Cargando…
Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes?
The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normali...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024 |
_version_ | 1782215084080103424 |
---|---|
author | Bigand, Emmanuel Delbé, Charles Gérard, Yannick Tillmann, Barbara |
author_facet | Bigand, Emmanuel Delbé, Charles Gérard, Yannick Tillmann, Barbara |
author_sort | Bigand, Emmanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normalization was applied, music and voices started to be accurately categorized with 20 ms-segments. When the root-mean-square (RMS) energy of the stimuli was equalized, voice stimuli were better recognized than music and environmental sounds. 3) Further psychoacoustical analyses suggest that the categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli depends on the variability of their spectral envelope in the used set. These last two findings challenge the interpretation of the voice superiority effect reported in previously published studies and propose a more parsimonious interpretation in terms of an emerging property of auditory categorization processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3203171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32031712011-11-01 Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? Bigand, Emmanuel Delbé, Charles Gérard, Yannick Tillmann, Barbara PLoS One Research Article The present study investigated the minimum amount of auditory stimulation that allows differentiation of spoken voices, instrumental music, and environmental sounds. Three new findings were reported. 1) All stimuli were categorized above chance level with 50 ms-segments. 2) When a peak-level normalization was applied, music and voices started to be accurately categorized with 20 ms-segments. When the root-mean-square (RMS) energy of the stimuli was equalized, voice stimuli were better recognized than music and environmental sounds. 3) Further psychoacoustical analyses suggest that the categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli depends on the variability of their spectral envelope in the used set. These last two findings challenge the interpretation of the voice superiority effect reported in previously published studies and propose a more parsimonious interpretation in terms of an emerging property of auditory categorization processes. Public Library of Science 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3203171/ /pubmed/22046436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024 Text en Bigand et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bigand, Emmanuel Delbé, Charles Gérard, Yannick Tillmann, Barbara Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title | Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title_full | Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title_fullStr | Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title_full_unstemmed | Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title_short | Categorization of Extremely Brief Auditory Stimuli: Domain-Specific or Domain-General Processes? |
title_sort | categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli: domain-specific or domain-general processes? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22046436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bigandemmanuel categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses AT delbecharles categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses AT gerardyannick categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses AT tillmannbarbara categorizationofextremelybriefauditorystimulidomainspecificordomaingeneralprocesses |