Cargando…
Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration
Measurements of Cyclosporine (CsA) systemic exposure permit its dose adjustment in allogenic stem cell transplantation recipients to prevent graft-versus-host disease. CsA LSSs were developed and validated from 60 ASCT patients via multiple linear regressions. All whole-blood samples were analyzed b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/342701 |
_version_ | 1782215339795283968 |
---|---|
author | ELjebari, Hanene Ben Fradj, Nadia Salouage, Issam Gaies, Emna Trabelsi, Sameh Jebabli, Nadia Lakhal, Mohamed Ben Othman, Tarek Kouz, Anis |
author_facet | ELjebari, Hanene Ben Fradj, Nadia Salouage, Issam Gaies, Emna Trabelsi, Sameh Jebabli, Nadia Lakhal, Mohamed Ben Othman, Tarek Kouz, Anis |
author_sort | ELjebari, Hanene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measurements of Cyclosporine (CsA) systemic exposure permit its dose adjustment in allogenic stem cell transplantation recipients to prevent graft-versus-host disease. CsA LSSs were developed and validated from 60 ASCT patients via multiple linear regressions. All whole-blood samples were analyzed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA-Axym). The 10 models that have used CsA concentrations at a single time point did not have a good fit with AUC(0–12) (R(2) < 0.90). C (2) and C (4) were the time points that correlated best with AUC(0–12 h), R(2) were respectively 0.848, and 0.897. The LSS equation with the best predictive performance (bias, precision and number of samples) utilized three sampling concentrations was AUC(0–12 h) = 0.607 + 1.569 × C (0.5) + 2.098 × C (2) + 3.603 × C (4) (R(2) = 0.943). Optimal LSSs equations which limited to those utilizing three timed concentrations taken within 4 hours post-dose developed from ASCT recipient's patients yielded a low bias <5% ranged from 1.27% to 2.68% and good precision <15% ranged from 9.60% and 11.02%. We propose an LSS model with equation AUC(0–12 h) = 0.82 + 2.766 × C (2) + 3.409 × C (4) for a practical reason. Bias and precision for this model are respectively 2.68% and 11.02%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3205663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32056632011-11-30 Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration ELjebari, Hanene Ben Fradj, Nadia Salouage, Issam Gaies, Emna Trabelsi, Sameh Jebabli, Nadia Lakhal, Mohamed Ben Othman, Tarek Kouz, Anis J Transplant Clinical Study Measurements of Cyclosporine (CsA) systemic exposure permit its dose adjustment in allogenic stem cell transplantation recipients to prevent graft-versus-host disease. CsA LSSs were developed and validated from 60 ASCT patients via multiple linear regressions. All whole-blood samples were analyzed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA-Axym). The 10 models that have used CsA concentrations at a single time point did not have a good fit with AUC(0–12) (R(2) < 0.90). C (2) and C (4) were the time points that correlated best with AUC(0–12 h), R(2) were respectively 0.848, and 0.897. The LSS equation with the best predictive performance (bias, precision and number of samples) utilized three sampling concentrations was AUC(0–12 h) = 0.607 + 1.569 × C (0.5) + 2.098 × C (2) + 3.603 × C (4) (R(2) = 0.943). Optimal LSSs equations which limited to those utilizing three timed concentrations taken within 4 hours post-dose developed from ASCT recipient's patients yielded a low bias <5% ranged from 1.27% to 2.68% and good precision <15% ranged from 9.60% and 11.02%. We propose an LSS model with equation AUC(0–12 h) = 0.82 + 2.766 × C (2) + 3.409 × C (4) for a practical reason. Bias and precision for this model are respectively 2.68% and 11.02%. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3205663/ /pubmed/22132303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/342701 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hanene ELjebari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study ELjebari, Hanene Ben Fradj, Nadia Salouage, Issam Gaies, Emna Trabelsi, Sameh Jebabli, Nadia Lakhal, Mohamed Ben Othman, Tarek Kouz, Anis Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title | Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title_full | Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title_fullStr | Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title_short | Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration |
title_sort | estimation of abbreviated cyclosporine a area under the concentration-time curve in allogenic stem cell transplantation after oral administration |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22132303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/342701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eljebarihanene estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT benfradjnadia estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT salouageissam estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT gaiesemna estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT trabelsisameh estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT jebablinadia estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT lakhalmohamed estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT benothmantarek estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration AT kouzanis estimationofabbreviatedcyclosporineaareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveinallogenicstemcelltransplantationafteroraladministration |