Cargando…

Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?

The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bigand, Emmanuel, Delbé, Charles, Gérard, Yannick, Tillmann, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024
_version_ 1782215084080103424
author Bigand, Emmanuel
Delbé, Charles
Gérard, Yannick
Tillmann, Barbara
author_facet Bigand, Emmanuel
Delbé, Charles
Gérard, Yannick
Tillmann, Barbara
author_sort Bigand, Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normalization was applied, music and voices started to be accurately categorized with 20 ms-segments. When the root-mean-square (RMS) energy of the stimuli was equalized, voice stimuli were better recognized than music and environmental sounds. 3) Further psychoacoustical analyses suggest that the categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli depends on the variability of their spectral envelope in the used set. These last two findings challenge the interpretation of the voice superiority effect reported in previously published studies and propose a more parsimonious interpretation in terms of an emerging property of auditory categorization processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3203171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32031712011-11-01 Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? Bigand, Emmanuel Delbé, Charles Gérard, Yannick Tillmann, Barbara PLoS One Research Article The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normalization was applied, music and voices started to be accurately categorized with 20 ms-segments. When the root-mean-square (RMS) energy of the stimuli was equalized, voice stimuli were better recognized than music and environmental sounds. 3) Further psychoacoustical analyses suggest that the categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli depends on the variability of their spectral envelope in the used set. These last two findings challenge the interpretation of the voice superiority effect reported in previously published studies and propose a more parsimonious interpretation in terms of an emerging property of auditory categorization processes. Public Library of Science 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3203171/ /pubmed/22046436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024 Text en Bigand et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bigand, Emmanuel
Delbé, Charles
Gérard, Yannick
Tillmann, Barbara
Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title_full Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title_fullStr Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title_full_unstemmed Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title_short Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
title_sort categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli: domain-specific or domain-general processes?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024
work_keys_str_mv AT bigandemmanuel categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses
AT delbecharles categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses
AT gerardyannick categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses
AT tillmannbarbara categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses