Cargando…

Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Women's access to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States has declined steadily since the mid-1990s, with a current rate of 8.2%. In the State of Florida, less than 1% of women with a previous cesarean deliver vaginally. This downturn is thought to be largely relate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cox, Kim J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-72
_version_ 1782215068205711360
author Cox, Kim J
author_facet Cox, Kim J
author_sort Cox, Kim J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women's access to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States has declined steadily since the mid-1990s, with a current rate of 8.2%. In the State of Florida, less than 1% of women with a previous cesarean deliver vaginally. This downturn is thought to be largely related to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) VBAC guidelines, which mandate that a physician and anesthesiologist be "immediately available" during a trial of labor. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore the barriers associated with the ACOG VBAC guidelines, as well as the strategies that obstetricians and midwives use to minimize their legal risks when offering a trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 obstetricians, 12 midwives, and a hospital administrator (n = 24). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis informed the findings. RESULTS: Fear of liability was a central reason for obstetricians and midwives to avoid attending VBACs. Providers who continued to offer a trial of labor attempted to minimize their legal risks by being highly selective in choosing potential candidates. Definitions of "immediately available" varied widely among hospitals, and providers in solo or small practices often favored the convenience of a repeat cesarean delivery rather than having to remain in-house during a trial of labor. Midwives were often marginalized due to restrictive hospital policies and by their consulting physicians, even though women with previous cesareans were actively seeking their care. CONCLUSIONS: The current ACOG VBAC guidelines limit US obstetricians' and midwives' ability to provide care for women with a previous cesarean, particularly in community and rural hospitals. Although ACOG has proposed that women be allowed to accept "higher levels of risk" in order to be able to attempt a trial of labor in some settings, access to VBAC is unlikely to increase in Florida as long as systemic barriers and liability risks remain high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3203084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32030842011-10-28 Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study Cox, Kim J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Women's access to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States has declined steadily since the mid-1990s, with a current rate of 8.2%. In the State of Florida, less than 1% of women with a previous cesarean deliver vaginally. This downturn is thought to be largely related to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) VBAC guidelines, which mandate that a physician and anesthesiologist be "immediately available" during a trial of labor. The aim of this exploratory qualitative study was to explore the barriers associated with the ACOG VBAC guidelines, as well as the strategies that obstetricians and midwives use to minimize their legal risks when offering a trial of labor after cesarean. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 obstetricians, 12 midwives, and a hospital administrator (n = 24). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis informed the findings. RESULTS: Fear of liability was a central reason for obstetricians and midwives to avoid attending VBACs. Providers who continued to offer a trial of labor attempted to minimize their legal risks by being highly selective in choosing potential candidates. Definitions of "immediately available" varied widely among hospitals, and providers in solo or small practices often favored the convenience of a repeat cesarean delivery rather than having to remain in-house during a trial of labor. Midwives were often marginalized due to restrictive hospital policies and by their consulting physicians, even though women with previous cesareans were actively seeking their care. CONCLUSIONS: The current ACOG VBAC guidelines limit US obstetricians' and midwives' ability to provide care for women with a previous cesarean, particularly in community and rural hospitals. Although ACOG has proposed that women be allowed to accept "higher levels of risk" in order to be able to attempt a trial of labor in some settings, access to VBAC is unlikely to increase in Florida as long as systemic barriers and liability risks remain high. BioMed Central 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3203084/ /pubmed/21992871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-72 Text en Copyright ©2011 Cox; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cox, Kim J
Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title_full Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title_short Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study
title_sort providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in florida, united states: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-72
work_keys_str_mv AT coxkimj providersperspectivesonthevaginalbirthaftercesareanguidelinesinfloridaunitedstatesaqualitativestudy