Cargando…

Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S

BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify the statistical software applications most commonly employed for data analysis in health services research (HSR) studies in the U.S. The study also examines the extent to which information describing the specific analytical software utilized is provided in pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dembe, Allard E, Partridge, Jamie S, Geist, Laurel C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21977990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-252
_version_ 1782215281689493504
author Dembe, Allard E
Partridge, Jamie S
Geist, Laurel C
author_facet Dembe, Allard E
Partridge, Jamie S
Geist, Laurel C
author_sort Dembe, Allard E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify the statistical software applications most commonly employed for data analysis in health services research (HSR) studies in the U.S. The study also examines the extent to which information describing the specific analytical software utilized is provided in published articles reporting on HSR studies. METHODS: Data were extracted from a sample of 1,139 articles (including 877 original research articles) published between 2007 and 2009 in three U.S. HSR journals, that were considered to be representative of the field based upon a set of selection criteria. Descriptive analyses were conducted to categorize patterns in statistical software usage in those articles. The data were stratified by calendar year to detect trends in software use over time. RESULTS: Only 61.0% of original research articles in prominent U.S. HSR journals identified the particular type of statistical software application used for data analysis. Stata and SAS were overwhelmingly the most commonly used software applications employed (in 46.0% and 42.6% of articles respectively). However, SAS use grew considerably during the study period compared to other applications. Stratification of the data revealed that the type of statistical software used varied considerably by whether authors were from the U.S. or from other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight a need for HSR investigators to identify more consistently the specific analytical software used in their studies. Knowing that information can be important, because different software packages might produce varying results, owing to differences in the software's underlying estimation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32050332011-11-01 Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S Dembe, Allard E Partridge, Jamie S Geist, Laurel C BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aims to identify the statistical software applications most commonly employed for data analysis in health services research (HSR) studies in the U.S. The study also examines the extent to which information describing the specific analytical software utilized is provided in published articles reporting on HSR studies. METHODS: Data were extracted from a sample of 1,139 articles (including 877 original research articles) published between 2007 and 2009 in three U.S. HSR journals, that were considered to be representative of the field based upon a set of selection criteria. Descriptive analyses were conducted to categorize patterns in statistical software usage in those articles. The data were stratified by calendar year to detect trends in software use over time. RESULTS: Only 61.0% of original research articles in prominent U.S. HSR journals identified the particular type of statistical software application used for data analysis. Stata and SAS were overwhelmingly the most commonly used software applications employed (in 46.0% and 42.6% of articles respectively). However, SAS use grew considerably during the study period compared to other applications. Stratification of the data revealed that the type of statistical software used varied considerably by whether authors were from the U.S. or from other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight a need for HSR investigators to identify more consistently the specific analytical software used in their studies. Knowing that information can be important, because different software packages might produce varying results, owing to differences in the software's underlying estimation methods. BioMed Central 2011-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3205033/ /pubmed/21977990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-252 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dembe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dembe, Allard E
Partridge, Jamie S
Geist, Laurel C
Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title_full Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title_fullStr Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title_full_unstemmed Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title_short Statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the U.S
title_sort statistical software applications used in health services research: analysis of published studies in the u.s
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21977990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-252
work_keys_str_mv AT dembeallarde statisticalsoftwareapplicationsusedinhealthservicesresearchanalysisofpublishedstudiesintheus
AT partridgejamies statisticalsoftwareapplicationsusedinhealthservicesresearchanalysisofpublishedstudiesintheus
AT geistlaurelc statisticalsoftwareapplicationsusedinhealthservicesresearchanalysisofpublishedstudiesintheus