Cargando…

Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex

We report performance measures for lexical decision (LD), word naming (NMG), and progressive demasking (PDM) for a large sample of monosyllabic monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrand, Ludovic, Brysbaert, Marc, Keuleers, Emmanuel, New, Boris, Bonin, Patrick, Méot, Alain, Augustinova, Maria, Pallier, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22053160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
_version_ 1782215310004191232
author Ferrand, Ludovic
Brysbaert, Marc
Keuleers, Emmanuel
New, Boris
Bonin, Patrick
Méot, Alain
Augustinova, Maria
Pallier, Christophe
author_facet Ferrand, Ludovic
Brysbaert, Marc
Keuleers, Emmanuel
New, Boris
Bonin, Patrick
Méot, Alain
Augustinova, Maria
Pallier, Christophe
author_sort Ferrand, Ludovic
collection PubMed
description We report performance measures for lexical decision (LD), word naming (NMG), and progressive demasking (PDM) for a large sample of monosyllabic monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in LD. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. PDM was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than LD, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32054382011-11-03 Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex Ferrand, Ludovic Brysbaert, Marc Keuleers, Emmanuel New, Boris Bonin, Patrick Méot, Alain Augustinova, Maria Pallier, Christophe Front Psychol Psychology We report performance measures for lexical decision (LD), word naming (NMG), and progressive demasking (PDM) for a large sample of monosyllabic monomorphemic French words (N = 1,482). We compare the tasks and also examine the impact of word length, word frequency, initial phoneme, orthographic and phonological distance to neighbors, age-of-acquisition, and subjective frequency. Our results show that objective word frequency is by far the most important variable to predict reaction times in LD. For word naming, it is the first phoneme. PDM was more influenced by a semantic variable (word imageability) than LD, but was also affected to a much greater extent by perceptual variables (word length, first phoneme/letters). This may reduce its usefulness as a psycholinguistic word recognition task. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3205438/ /pubmed/22053160 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ferrand, Brysbaert, Keuleers, New, Bonin, Méot, Augustinova and Pallier. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ferrand, Ludovic
Brysbaert, Marc
Keuleers, Emmanuel
New, Boris
Bonin, Patrick
Méot, Alain
Augustinova, Maria
Pallier, Christophe
Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title_full Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title_fullStr Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title_short Comparing Word Processing Times in Naming, Lexical Decision, and Progressive Demasking: Evidence from Chronolex
title_sort comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: evidence from chronolex
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22053160
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrandludovic comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT brysbaertmarc comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT keuleersemmanuel comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT newboris comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT boninpatrick comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT meotalain comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT augustinovamaria comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex
AT pallierchristophe comparingwordprocessingtimesinnaminglexicaldecisionandprogressivedemaskingevidencefromchronolex