Cargando…
Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event
INTRODUCTION: Terrorist use of a radiological dispersal device (RDD, or “dirty bomb”), which combines a conventional explosive device with radiological materials, is among the National Planning Scenarios of the United States government. Understanding employee willingness to respond is critical for p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025327 |
_version_ | 1782215075540500480 |
---|---|
author | Balicer, Ran D. Catlett, Christina L. Barnett, Daniel J. Thompson, Carol B. Hsu, Edbert B. Morton, Melinda J. Semon, Natalie L. Watson, Christopher M. Gwon, Howard S. Links, Jonathan M. |
author_facet | Balicer, Ran D. Catlett, Christina L. Barnett, Daniel J. Thompson, Carol B. Hsu, Edbert B. Morton, Melinda J. Semon, Natalie L. Watson, Christopher M. Gwon, Howard S. Links, Jonathan M. |
author_sort | Balicer, Ran D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Terrorist use of a radiological dispersal device (RDD, or “dirty bomb”), which combines a conventional explosive device with radiological materials, is among the National Planning Scenarios of the United States government. Understanding employee willingness to respond is critical for planning experts. Previous research has demonstrated that perception of threat and efficacy is key in the assessing willingness to respond to a RDD event. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was used to evaluate the willingness of hospital employees to respond to a RDD event. Agreement with a series of belief statements was assessed, following a methodology validated in previous work. The survey was available online to all 18,612 employees of the Johns Hopkins Hospital from January to March 2009. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 3426 employees (18.4%), whose demographic distribution was similar to overall hospital staff. 39% of hospital workers were not willing to respond to a RDD scenario if asked but not required to do so. Only 11% more were willing if required. Workers who were hesitant to agree to work additional hours when required were 20 times less likely to report during a RDD emergency. Respondents who perceived their peers as likely to report to work in a RDD emergency were 17 times more likely to respond during a RDD event if asked. Only 27.9% of the hospital employees with a perception of low efficacy declared willingness to respond to a severe RDD event. Perception of threat had little impact on willingness to respond among hospital workers. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological scenarios such as RDDs are among the most dreaded emergency events yet studied. Several attitudinal indicators can help to identify hospital employees unlikely to respond. These risk-perception modifiers must then be addressed through training to enable effective hospital response to a RDD event. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3203116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32031162011-11-01 Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event Balicer, Ran D. Catlett, Christina L. Barnett, Daniel J. Thompson, Carol B. Hsu, Edbert B. Morton, Melinda J. Semon, Natalie L. Watson, Christopher M. Gwon, Howard S. Links, Jonathan M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Terrorist use of a radiological dispersal device (RDD, or “dirty bomb”), which combines a conventional explosive device with radiological materials, is among the National Planning Scenarios of the United States government. Understanding employee willingness to respond is critical for planning experts. Previous research has demonstrated that perception of threat and efficacy is key in the assessing willingness to respond to a RDD event. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was used to evaluate the willingness of hospital employees to respond to a RDD event. Agreement with a series of belief statements was assessed, following a methodology validated in previous work. The survey was available online to all 18,612 employees of the Johns Hopkins Hospital from January to March 2009. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 3426 employees (18.4%), whose demographic distribution was similar to overall hospital staff. 39% of hospital workers were not willing to respond to a RDD scenario if asked but not required to do so. Only 11% more were willing if required. Workers who were hesitant to agree to work additional hours when required were 20 times less likely to report during a RDD emergency. Respondents who perceived their peers as likely to report to work in a RDD emergency were 17 times more likely to respond during a RDD event if asked. Only 27.9% of the hospital employees with a perception of low efficacy declared willingness to respond to a severe RDD event. Perception of threat had little impact on willingness to respond among hospital workers. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological scenarios such as RDDs are among the most dreaded emergency events yet studied. Several attitudinal indicators can help to identify hospital employees unlikely to respond. These risk-perception modifiers must then be addressed through training to enable effective hospital response to a RDD event. Public Library of Science 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3203116/ /pubmed/22046238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025327 Text en Balicer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Balicer, Ran D. Catlett, Christina L. Barnett, Daniel J. Thompson, Carol B. Hsu, Edbert B. Morton, Melinda J. Semon, Natalie L. Watson, Christopher M. Gwon, Howard S. Links, Jonathan M. Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title | Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title_full | Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title_fullStr | Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title_short | Characterizing Hospital Workers' Willingness to Respond to a Radiological Event |
title_sort | characterizing hospital workers' willingness to respond to a radiological event |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balicerrand characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT catlettchristinal characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT barnettdanielj characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT thompsoncarolb characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT hsuedbertb characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT mortonmelindaj characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT semonnataliel characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT watsonchristopherm characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT gwonhowards characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent AT linksjonathanm characterizinghospitalworkerswillingnesstorespondtoaradiologicalevent |