Cargando…

Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America

BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin Americ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chi, Benjamin H., Yiannoutsos, Constantin T., Westfall, Andrew O., Newman, Jamie E., Zhou, Jialun, Cesar, Carina, Brinkhof, Martin W. G., Mwango, Albert, Balestre, Eric, Carriquiry, Gabriela, Sirisanthana, Thira, Mukumbi, Henri, Martin, Jeffrey N., Grimsrud, Anna, Bacon, Melanie, Thiebaut, Rodolphe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111
_version_ 1782214951878787072
author Chi, Benjamin H.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Westfall, Andrew O.
Newman, Jamie E.
Zhou, Jialun
Cesar, Carina
Brinkhof, Martin W. G.
Mwango, Albert
Balestre, Eric
Carriquiry, Gabriela
Sirisanthana, Thira
Mukumbi, Henri
Martin, Jeffrey N.
Grimsrud, Anna
Bacon, Melanie
Thiebaut, Rodolphe
author_facet Chi, Benjamin H.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Westfall, Andrew O.
Newman, Jamie E.
Zhou, Jialun
Cesar, Carina
Brinkhof, Martin W. G.
Mwango, Albert
Balestre, Eric
Carriquiry, Gabriela
Sirisanthana, Thira
Mukumbi, Henri
Martin, Jeffrey N.
Grimsrud, Anna
Bacon, Melanie
Thiebaut, Rodolphe
author_sort Chi, Benjamin H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition. METHODS AND FINDINGS: At a set “status classification” date, patients were categorized as either “active” or “LTFU” according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities—representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries—were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173–181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%–7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean = 150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean = 1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%–1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean = 19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%–21.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3201937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32019372011-10-28 Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America Chi, Benjamin H. Yiannoutsos, Constantin T. Westfall, Andrew O. Newman, Jamie E. Zhou, Jialun Cesar, Carina Brinkhof, Martin W. G. Mwango, Albert Balestre, Eric Carriquiry, Gabriela Sirisanthana, Thira Mukumbi, Henri Martin, Jeffrey N. Grimsrud, Anna Bacon, Melanie Thiebaut, Rodolphe PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Although patient attrition is recognized as a threat to the long-term success of antiretroviral therapy programs worldwide, there is no universal definition for classifying patients as lost to follow-up (LTFU). We analyzed data from health facilities across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to empirically determine a standard LTFU definition. METHODS AND FINDINGS: At a set “status classification” date, patients were categorized as either “active” or “LTFU” according to different intervals from time of last clinic encounter. For each threshold, we looked forward 365 d to assess the performance and accuracy of this initial classification. The best-performing definition for LTFU had the lowest proportion of patients misclassified as active or LTFU. Observational data from 111 health facilities—representing 180,718 patients from 19 countries—were included in this study. In the primary analysis, for which data from all facilities were pooled, an interval of 180 d (95% confidence interval [CI]: 173–181 d) since last patient encounter resulted in the fewest misclassifications (7.7%, 95% CI: 7.6%–7.8%). A secondary analysis that gave equal weight to cohorts and to regions generated a similar result (175 d); however, an alternate approach that used inverse weighting for cohorts based on variance and equal weighting for regions produced a slightly lower summary measure (150 d). When examined at the facility level, the best-performing definition varied from 58 to 383 d (mean = 150 d), but when a standard definition of 180 d was applied to each facility, only slight increases in misclassification (mean = 1.2%, 95% CI: 1.0%–1.5%) were observed. Using this definition, the proportion of patients classified as LTFU by facility ranged from 3.1% to 45.1% (mean = 19.9%, 95% CI: 19.1%–21.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this evaluation, we recommend the adoption of ≥180 d since the last clinic visit as a standard LTFU definition. Such standardization is an important step to understanding the reasons that underlie patient attrition and establishing more reliable and comparable program evaluation worldwide. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3201937/ /pubmed/22039357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chi, Benjamin H.
Yiannoutsos, Constantin T.
Westfall, Andrew O.
Newman, Jamie E.
Zhou, Jialun
Cesar, Carina
Brinkhof, Martin W. G.
Mwango, Albert
Balestre, Eric
Carriquiry, Gabriela
Sirisanthana, Thira
Mukumbi, Henri
Martin, Jeffrey N.
Grimsrud, Anna
Bacon, Melanie
Thiebaut, Rodolphe
Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title_full Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title_fullStr Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title_full_unstemmed Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title_short Universal Definition of Loss to Follow-Up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Statistical Analysis of 111 Facilities in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
title_sort universal definition of loss to follow-up in hiv treatment programs: a statistical analysis of 111 facilities in africa, asia, and latin america
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001111
work_keys_str_mv AT chibenjaminh universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT yiannoutsosconstantint universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT westfallandrewo universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT newmanjamiee universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT zhoujialun universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT cesarcarina universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT brinkhofmartinwg universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT mwangoalbert universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT balestreeric universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT carriquirygabriela universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT sirisanthanathira universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT mukumbihenri universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT martinjeffreyn universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT grimsrudanna universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT baconmelanie universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT thiebautrodolphe universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica
AT universaldefinitionoflosstofollowupinhivtreatmentprogramsastatisticalanalysisof111facilitiesinafricaasiaandlatinamerica