Cargando…

Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children

BACKGROUND: Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Chantal, von Baeyer, Carl L, Falinower, Sylvain, Moyse, Dominique, Annequin, Daniel, Legout, Valérie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-87
_version_ 1782215137860517888
author Wood, Chantal
von Baeyer, Carl L
Falinower, Sylvain
Moyse, Dominique
Annequin, Daniel
Legout, Valérie
author_facet Wood, Chantal
von Baeyer, Carl L
Falinower, Sylvain
Moyse, Dominique
Annequin, Daniel
Legout, Valérie
author_sort Wood, Chantal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain intensity measures. It has been recommended for measuring pain intensity in school-aged children (4 years and older). The objective of this study is to compare the concordance and the preference for two versions, electronic and paper, of the FPS-R, and to determine whether an electronic version of the FPS-R can be used by children aged 4 and older. METHODS: The study is an observational, multicenter, randomized, cross-over, controlled, open trial. Medical and surgical patients in two pediatric hospitals (N = 202, age 4-12 years, mean age 8.3 years, 58% male) provided self-reports of their present pain using the FPS-R on a personal digital assistant (PDA) and on a paper version. Paper and electronic versions of the FPS-R were administered by a nurse in a randomized order: half the patients were given the PDA version first and the other half the paper version first. The time between the administrations was planned to be less than 30 minutes but not simultaneous. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled; 35 were excluded from analysis because of misunderstanding of instructions or abnormal time between the two assessments. RESULTS: Final population for analysis comprised 202 children. The overall weighted Kappa was 0.846 (95%CI: 0.795; 0.896) and the Spearman correlation between scores on the two versions was r(s )= 0.911 (p < 0.0001). The mean difference of pain scores was less than 0.1 out of 10, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant; 83.2% of children chose the same face on both versions of the FPS-R. Preference was not modified by order, sex, age, hospitalization unit (medical or surgical units), or previous analgesics. The PDA was preferred by 87.4% of the children who expressed a preference. CONCLUSION: The electronic version of the FPS-R can be recommended for use with children aged 4 to 12, either in clinical trials or in hospitals to monitor pain intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3203844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32038442011-10-29 Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children Wood, Chantal von Baeyer, Carl L Falinower, Sylvain Moyse, Dominique Annequin, Daniel Legout, Valérie BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of pain in children is an important aspect of pain management and can be performed by observational methods or by self-assessment. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report tool which has strong positive correlations with other well established self-report pain intensity measures. It has been recommended for measuring pain intensity in school-aged children (4 years and older). The objective of this study is to compare the concordance and the preference for two versions, electronic and paper, of the FPS-R, and to determine whether an electronic version of the FPS-R can be used by children aged 4 and older. METHODS: The study is an observational, multicenter, randomized, cross-over, controlled, open trial. Medical and surgical patients in two pediatric hospitals (N = 202, age 4-12 years, mean age 8.3 years, 58% male) provided self-reports of their present pain using the FPS-R on a personal digital assistant (PDA) and on a paper version. Paper and electronic versions of the FPS-R were administered by a nurse in a randomized order: half the patients were given the PDA version first and the other half the paper version first. The time between the administrations was planned to be less than 30 minutes but not simultaneous. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled; 35 were excluded from analysis because of misunderstanding of instructions or abnormal time between the two assessments. RESULTS: Final population for analysis comprised 202 children. The overall weighted Kappa was 0.846 (95%CI: 0.795; 0.896) and the Spearman correlation between scores on the two versions was r(s )= 0.911 (p < 0.0001). The mean difference of pain scores was less than 0.1 out of 10, which was neither statistically nor clinically significant; 83.2% of children chose the same face on both versions of the FPS-R. Preference was not modified by order, sex, age, hospitalization unit (medical or surgical units), or previous analgesics. The PDA was preferred by 87.4% of the children who expressed a preference. CONCLUSION: The electronic version of the FPS-R can be recommended for use with children aged 4 to 12, either in clinical trials or in hospitals to monitor pain intensity. BioMed Central 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3203844/ /pubmed/21989306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-87 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wood et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wood, Chantal
von Baeyer, Carl L
Falinower, Sylvain
Moyse, Dominique
Annequin, Daniel
Legout, Valérie
Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title_full Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title_fullStr Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title_full_unstemmed Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title_short Electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
title_sort electronic and paper versions of a faces pain intensity scale: concordance and preference in hospitalized children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-87
work_keys_str_mv AT woodchantal electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren
AT vonbaeyercarll electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren
AT falinowersylvain electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren
AT moysedominique electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren
AT annequindaniel electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren
AT legoutvalerie electronicandpaperversionsofafacespainintensityscaleconcordanceandpreferenceinhospitalizedchildren