Cargando…

Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed

At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contaminatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cary, Jeffrey W., Rajasekaran, Kanniah, Brown, Robert L., Luo, Meng, Chen, Zhi-Yuan, Bhatnagar, Deepak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678
_version_ 1782215043767599104
author Cary, Jeffrey W.
Rajasekaran, Kanniah
Brown, Robert L.
Luo, Meng
Chen, Zhi-Yuan
Bhatnagar, Deepak
author_facet Cary, Jeffrey W.
Rajasekaran, Kanniah
Brown, Robert L.
Luo, Meng
Chen, Zhi-Yuan
Bhatnagar, Deepak
author_sort Cary, Jeffrey W.
collection PubMed
description At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contamination is the development of preharvest host resistance. This is because A. flavus infects and produces aflatoxins in susceptible crops prior to harvest. In maize production, the host resistance strategy has gained prominence because of advances in the identification of natural resistance traits. However, native resistance in maize to aflatoxin contamination is polygenic and complex and, therefore, markers need to be identified to facilitate the transfer of resistance traits into agronomically viable genetic backgrounds while limiting the transfer of undesirable traits. Unlike maize, there are no known cotton varieties that demonstrate enhanced resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. For this reason, transgenic approaches are being undertaken in cotton that utilize genes encoding antifungal/anti-aflatoxin factors from maize and other sources to counter fungal infection and toxin production. This review will present information on preharvest control strategies that utilize both breeding and native resistance identification approaches in maize as well as transgenic approaches in cotton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3202838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32028382011-11-08 Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed Cary, Jeffrey W. Rajasekaran, Kanniah Brown, Robert L. Luo, Meng Chen, Zhi-Yuan Bhatnagar, Deepak Toxins (Basel) Review At this time, no “magic bullet” for solving the aflatoxin contamination problem in maize and cottonseed has been identified, so several strategies must be utilized simultaneously to ensure a healthy crop, free of aflatoxins. The most widely explored strategy for the control of aflatoxin contamination is the development of preharvest host resistance. This is because A. flavus infects and produces aflatoxins in susceptible crops prior to harvest. In maize production, the host resistance strategy has gained prominence because of advances in the identification of natural resistance traits. However, native resistance in maize to aflatoxin contamination is polygenic and complex and, therefore, markers need to be identified to facilitate the transfer of resistance traits into agronomically viable genetic backgrounds while limiting the transfer of undesirable traits. Unlike maize, there are no known cotton varieties that demonstrate enhanced resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. For this reason, transgenic approaches are being undertaken in cotton that utilize genes encoding antifungal/anti-aflatoxin factors from maize and other sources to counter fungal infection and toxin production. This review will present information on preharvest control strategies that utilize both breeding and native resistance identification approaches in maize as well as transgenic approaches in cotton. MDPI 2011-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3202838/ /pubmed/22069734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cary, Jeffrey W.
Rajasekaran, Kanniah
Brown, Robert L.
Luo, Meng
Chen, Zhi-Yuan
Bhatnagar, Deepak
Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title_full Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title_fullStr Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title_full_unstemmed Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title_short Developing Resistance to Aflatoxin in Maize and Cottonseed
title_sort developing resistance to aflatoxin in maize and cottonseed
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3202838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins3060678
work_keys_str_mv AT caryjeffreyw developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed
AT rajasekarankanniah developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed
AT brownrobertl developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed
AT luomeng developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed
AT chenzhiyuan developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed
AT bhatnagardeepak developingresistancetoaflatoxininmaizeandcottonseed