Cargando…

Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006

Despite widespread use of communicable disease surveillance data to inform public health intervention and control measures, the reporting completeness of the notifiable disease surveillance system remains incompletely assessed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive study of reporting completeness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E., Weber, David J., Poole, Charles, MacDonald, Pia D.M., Maillard, Jean-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21192850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.100660
_version_ 1782215239587069952
author Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
Weber, David J.
Poole, Charles
MacDonald, Pia D.M.
Maillard, Jean-Marie
author_facet Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
Weber, David J.
Poole, Charles
MacDonald, Pia D.M.
Maillard, Jean-Marie
author_sort Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
collection PubMed
description Despite widespread use of communicable disease surveillance data to inform public health intervention and control measures, the reporting completeness of the notifiable disease surveillance system remains incompletely assessed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive study of reporting completeness with an analysis of 53 diseases reported by 8 health care systems across North Carolina, USA, during 1995–1997 and 2000–2006. All patients who were assigned an International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnosis code for a state-required reportable communicable disease were matched to surveillance records. We used logistic regression techniques to estimate reporting completeness by disease, year, and health care system. The completeness of reporting varied among the health care systems from 2% to 30% and improved over time. Disease-specific reporting completeness proportions ranged from 0% to 82%, but were generally low even for diseases with great public health importance and opportunity for interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3204630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32046302011-11-03 Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006 Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E. Weber, David J. Poole, Charles MacDonald, Pia D.M. Maillard, Jean-Marie Emerg Infect Dis Research Despite widespread use of communicable disease surveillance data to inform public health intervention and control measures, the reporting completeness of the notifiable disease surveillance system remains incompletely assessed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive study of reporting completeness with an analysis of 53 diseases reported by 8 health care systems across North Carolina, USA, during 1995–1997 and 2000–2006. All patients who were assigned an International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, diagnosis code for a state-required reportable communicable disease were matched to surveillance records. We used logistic regression techniques to estimate reporting completeness by disease, year, and health care system. The completeness of reporting varied among the health care systems from 2% to 30% and improved over time. Disease-specific reporting completeness proportions ranged from 0% to 82%, but were generally low even for diseases with great public health importance and opportunity for interventions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3204630/ /pubmed/21192850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.100660 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E.
Weber, David J.
Poole, Charles
MacDonald, Pia D.M.
Maillard, Jean-Marie
Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title_full Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title_fullStr Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title_full_unstemmed Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title_short Completeness of Communicable Disease Reporting, North Carolina, USA, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
title_sort completeness of communicable disease reporting, north carolina, usa, 1995–1997 and 2000–2006
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21192850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.100660
work_keys_str_mv AT sickbertbennettemilye completenessofcommunicablediseasereportingnorthcarolinausa19951997and20002006
AT weberdavidj completenessofcommunicablediseasereportingnorthcarolinausa19951997and20002006
AT poolecharles completenessofcommunicablediseasereportingnorthcarolinausa19951997and20002006
AT macdonaldpiadm completenessofcommunicablediseasereportingnorthcarolinausa19951997and20002006
AT maillardjeanmarie completenessofcommunicablediseasereportingnorthcarolinausa19951997and20002006