Cargando…

Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey

Objectives To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996. Design Cross sectional survey using a web based questionnaire. Setting International survey of jou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wislar, Joseph S, Flanagin, Annette, Fontanarosa, Phil B, DeAngelis, Catherine D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
_version_ 1782214962713722880
author Wislar, Joseph S
Flanagin, Annette
Fontanarosa, Phil B
DeAngelis, Catherine D
author_facet Wislar, Joseph S
Flanagin, Annette
Fontanarosa, Phil B
DeAngelis, Catherine D
author_sort Wislar, Joseph S
collection PubMed
description Objectives To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996. Design Cross sectional survey using a web based questionnaire. Setting International survey of journal authors. Participants Sample of corresponding authors of 896 research articles, review articles, and editorial/opinion articles published in six general medical journals with high impact factors in 2008: Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, Nature Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, and PLoS Medicine. Main outcome measures Self reported compliance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for all authors on the selected articles. Results A total of 630/896 (70.3%) corresponding authors responded to the survey. The prevalence of articles with honorary authorship or ghost authorship, or both, was 21.0% (95% CI 18.0% to 24.3%), a decrease from 29.2% reported in 1996 (P=0.004). Based on 545 responses on honorary authorship, 96 articles (17.6% (95% CI 14.6% to 21.0%)) had honorary authors (range by journal 12.2% to 29.3%), a non-significant change from 1996 (19.3%; P=0.439). Based on 622 responses on ghost authorship, 49 articles (7.9% (6.0% to 10.3%)) had ghost authors (range by journal 2.1% to 11.0%), a significant decline from 1996 (11.5%; P=0.023). The prevalence of honorary authorship was 25.0% in original research reports, 15.0% in reviews, and 11.2% in editorials, whereas the prevalence of ghost authorship was 11.9% in research articles, 6.0% in reviews, and 5.3% in editorials. Conclusions Evidence of honorary and ghost authorship in 21% of articles published in major medical journals in 2008 suggests that increased efforts by scientific journals, individual authors, and academic institutions are essential to promote responsibility, accountability, and transparency in authorship, and to maintain integrity in scientific publication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3202014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32020142011-11-01 Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey Wislar, Joseph S Flanagin, Annette Fontanarosa, Phil B DeAngelis, Catherine D BMJ Research Objectives To assess the prevalence of honorary and ghost authors in six leading general medical journals in 2008 and compare this with the prevalence reported by authors of articles published in 1996. Design Cross sectional survey using a web based questionnaire. Setting International survey of journal authors. Participants Sample of corresponding authors of 896 research articles, review articles, and editorial/opinion articles published in six general medical journals with high impact factors in 2008: Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, Nature Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, and PLoS Medicine. Main outcome measures Self reported compliance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for all authors on the selected articles. Results A total of 630/896 (70.3%) corresponding authors responded to the survey. The prevalence of articles with honorary authorship or ghost authorship, or both, was 21.0% (95% CI 18.0% to 24.3%), a decrease from 29.2% reported in 1996 (P=0.004). Based on 545 responses on honorary authorship, 96 articles (17.6% (95% CI 14.6% to 21.0%)) had honorary authors (range by journal 12.2% to 29.3%), a non-significant change from 1996 (19.3%; P=0.439). Based on 622 responses on ghost authorship, 49 articles (7.9% (6.0% to 10.3%)) had ghost authors (range by journal 2.1% to 11.0%), a significant decline from 1996 (11.5%; P=0.023). The prevalence of honorary authorship was 25.0% in original research reports, 15.0% in reviews, and 11.2% in editorials, whereas the prevalence of ghost authorship was 11.9% in research articles, 6.0% in reviews, and 5.3% in editorials. Conclusions Evidence of honorary and ghost authorship in 21% of articles published in major medical journals in 2008 suggests that increased efforts by scientific journals, individual authors, and academic institutions are essential to promote responsibility, accountability, and transparency in authorship, and to maintain integrity in scientific publication. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3202014/ /pubmed/22028479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128 Text en © Wislar et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Wislar, Joseph S
Flanagin, Annette
Fontanarosa, Phil B
DeAngelis, Catherine D
Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title_full Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title_fullStr Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title_short Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
title_sort honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
work_keys_str_mv AT wislarjosephs honoraryandghostauthorshipinhighimpactbiomedicaljournalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT flanaginannette honoraryandghostauthorshipinhighimpactbiomedicaljournalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT fontanarosaphilb honoraryandghostauthorshipinhighimpactbiomedicaljournalsacrosssectionalsurvey
AT deangeliscatherined honoraryandghostauthorshipinhighimpactbiomedicaljournalsacrosssectionalsurvey