Cargando…

Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?

BACKGROUND: Public information on average has limited impact on patients' hospital choice. However, the impact may be greater in consumers who have compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice. We therefore assessed whether patients who have compared hospitals based their hospital choice m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Groot, Ingrid B, Otten, Wilma, Smeets, Harm J, Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-214
_version_ 1782215095260020736
author de Groot, Ingrid B
Otten, Wilma
Smeets, Harm J
Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J
author_facet de Groot, Ingrid B
Otten, Wilma
Smeets, Harm J
Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J
author_sort de Groot, Ingrid B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public information on average has limited impact on patients' hospital choice. However, the impact may be greater in consumers who have compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice. We therefore assessed whether patients who have compared hospitals based their hospital choice mainly on public information, rather than e.g. advice of their general practitioner and consider other information important than patients who have not compared hospitals. METHODS: 337 new surgical patients completed an internet-based questionnaire. They were asked whether they had compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice and which factors influenced their choice. They were also asked to select between four and ten items of hospital information (total: 41 items) relevant for their future hospital choice. These were subsequently used in a hospital choice experiment in which participants were asked to compare hospitals in an Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis to estimate which of the hospital characteristics had the highest Relative Importance (RI). RESULTS: Patients who have compared hospitals more often used public information for their hospital choice than patients who have not compared hospitals (12.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). However, they still mostly relied on their own (47.9%) and other people's experiences (31%) rather than to base their decision on public information. Both groups valued physician's expertise (RI 20.2 [16.6-24.8] in patients comparing hospitals vs. 16.5 [14.2-18.8] in patients not comparing hospitals) and waiting time (RI 15.1 [10.7-19.6] vs. 15.6 [13.2-17.9] respectively) as most important public information. Patients who have compared hospitals assigned greater importance to information on wound infections (p = 0.010) and respect for patients (p = 0.022), but lower importance to hospital distance (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Public information has limited impact on patient's hospital choice, even in patients who have actually compared hospitals prior to hospital choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3203258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32032582011-10-31 Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals? de Groot, Ingrid B Otten, Wilma Smeets, Harm J Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Public information on average has limited impact on patients' hospital choice. However, the impact may be greater in consumers who have compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice. We therefore assessed whether patients who have compared hospitals based their hospital choice mainly on public information, rather than e.g. advice of their general practitioner and consider other information important than patients who have not compared hospitals. METHODS: 337 new surgical patients completed an internet-based questionnaire. They were asked whether they had compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice and which factors influenced their choice. They were also asked to select between four and ten items of hospital information (total: 41 items) relevant for their future hospital choice. These were subsequently used in a hospital choice experiment in which participants were asked to compare hospitals in an Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis to estimate which of the hospital characteristics had the highest Relative Importance (RI). RESULTS: Patients who have compared hospitals more often used public information for their hospital choice than patients who have not compared hospitals (12.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). However, they still mostly relied on their own (47.9%) and other people's experiences (31%) rather than to base their decision on public information. Both groups valued physician's expertise (RI 20.2 [16.6-24.8] in patients comparing hospitals vs. 16.5 [14.2-18.8] in patients not comparing hospitals) and waiting time (RI 15.1 [10.7-19.6] vs. 15.6 [13.2-17.9] respectively) as most important public information. Patients who have compared hospitals assigned greater importance to information on wound infections (p = 0.010) and respect for patients (p = 0.022), but lower importance to hospital distance (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Public information has limited impact on patient's hospital choice, even in patients who have actually compared hospitals prior to hospital choice. BioMed Central 2011-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3203258/ /pubmed/21906293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-214 Text en Copyright ©2011 de Groot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Groot, Ingrid B
Otten, Wilma
Smeets, Harm J
Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J
Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title_full Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title_fullStr Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title_full_unstemmed Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title_short Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
title_sort is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21906293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-214
work_keys_str_mv AT degrootingridb istheimpactofhospitalperformancedatagreaterinpatientswhohavecomparedhospitals
AT ottenwilma istheimpactofhospitalperformancedatagreaterinpatientswhohavecomparedhospitals
AT smeetsharmj istheimpactofhospitalperformancedatagreaterinpatientswhohavecomparedhospitals
AT marangvandemheenperlaj istheimpactofhospitalperformancedatagreaterinpatientswhohavecomparedhospitals