Cargando…

Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients

The purpose of our study was to determine the clinical usefulness of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses. A retrospective study of 28 patients who underwent image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses from 2005 to 2007 was performed. In 19 (68%) patients, the mass was detected as part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Souza, Frederico Ferreira, De Angelo Andrade, Maurício, Smith, Andrew, Dei Santi, Daniel B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-Med 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0006
_version_ 1782215356803186688
author Souza, Frederico Ferreira
De Angelo Andrade, Maurício
Smith, Andrew
Dei Santi, Daniel B.
author_facet Souza, Frederico Ferreira
De Angelo Andrade, Maurício
Smith, Andrew
Dei Santi, Daniel B.
author_sort Souza, Frederico Ferreira
collection PubMed
description The purpose of our study was to determine the clinical usefulness of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses. A retrospective study of 28 patients who underwent image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses from 2005 to 2007 was performed. In 19 (68%) patients, the mass was detected as part of a staging evaluation in patients with known malignancy; 9 (32%) patients had no known malignancy. Biopsy results were classified as diagnostic (malignant or benign) or non-diagnostic (atypical and insufficient). Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were calculated for all patients, and the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test was used to determine if test characteristics varied in patients with and without a history of cancer, masses smaller and greater than 5 cm, or according to needle size. The overall diagnostic rate was 71%. Of these, there were 20 true-positives, 3 true-negatives, 5 false-negatives and no false-positive results (sensitivity 80% (20/25), specificity 100% (3/3) and negative predictive value 37.5% (3/8)). There were no differences between patients with and without cancer. Among 19 patients with known cancer, 10 had metastatic disease from their known primary. Biopsy test characteristics did not differ with respect to mass or needle size. Minor complications were seen in 7% of patients. Image-guided chest wall mass biopsy is a sensitive and specific procedure, which is clinically important in the care of patients both with and without a known primary cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3205750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher e-Med
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32057502013-04-25 Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients Souza, Frederico Ferreira De Angelo Andrade, Maurício Smith, Andrew Dei Santi, Daniel B. Cancer Imaging Original Article The purpose of our study was to determine the clinical usefulness of percutaneous image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses. A retrospective study of 28 patients who underwent image-guided biopsy of chest wall masses from 2005 to 2007 was performed. In 19 (68%) patients, the mass was detected as part of a staging evaluation in patients with known malignancy; 9 (32%) patients had no known malignancy. Biopsy results were classified as diagnostic (malignant or benign) or non-diagnostic (atypical and insufficient). Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value were calculated for all patients, and the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test was used to determine if test characteristics varied in patients with and without a history of cancer, masses smaller and greater than 5 cm, or according to needle size. The overall diagnostic rate was 71%. Of these, there were 20 true-positives, 3 true-negatives, 5 false-negatives and no false-positive results (sensitivity 80% (20/25), specificity 100% (3/3) and negative predictive value 37.5% (3/8)). There were no differences between patients with and without cancer. Among 19 patients with known cancer, 10 had metastatic disease from their known primary. Biopsy test characteristics did not differ with respect to mass or needle size. Minor complications were seen in 7% of patients. Image-guided chest wall mass biopsy is a sensitive and specific procedure, which is clinically important in the care of patients both with and without a known primary cancer. e-Med 2011-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3205750/ /pubmed/21555261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0006 Text en © 2011 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Original Article
Souza, Frederico Ferreira
De Angelo Andrade, Maurício
Smith, Andrew
Dei Santi, Daniel B.
Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title_full Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title_fullStr Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title_short Clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
title_sort clinical utility of image-guided chest wall mass biopsy: results in 28 patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21555261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0006
work_keys_str_mv AT souzafredericoferreira clinicalutilityofimageguidedchestwallmassbiopsyresultsin28patients
AT deangeloandrademauricio clinicalutilityofimageguidedchestwallmassbiopsyresultsin28patients
AT smithandrew clinicalutilityofimageguidedchestwallmassbiopsyresultsin28patients
AT deisantidanielb clinicalutilityofimageguidedchestwallmassbiopsyresultsin28patients