Cargando…
Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific incr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281 |
_version_ | 1782215235604578304 |
---|---|
author | van Steenbergen, Henk Band, Guido P. H. Hommel, Bernhard |
author_facet | van Steenbergen, Henk Band, Guido P. H. Hommel, Bernhard |
author_sort | van Steenbergen, Henk |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific increases in physiological arousal, as measured by pupil dilation, could account for attentional narrowing effects in a cognitive control task. Following the presentation of a negative, positive, or neutral picture, participants performed a saccade task with a pro-saccade versus an anti-saccade instruction. The reaction time difference between pro- and anti-saccades was used to index attentional selectivity, and while pupil diameter was used as an index of physiological arousal. Pupil dilation was observed for both negative and positive pictures, which indicates increased physiological arousal. However, increased attentional selectivity was only observed following negative pictures. Our data show that motivational intensity effects on attentional narrowing can occur independently of physiological arousal effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3204575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32045752011-11-04 Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control van Steenbergen, Henk Band, Guido P. H. Hommel, Bernhard Front Psychol Psychology It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific increases in physiological arousal, as measured by pupil dilation, could account for attentional narrowing effects in a cognitive control task. Following the presentation of a negative, positive, or neutral picture, participants performed a saccade task with a pro-saccade versus an anti-saccade instruction. The reaction time difference between pro- and anti-saccades was used to index attentional selectivity, and while pupil diameter was used as an index of physiological arousal. Pupil dilation was observed for both negative and positive pictures, which indicates increased physiological arousal. However, increased attentional selectivity was only observed following negative pictures. Our data show that motivational intensity effects on attentional narrowing can occur independently of physiological arousal effects. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3204575/ /pubmed/22059081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281 Text en Copyright © 2011 van Steenbergen, Band and Hommel. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with. |
spellingShingle | Psychology van Steenbergen, Henk Band, Guido P. H. Hommel, Bernhard Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title | Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title_full | Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title_fullStr | Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title_full_unstemmed | Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title_short | Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control |
title_sort | threat but not arousal narrows attention: evidence from pupil dilation and saccade control |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vansteenbergenhenk threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol AT bandguidoph threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol AT hommelbernhard threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol |