Cargando…

Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia

PURPOSE: Hernia repair after recurrence is a challenging procedure, and many approaches have been suggested for it. Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair should be considered in recurrent hernia. This study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the clinical usefulness of laparoscopic TE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, In Sik, Lee, Sang Mok, Kim, Joo Hyun, Kim, Beum Su, Choi, Sung Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22066054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.80.5.313
_version_ 1782215251281838080
author Jang, In Sik
Lee, Sang Mok
Kim, Joo Hyun
Kim, Beum Su
Choi, Sung Il
author_facet Jang, In Sik
Lee, Sang Mok
Kim, Joo Hyun
Kim, Beum Su
Choi, Sung Il
author_sort Jang, In Sik
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Hernia repair after recurrence is a challenging procedure, and many approaches have been suggested for it. Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair should be considered in recurrent hernia. This study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the clinical usefulness of laparoscopic TEP hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia. METHODS: Among the 191 patients who underwent TEP hernia repair at these authors' center from June 2006 to January 2010, the bilateral-hernia cases and the patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery were excluded. A total of 19 patients (12.5%) were enrolled in the recurrent-inguinal-hernia group (group R), and 133 patients (87.5%) in the primary-hernia group (group P). Data were investigated retrospectively, based on the medical records. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 97 minutes in group R and 99 minutes in group P (>0.05). In group R, no operation modality change occurred, and temporary urinary retention was developed in four patients (21.1%). In group P, on the other hand, operation modality change from TEP to the transabdominal preperitoneal approach was necessary in four patients (3%). Additionally, in group P, 30 patients (22.6%) had temporary urinary retention and six (4.5%) had testicular edema. No recurrence was identified during the follow-up period in both groups (mean follow-up period: 15.8 months for group R and 18.0 months for group P). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TEP hernia repair seems to be a safe and useful method for correcting recurrent inguinal hernia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3204698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32046982011-11-07 Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia Jang, In Sik Lee, Sang Mok Kim, Joo Hyun Kim, Beum Su Choi, Sung Il J Korean Surg Soc Original Article PURPOSE: Hernia repair after recurrence is a challenging procedure, and many approaches have been suggested for it. Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair should be considered in recurrent hernia. This study was conducted for the purpose of investigating the clinical usefulness of laparoscopic TEP hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia. METHODS: Among the 191 patients who underwent TEP hernia repair at these authors' center from June 2006 to January 2010, the bilateral-hernia cases and the patients with a history of previous pelvic surgery were excluded. A total of 19 patients (12.5%) were enrolled in the recurrent-inguinal-hernia group (group R), and 133 patients (87.5%) in the primary-hernia group (group P). Data were investigated retrospectively, based on the medical records. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 97 minutes in group R and 99 minutes in group P (>0.05). In group R, no operation modality change occurred, and temporary urinary retention was developed in four patients (21.1%). In group P, on the other hand, operation modality change from TEP to the transabdominal preperitoneal approach was necessary in four patients (3%). Additionally, in group P, 30 patients (22.6%) had temporary urinary retention and six (4.5%) had testicular edema. No recurrence was identified during the follow-up period in both groups (mean follow-up period: 15.8 months for group R and 18.0 months for group P). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TEP hernia repair seems to be a safe and useful method for correcting recurrent inguinal hernia. The Korean Surgical Society 2011-05 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3204698/ /pubmed/22066054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.80.5.313 Text en Copyright © 2011, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 Journal of the Korean Surgical Society is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jang, In Sik
Lee, Sang Mok
Kim, Joo Hyun
Kim, Beum Su
Choi, Sung Il
Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title_full Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title_fullStr Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title_full_unstemmed Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title_short Clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
title_sort clinical usefulness of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair for recurrent inguinal hernia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3204698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22066054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.80.5.313
work_keys_str_mv AT janginsik clinicalusefulnessoflaparoscopictotalextraperitonealherniarepairforrecurrentinguinalhernia
AT leesangmok clinicalusefulnessoflaparoscopictotalextraperitonealherniarepairforrecurrentinguinalhernia
AT kimjoohyun clinicalusefulnessoflaparoscopictotalextraperitonealherniarepairforrecurrentinguinalhernia
AT kimbeumsu clinicalusefulnessoflaparoscopictotalextraperitonealherniarepairforrecurrentinguinalhernia
AT choisungil clinicalusefulnessoflaparoscopictotalextraperitonealherniarepairforrecurrentinguinalhernia