, Ludger |
author_facet | Benfenati, Emilio Diaza, Rodolfo Gonella Cassano, Antonio Pardoe, Simon Gini, Giuseppina Mays, Claire Knauf, Ralf Benighaus, Ludger |
author_sort | Benfenati, Emilio |
collection | PubMed |
description | In silico models have prompted considerable interest and debate because of their potential value in predicting the properties of chemical substances for regulatory purposes. The European REACH legislation promotes innovation and encourages the use of alternative methods, but in practice the use of in silico models is still very limited. There are many stakeholders influencing the regulatory trajectory of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models, including regulators, industry, model developers and consultants. Here we outline some of the issues and challenges involved in the acceptance of these methods for regulatory purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3201894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32018942011-10-26 The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives Benfenati, Emilio Diaza, Rodolfo Gonella Cassano, Antonio Pardoe, Simon Gini, Giuseppina Mays, Claire Knauf, Ralf Benighaus, Ludger Chem Cent J Commentary In silico models have prompted considerable interest and debate because of their potential value in predicting the properties of chemical substances for regulatory purposes. The European REACH legislation promotes innovation and encourages the use of alternative methods, but in practice the use of in silico models is still very limited. There are many stakeholders influencing the regulatory trajectory of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models, including regulators, industry, model developers and consultants. Here we outline some of the issues and challenges involved in the acceptance of these methods for regulatory purposes. BioMed Central 2011-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3201894/ /pubmed/21982269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-5-58 Text en Copyright ©2011 Benfenati et al |
spellingShingle | Commentary Benfenati, Emilio Diaza, Rodolfo Gonella Cassano, Antonio Pardoe, Simon Gini, Giuseppina Mays, Claire Knauf, Ralf Benighaus, Ludger The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title | The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title_full | The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title_fullStr | The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title_short | The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
title_sort | acceptance of in silico models for reach: requirements, barriers, and perspectives |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21982269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-5-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benfenatiemilio theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT diazarodolfogonella theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT cassanoantonio theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT pardoesimon theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT ginigiuseppina theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT maysclaire theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT knaufralf theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT benighausludger theacceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT benfenatiemilio acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT diazarodolfogonella acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT cassanoantonio acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT pardoesimon acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT ginigiuseppina acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT maysclaire acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT knaufralf acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives AT benighausludger acceptanceofinsilicomodelsforreachrequirementsbarriersandperspectives |