Cargando…

Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is supposed to be classified on the basis of post-bronchodilator lung function. Most longitudinal studies of COPD, though, do not have post-bronchodilator lung function available. We used pre-and post bronchodilator lung function data from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mannino, David M, Diaz-Guzman, Enrique, Buist, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-136
_version_ 1782214988548538368
author Mannino, David M
Diaz-Guzman, Enrique
Buist, Sonia
author_facet Mannino, David M
Diaz-Guzman, Enrique
Buist, Sonia
author_sort Mannino, David M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is supposed to be classified on the basis of post-bronchodilator lung function. Most longitudinal studies of COPD, though, do not have post-bronchodilator lung function available. We used pre-and post bronchodilator lung function data from the Lung Health Study to determine whether these measures differ in their ability to predict mortality. METHODS: We limited our analysis to subjects who were of black or white race, on whom we had complete data, and who participated at either the 1 year or the 5 year follow-up visit. We classified subjects based on their baseline lung function, according to COPD Classification criteria using both pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function. We conducted a survival analysis and logistic regression predicting death and controlling for age, sex, race, treatment group, smoking status, and measures of lung function (either pre- or post-bronchodilator. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and also calculated area under the curve for the logistic regression models. RESULTS: By year 15 of the study, 721 of the original 5,887 study subjects had died. In the year 1 sample survival models, a higher FEV(1 )% predicted lower mortality in both the pre-bronchodilator (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81, 0.94 per 10% increase) and post-bronchodilator (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77, 0.90) models. The area under the curve for the respective models was 69.2% and 69.4%. Similarly, using categories, when compared to people with "normal" lung function, subjects with Stage 3 or 4 disease had similar mortality in both the pre- (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.75, 3.03) and post-bronchodilator (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.41, 5.15) models. In the year 5 sample, when a larger proportion of subjects had Stage 3 or 4 disease (6.4% in the pre-bronchodilator group), mortality was significantly increased in both the pre- (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.51, 4.75) and post-bronchodilator (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.63, 3.73) models. CONCLUSIONS: Both pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function predicted mortality in this analysis with a similar degree of accuracy. Post-bronchodilator lung function may not be needed in population studies that predict long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3202237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32022372011-10-27 Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study Mannino, David M Diaz-Guzman, Enrique Buist, Sonia Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is supposed to be classified on the basis of post-bronchodilator lung function. Most longitudinal studies of COPD, though, do not have post-bronchodilator lung function available. We used pre-and post bronchodilator lung function data from the Lung Health Study to determine whether these measures differ in their ability to predict mortality. METHODS: We limited our analysis to subjects who were of black or white race, on whom we had complete data, and who participated at either the 1 year or the 5 year follow-up visit. We classified subjects based on their baseline lung function, according to COPD Classification criteria using both pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function. We conducted a survival analysis and logistic regression predicting death and controlling for age, sex, race, treatment group, smoking status, and measures of lung function (either pre- or post-bronchodilator. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and also calculated area under the curve for the logistic regression models. RESULTS: By year 15 of the study, 721 of the original 5,887 study subjects had died. In the year 1 sample survival models, a higher FEV(1 )% predicted lower mortality in both the pre-bronchodilator (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81, 0.94 per 10% increase) and post-bronchodilator (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77, 0.90) models. The area under the curve for the respective models was 69.2% and 69.4%. Similarly, using categories, when compared to people with "normal" lung function, subjects with Stage 3 or 4 disease had similar mortality in both the pre- (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.75, 3.03) and post-bronchodilator (HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.41, 5.15) models. In the year 5 sample, when a larger proportion of subjects had Stage 3 or 4 disease (6.4% in the pre-bronchodilator group), mortality was significantly increased in both the pre- (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.51, 4.75) and post-bronchodilator (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.63, 3.73) models. CONCLUSIONS: Both pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function predicted mortality in this analysis with a similar degree of accuracy. Post-bronchodilator lung function may not be needed in population studies that predict long-term outcomes. BioMed Central 2011 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3202237/ /pubmed/21991942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-136 Text en Copyright ©2011 Mannino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mannino, David M
Diaz-Guzman, Enrique
Buist, Sonia
Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title_full Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title_fullStr Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title_full_unstemmed Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title_short Pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the Lung Health Study
title_sort pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality in the lung health study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-12-136
work_keys_str_mv AT manninodavidm preandpostbronchodilatorlungfunctionaspredictorsofmortalityinthelunghealthstudy
AT diazguzmanenrique preandpostbronchodilatorlungfunctionaspredictorsofmortalityinthelunghealthstudy
AT buistsonia preandpostbronchodilatorlungfunctionaspredictorsofmortalityinthelunghealthstudy