Cargando…
Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contaminatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678 |
_version_ | 1782215043767599104 |
---|---|
author | Cary, Jeffrey W. Rajasekaran, Kanniah Brown, Robert L. Luo, Meng Chen, Zhi-Yuan Bhatnagar, Deepak |
author_facet | Cary, Jeffrey W. Rajasekaran, Kanniah Brown, Robert L. Luo, Meng Chen, Zhi-Yuan Bhatnagar, Deepak |
author_sort | Cary, Jeffrey W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contamination is the development of preharvest host resistance. This is because A. flavus infects and produces aflatoxins in susceptible crops prior to harvest. In maize production, the host resistance strategy has gained prominence because of advances in the identification of natural resistance traits. However, native resistance in maize to aflatoxin contamination is polygenic and complex and, therefore, markers need to be identified to facilitate the transfer of resistance traits into agronomically viable genetic backgrounds while limiting the transfer of undesirable traits. Unlike maize, there are no known cotton varieties that demonstrate enhanced resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. For this reason, transgenic approaches are being undertaken in cotton that utilize genes encoding antifungal/anti-aflatoxin factors from maize and other sources to counter fungal infection and toxin production. This review will present information on preharvest control strategies that utilize both breeding and native resistance identification approaches in maize as well as transgenic approaches in cotton. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3202838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32028382011-11-08 Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed Cary, Jeffrey W. Rajasekaran, Kanniah Brown, Robert L. Luo, Meng Chen, Zhi-Yuan Bhatnagar, Deepak Toxins (Basel) Review At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contamination is the development of preharvest host resistance. This is because A. flavus infects and produces aflatoxins in susceptible crops prior to harvest. In maize production, the host resistance strategy has gained prominence because of advances in the identification of natural resistance traits. However, native resistance in maize to aflatoxin contamination is polygenic and complex and, therefore, markers need to be identified to facilitate the transfer of resistance traits into agronomically viable genetic backgrounds while limiting the transfer of undesirable traits. Unlike maize, there are no known cotton varieties that demonstrate enhanced resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. For this reason, transgenic approaches are being undertaken in cotton that utilize genes encoding antifungal/anti-aflatoxin factors from maize and other sources to counter fungal infection and toxin production. This review will present information on preharvest control strategies that utilize both breeding and native resistance identification approaches in maize as well as transgenic approaches in cotton. MDPI 2011-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3202838/ /pubmed/22069734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cary, Jeffrey W. Rajasekaran, Kanniah Brown, Robert L. Luo, Meng Chen, Zhi-Yuan Bhatnagar, Deepak Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title | Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title_full | Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title_fullStr | Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title_short | Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed |
title_sort | developing resistance to aflatoxin in maize and cottonseed |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caryjeffreyw developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed AT rajasekarankanniah developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed AT brownrobertl developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed AT luomeng developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed AT chenzhiyuan developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed AT bhatnagardeepak developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed |