Cargando…

Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints

The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scribante, Andrea, Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, Broggini, Simona, D'Allocco, Marina, Gandini, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22114597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356
_version_ 1782215339348590592
author Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Broggini, Simona
D'Allocco, Marina
Gandini, Paola
author_facet Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Broggini, Simona
D'Allocco, Marina
Gandini, Paola
author_sort Scribante, Andrea
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32056612011-11-23 Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints Scribante, Andrea Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Broggini, Simona D'Allocco, Marina Gandini, Paola Int J Dent Clinical Study The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3205661/ /pubmed/22114597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356 Text en Copyright © 2011 Andrea Scribante et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Broggini, Simona
D'Allocco, Marina
Gandini, Paola
Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_full Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_fullStr Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_short Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
title_sort efficacy of esthetic retainers: clinical comparison between multistranded wires and direct-bond glass fiber-reinforced composite splints
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22114597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/548356
work_keys_str_mv AT scribanteandrea efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT sfondrinimariafrancesca efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT brogginisimona efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT dalloccomarina efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints
AT gandinipaola efficacyofestheticretainersclinicalcomparisonbetweenmultistrandedwiresanddirectbondglassfiberreinforcedcompositesplints