Cargando…
Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin Americ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111 |
_version_ | 1782214951878787072 |
---|---|
author | Chi, Benjamin H. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Westfall, Andrew O. Newman, Jamie E. Zhou, Jialun Cesar, Carina Brinkhof, Martin W. G. Mwango, Albert Balestre, Eric Carriquiry, Gabriela Sirisanthana, Thira Mukumbi, Henri Martin, Jeffrey N. Grimsrud, Anna Bacon, Melanie Thiebaut, Rodolphe |
author_facet | Chi, Benjamin H. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Westfall, Andrew O. Newman, Jamie E. Zhou, Jialun Cesar, Carina Brinkhof, Martin W. G. Mwango, Albert Balestre, Eric Carriquiry, Gabriela Sirisanthana, Thira Mukumbi, Henri Martin, Jeffrey N. Grimsrud, Anna Bacon, Melanie Thiebaut, Rodolphe |
author_sort | Chi, Benjamin H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition. METHODS AND FINDINGS: At a set “status classification” date, patients were categorized as either “active” or “LTFU” according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities—representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries—were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173–181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%–7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean = 150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean = 1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%–1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean = 19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%–21.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3201937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32019372011-10-28 Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America Chi, Benjamin H. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Westfall, Andrew O. Newman, Jamie E. Zhou, Jialun Cesar, Carina Brinkhof, Martin W. G. Mwango, Albert Balestre, Eric Carriquiry, Gabriela Sirisanthana, Thira Mukumbi, Henri Martin, Jeffrey N. Grimsrud, Anna Bacon, Melanie Thiebaut, Rodolphe PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition. METHODS AND FINDINGS: At a set “status classification” date, patients were categorized as either “active” or “LTFU” according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities—representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries—were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173–181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%–7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean = 150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean = 1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%–1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean = 19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%–21.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3201937/ /pubmed/22039357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chi, Benjamin H. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Westfall, Andrew O. Newman, Jamie E. Zhou, Jialun Cesar, Carina Brinkhof, Martin W. G. Mwango, Albert Balestre, Eric Carriquiry, Gabriela Sirisanthana, Thira Mukumbi, Henri Martin, Jeffrey N. Grimsrud, Anna Bacon, Melanie Thiebaut, Rodolphe Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title | Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title_full | Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title_fullStr | Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed | Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title_short | Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America |
title_sort | universal definition of loss to follow-up in hiv treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in africa, asia, and latin america |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chibenjaminh universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT yiannoutsosconstantint universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT westfallandrewo universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT newmanjamiee universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT zhoujialun universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT cesarcarina universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT brinkhofmartinwg universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT mwangoalbert universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT balestreeric universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT carriquirygabriela universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT sirisanthanathira universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT mukumbihenri universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT martinjeffreyn universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT grimsrudanna universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT baconmelanie universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT thiebautrodolphe universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica AT universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica |