Cargando…

Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency

BACKGROUND: Meningioma firmness is a critical factor that influences ease of resection and risk, notably when operating on tumors intimate with neurovascular structures such as the mesial sphenoid wing. This study develops a predictive tool using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) charact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoover, Jason M., Morris, Jonathan M., Meyer, Fredric B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.85983
_version_ 1782215319669964800
author Hoover, Jason M.
Morris, Jonathan M.
Meyer, Fredric B.
author_facet Hoover, Jason M.
Morris, Jonathan M.
Meyer, Fredric B.
author_sort Hoover, Jason M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Meningioma firmness is a critical factor that influences ease of resection and risk, notably when operating on tumors intimate with neurovascular structures such as the mesial sphenoid wing. This study develops a predictive tool using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics to determine meningioma consistency. METHODS: 101 patients with intracranial meningioma (50 soft/51 firm) were included. MRI characteristics of 38 tumors (19 soft/19 firm) were retrospectively reviewed to identify preoperative imaging features that were then correlated with intraoperative description of the tumor as either “soft and/or suckable” or “firm and/or fibrous”. Criteria were developed to predict consistency and then blindly applied to the remaining 63 meningiomas (31 soft/32 firm). RESULTS: The overall sensitivities for detecting soft and firm consistency were 90% and 56%, respectively (95% CI = 73–97% and 38–73%; P < 0.001). Compared to gray matter, meningiomas that were T2 hypointense were almost always firm. Soft meningiomas were hyperintense on T2 and hypointense on T1. Soft meningiomas were slightly larger and less likely to be associated with edema. There was a slight preponderance of firm meningiomas in the infratentorial compartment. Grade of meningioma was not predictive. Contrast enhancement, diffusion restriction, changes in overlying bone, intratumoral cysts, and angiographic features were not predictable. CONCLUSIONS: This tool using T1 and T2 series predicts meningioma consistency. Such knowledge should assist the surgeon in preoperative planning and counseling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32055112011-11-06 Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency Hoover, Jason M. Morris, Jonathan M. Meyer, Fredric B. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Meningioma firmness is a critical factor that influences ease of resection and risk, notably when operating on tumors intimate with neurovascular structures such as the mesial sphenoid wing. This study develops a predictive tool using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics to determine meningioma consistency. METHODS: 101 patients with intracranial meningioma (50 soft/51 firm) were included. MRI characteristics of 38 tumors (19 soft/19 firm) were retrospectively reviewed to identify preoperative imaging features that were then correlated with intraoperative description of the tumor as either “soft and/or suckable” or “firm and/or fibrous”. Criteria were developed to predict consistency and then blindly applied to the remaining 63 meningiomas (31 soft/32 firm). RESULTS: The overall sensitivities for detecting soft and firm consistency were 90% and 56%, respectively (95% CI = 73–97% and 38–73%; P < 0.001). Compared to gray matter, meningiomas that were T2 hypointense were almost always firm. Soft meningiomas were hyperintense on T2 and hypointense on T1. Soft meningiomas were slightly larger and less likely to be associated with edema. There was a slight preponderance of firm meningiomas in the infratentorial compartment. Grade of meningioma was not predictive. Contrast enhancement, diffusion restriction, changes in overlying bone, intratumoral cysts, and angiographic features were not predictable. CONCLUSIONS: This tool using T1 and T2 series predicts meningioma consistency. Such knowledge should assist the surgeon in preoperative planning and counseling. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3205511/ /pubmed/22059137 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.85983 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Hoover JM. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hoover, Jason M.
Morris, Jonathan M.
Meyer, Fredric B.
Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title_full Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title_fullStr Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title_full_unstemmed Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title_short Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
title_sort use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging t1 and t2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059137
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.85983
work_keys_str_mv AT hooverjasonm useofpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingt1andt2sequencestodetermineintraoperativemeningiomaconsistency
AT morrisjonathanm useofpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingt1andt2sequencestodetermineintraoperativemeningiomaconsistency
AT meyerfredricb useofpreoperativemagneticresonanceimagingt1andt2sequencestodetermineintraoperativemeningiomaconsistency