Cargando…

Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control

It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific incr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Steenbergen, Henk, Band, Guido P. H., Hommel, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281
_version_ 1782215235604578304
author van Steenbergen, Henk
Band, Guido P. H.
Hommel, Bernhard
author_facet van Steenbergen, Henk
Band, Guido P. H.
Hommel, Bernhard
author_sort van Steenbergen, Henk
collection PubMed
description It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific increases in physiological arousal, as measured by pupil dilation, could account for attentional narrowing effects in a cognitive control task. Following the presentation of a negative, positive, or neutral picture, participants performed a saccade task with a pro-saccade versus an anti-saccade instruction. The reaction time difference between pro- and anti-saccades was used to index attentional selectivity, and while pupil diameter was used as an index of physiological arousal. Pupil dilation was observed for both negative and positive pictures, which indicates increased physiological arousal. However, increased attentional selectivity was only observed following negative pictures. Our data show that motivational intensity effects on attentional narrowing can occur independently of physiological arousal effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3204575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32045752011-11-04 Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control van Steenbergen, Henk Band, Guido P. H. Hommel, Bernhard Front Psychol Psychology It has been shown that negative affect causes attentional narrowing. According to Easterbrook’s (1959) influential hypothesis this effect is driven by the withdrawal motivation inherent to negative emotions and might be related to increases in arousal. We investigated whether valence-unspecific increases in physiological arousal, as measured by pupil dilation, could account for attentional narrowing effects in a cognitive control task. Following the presentation of a negative, positive, or neutral picture, participants performed a saccade task with a pro-saccade versus an anti-saccade instruction. The reaction time difference between pro- and anti-saccades was used to index attentional selectivity, and while pupil diameter was used as an index of physiological arousal. Pupil dilation was observed for both negative and positive pictures, which indicates increased physiological arousal. However, increased attentional selectivity was only observed following negative pictures. Our data show that motivational intensity effects on attentional narrowing can occur independently of physiological arousal effects. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3204575/ /pubmed/22059081 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281 Text en Copyright © 2011 van Steenbergen, Band and Hommel. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
van Steenbergen, Henk
Band, Guido P. H.
Hommel, Bernhard
Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title_full Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title_fullStr Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title_full_unstemmed Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title_short Threat But Not Arousal Narrows Attention: Evidence from Pupil Dilation and Saccade Control
title_sort threat but not arousal narrows attention: evidence from pupil dilation and saccade control
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059081
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00281
work_keys_str_mv AT vansteenbergenhenk threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol
AT bandguidoph threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol
AT hommelbernhard threatbutnotarousalnarrowsattentionevidencefrompupildilationandsaccadecontrol