Cargando…

The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities

BACKGROUND: Joint rehabilitation goals are an important component for effective teamwork in the rehabilitation field. The activities and participation domain of the ICF provides a common language for professionals when setting these goals. Involving clients in the formulation of rehabilitation goals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harty, Michal, Griesel, Maryka, van der Merwe, Aletia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21978385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-87
_version_ 1782215184249520128
author Harty, Michal
Griesel, Maryka
van der Merwe, Aletia
author_facet Harty, Michal
Griesel, Maryka
van der Merwe, Aletia
author_sort Harty, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Joint rehabilitation goals are an important component for effective teamwork in the rehabilitation field. The activities and participation domain of the ICF provides a common language for professionals when setting these goals. Involving clients in the formulation of rehabilitation goals is gaining momentum as part of a person-centred approach to rehabilitation. However, this is particularly difficult when clients have an acquired communication disability. The expressive communication difficulties negatively affect the consensus building process. As a result, obtaining information regarding rehabilitation goals from professionals and their clients warrants further investigation for this particular population. METHODS: This comparative study investigated clients and their assigned rehabilitation professionals' perception of the importance of ICF activities and participation domains for inclusion in their rehabilitation program. Twelve clients in an acute rehabilitation centre and twenty of their corresponding rehabilitation professionals participated in an activity using the Talking Mats™ visual framework for goal setting. Each participant rated the importance of the nine activities and participation domains of the ICF for inclusion in their current rehabilitation program. RESULTS: The ICF domains which consistently appear as very important across these groups are mobility, self-care and communication. Domains which consistently appear in the lower third of the rankings include spare time, learning and thinking and domestic life. Results indicate however that no statistical significant differences exist in terms of the individual domains across each of the participant groups. Within group differences however indicated that amongst the speech-language therapists and physiotherapists there was a statistical significant difference between spare time activities and communication and mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that consensus is possible amongst professionals and clients even within an acute-rehabilitation setting. In addition, the Talking Mats™ visual framework appears to be a valid protocol for including clients with acquired communication disabilities in the process of obtaining consensus during goal-setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3204224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32042242011-10-30 The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities Harty, Michal Griesel, Maryka van der Merwe, Aletia Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Joint rehabilitation goals are an important component for effective teamwork in the rehabilitation field. The activities and participation domain of the ICF provides a common language for professionals when setting these goals. Involving clients in the formulation of rehabilitation goals is gaining momentum as part of a person-centred approach to rehabilitation. However, this is particularly difficult when clients have an acquired communication disability. The expressive communication difficulties negatively affect the consensus building process. As a result, obtaining information regarding rehabilitation goals from professionals and their clients warrants further investigation for this particular population. METHODS: This comparative study investigated clients and their assigned rehabilitation professionals' perception of the importance of ICF activities and participation domains for inclusion in their rehabilitation program. Twelve clients in an acute rehabilitation centre and twenty of their corresponding rehabilitation professionals participated in an activity using the Talking Mats™ visual framework for goal setting. Each participant rated the importance of the nine activities and participation domains of the ICF for inclusion in their current rehabilitation program. RESULTS: The ICF domains which consistently appear as very important across these groups are mobility, self-care and communication. Domains which consistently appear in the lower third of the rankings include spare time, learning and thinking and domestic life. Results indicate however that no statistical significant differences exist in terms of the individual domains across each of the participant groups. Within group differences however indicated that amongst the speech-language therapists and physiotherapists there was a statistical significant difference between spare time activities and communication and mobility. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that consensus is possible amongst professionals and clients even within an acute-rehabilitation setting. In addition, the Talking Mats™ visual framework appears to be a valid protocol for including clients with acquired communication disabilities in the process of obtaining consensus during goal-setting. BioMed Central 2011-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3204224/ /pubmed/21978385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-87 Text en Copyright ©2011 Harty et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Harty, Michal
Griesel, Maryka
van der Merwe, Aletia
The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title_full The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title_fullStr The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title_full_unstemmed The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title_short The ICF as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
title_sort icf as a common language for rehabilitation goal-setting: comparing client and professional priorities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21978385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-87
work_keys_str_mv AT hartymichal theicfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities
AT grieselmaryka theicfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities
AT vandermerwealetia theicfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities
AT hartymichal icfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities
AT grieselmaryka icfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities
AT vandermerwealetia icfasacommonlanguageforrehabilitationgoalsettingcomparingclientandprofessionalpriorities