Cargando…
The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration
BACKGROUND: Physician-manned emergency medical teams supplement other emergency medical services in some countries. These teams are often selectively deployed to patients who are considered likely to require critical care treatment in the pre-hospital phase. The evidence base for guidelines for pre-...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21996444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-57 |
_version_ | 1782215187917438976 |
---|---|
author | Fevang, Espen Lockey, David Thompson, Julian Lossius, Hans Morten |
author_facet | Fevang, Espen Lockey, David Thompson, Julian Lossius, Hans Morten |
author_sort | Fevang, Espen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Physician-manned emergency medical teams supplement other emergency medical services in some countries. These teams are often selectively deployed to patients who are considered likely to require critical care treatment in the pre-hospital phase. The evidence base for guidelines for pre-hospital triage and immediate medical care is often poor. We used a recognised consensus methodology to define key priority areas for research within the subfield of physician-provided pre-hospital critical care. METHODS: A European expert panel participated in a consensus process based upon a four-stage modified nominal group technique that included a consensus meeting. RESULTS: The expert panel concluded that the five most important areas for further research in the field of physician-based pre-hospital critical care were the following: Appropriate staffing and training in pre-hospital critical care and the effect on outcomes, advanced airway management in pre-hospital care, definition of time windows for key critical interventions which are indicated in the pre-hospital phase of care, the role of pre-hospital ultrasound and dispatch criteria for pre-hospital critical care services. CONCLUSION: A modified nominal group technique was successfully used by a European expert group to reach consensus on the most important research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3204240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32042402011-10-30 The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration Fevang, Espen Lockey, David Thompson, Julian Lossius, Hans Morten Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Physician-manned emergency medical teams supplement other emergency medical services in some countries. These teams are often selectively deployed to patients who are considered likely to require critical care treatment in the pre-hospital phase. The evidence base for guidelines for pre-hospital triage and immediate medical care is often poor. We used a recognised consensus methodology to define key priority areas for research within the subfield of physician-provided pre-hospital critical care. METHODS: A European expert panel participated in a consensus process based upon a four-stage modified nominal group technique that included a consensus meeting. RESULTS: The expert panel concluded that the five most important areas for further research in the field of physician-based pre-hospital critical care were the following: Appropriate staffing and training in pre-hospital critical care and the effect on outcomes, advanced airway management in pre-hospital care, definition of time windows for key critical interventions which are indicated in the pre-hospital phase of care, the role of pre-hospital ultrasound and dispatch criteria for pre-hospital critical care services. CONCLUSION: A modified nominal group technique was successfully used by a European expert group to reach consensus on the most important research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care. BioMed Central 2011-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3204240/ /pubmed/21996444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-57 Text en Copyright ©2011 Fevang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fevang, Espen Lockey, David Thompson, Julian Lossius, Hans Morten The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title | The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title_full | The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title_fullStr | The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title_full_unstemmed | The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title_short | The top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a European research collaboration |
title_sort | top five research priorities in physician-provided pre-hospital critical care: a consensus report from a european research collaboration |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21996444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fevangespen thetopfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT lockeydavid thetopfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT thompsonjulian thetopfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT lossiushansmorten thetopfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT fevangespen topfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT lockeydavid topfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT thompsonjulian topfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration AT lossiushansmorten topfiveresearchprioritiesinphysicianprovidedprehospitalcriticalcareaconsensusreportfromaeuropeanresearchcollaboration |