Cargando…
The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results
OBJECTIVE(S): To determine if mishandling prior to testing would make a sample from a chronically infected subject appear recently infected when tested by cross-sectional HIV incidence assays. METHODS: Serum samples from 31 subjects with chronic HIV infection were tested. Samples were subjected to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025899 |
_version_ | 1782215003344994304 |
---|---|
author | Laeyendecker, Oliver Latimore, Amanda Eshleman, Susan H. Summerton, Jean Oliver, Amy E. Gamiel, Jordyn Dobbs, Trudy Mei, Joanne Murphy, Gary Parry, John V. Owen, S. Michele Quinn, Thomas C. |
author_facet | Laeyendecker, Oliver Latimore, Amanda Eshleman, Susan H. Summerton, Jean Oliver, Amy E. Gamiel, Jordyn Dobbs, Trudy Mei, Joanne Murphy, Gary Parry, John V. Owen, S. Michele Quinn, Thomas C. |
author_sort | Laeyendecker, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE(S): To determine if mishandling prior to testing would make a sample from a chronically infected subject appear recently infected when tested by cross-sectional HIV incidence assays. METHODS: Serum samples from 31 subjects with chronic HIV infection were tested. Samples were subjected to different handling conditions, including incubation at 4°C, 25°C and 37°C, for 1, 3, 7 or 15 days prior to testing. Samples were also subjected to 1,3, 7 and 15 freeze-thaw cycles prior to testing. Samples were tested using the BED capture enzyme immuno assay (BED-CEIA), Vironostika-less sensitive (V-LS), and an avidity assay using the Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 plus O EIA (avidity assay). RESULTS: Compared to the sample that was not subjected to any mishandling conditions, for the BED-CEIA, V-LS and avidity assay, there was no significant change in test results for samples incubated at 4°C or 25°C prior to testing. No impact on test results occurred after 15 freeze-thaw cycles. A decrease in assay results was observed when samples were held for 3 days or longer at 37°C prior to testing. CONCLUSIONS: Samples can be subjected up to 15 freeze-thaw cycles without affecting the results the BED-CEIA, Vironostika-LS, or avidity assays. Storing samples at 4°C or 25°C for up to fifteen days prior to testing had no impact on test results. However, storing samples at 37°C for three or more days did affect results obtained with these assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3202521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32025212011-11-01 The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results Laeyendecker, Oliver Latimore, Amanda Eshleman, Susan H. Summerton, Jean Oliver, Amy E. Gamiel, Jordyn Dobbs, Trudy Mei, Joanne Murphy, Gary Parry, John V. Owen, S. Michele Quinn, Thomas C. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE(S): To determine if mishandling prior to testing would make a sample from a chronically infected subject appear recently infected when tested by cross-sectional HIV incidence assays. METHODS: Serum samples from 31 subjects with chronic HIV infection were tested. Samples were subjected to different handling conditions, including incubation at 4°C, 25°C and 37°C, for 1, 3, 7 or 15 days prior to testing. Samples were also subjected to 1,3, 7 and 15 freeze-thaw cycles prior to testing. Samples were tested using the BED capture enzyme immuno assay (BED-CEIA), Vironostika-less sensitive (V-LS), and an avidity assay using the Genetic Systems HIV-1/HIV-2 plus O EIA (avidity assay). RESULTS: Compared to the sample that was not subjected to any mishandling conditions, for the BED-CEIA, V-LS and avidity assay, there was no significant change in test results for samples incubated at 4°C or 25°C prior to testing. No impact on test results occurred after 15 freeze-thaw cycles. A decrease in assay results was observed when samples were held for 3 days or longer at 37°C prior to testing. CONCLUSIONS: Samples can be subjected up to 15 freeze-thaw cycles without affecting the results the BED-CEIA, Vironostika-LS, or avidity assays. Storing samples at 4°C or 25°C for up to fifteen days prior to testing had no impact on test results. However, storing samples at 37°C for three or more days did affect results obtained with these assays. Public Library of Science 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3202521/ /pubmed/22046249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025899 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Laeyendecker, Oliver Latimore, Amanda Eshleman, Susan H. Summerton, Jean Oliver, Amy E. Gamiel, Jordyn Dobbs, Trudy Mei, Joanne Murphy, Gary Parry, John V. Owen, S. Michele Quinn, Thomas C. The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title | The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title_full | The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title_short | The Effect of Sample Handling on Cross Sectional HIV Incidence Testing Results |
title_sort | effect of sample handling on cross sectional hiv incidence testing results |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laeyendeckeroliver theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT latimoreamanda theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT eshlemansusanh theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT summertonjean theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT oliveramye theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT gamieljordyn theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT dobbstrudy theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT meijoanne theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT murphygary theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT parryjohnv theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT owensmichele theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT quinnthomasc theeffectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT laeyendeckeroliver effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT latimoreamanda effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT eshlemansusanh effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT summertonjean effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT oliveramye effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT gamieljordyn effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT dobbstrudy effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT meijoanne effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT murphygary effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT parryjohnv effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT owensmichele effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults AT quinnthomasc effectofsamplehandlingoncrosssectionalhivincidencetestingresults |